18 results (0.013 seconds)

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 97%CPEs: 97EXPL: 25

A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it. Una aplicación Spring MVC o Spring WebFlux que es ejecutada en JDK 9+ puede ser vulnerable a la ejecución de código remota (RCE) por medio de una vinculación de datos. • https://github.com/0zvxr/CVE-2022-22965 https://github.com/alt3kx/CVE-2022-22965 https://github.com/zangcc/CVE-2022-22965-rexbb https://github.com/Kirill89/CVE-2022-22965-PoC https://github.com/tangxiaofeng7/CVE-2022-22965-Spring-Core-Rce https://github.com/p1ckzi/CVE-2022-22965 https://github.com/me2nuk/CVE-2022-22965 https://github.com/light-Life/CVE-2022-22965-GUItools https://github.com/viniciuspereiras/CVE-2022-22965-poc https://github.com/itsecurityco/CVE-2022-2 • CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 97%CPEs: 47EXPL: 23

In Spring Cloud Function versions 3.1.6, 3.2.2 and older unsupported versions, when using routing functionality it is possible for a user to provide a specially crafted SpEL as a routing-expression that may result in remote code execution and access to local resources. En Spring Cloud Function versiones 3.1.6, 3.2.2 y versiones anteriores no soportadas, cuando es usada la funcionalidad routing es posible que un usuario proporcione un SpEL especialmente diseñado como expresión de enrutamiento que puede resultar en la ejecución de código remota y el acceso a recursos locales A flaw was found in Spring Cloud Function via the spring.cloud.function.routing-expression header that is modified by the attacker to contain malicious expression language code. The attacker is able to call functions that should not normally be accessible, including runtime exec calls. Spring Cloud Function versions prior to 3.1.7 and 3.2.3 are vulnerable to remote code execution due to using an unsafe evaluation context with user-provided queries. By crafting a request to the application and setting the spring.cloud.function.routing-expression header, an unauthenticated attacker can gain remote code execution. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/51577 https://github.com/dinosn/CVE-2022-22963 https://github.com/darryk10/CVE-2022-22963 https://github.com/RanDengShiFu/CVE-2022-22963 https://github.com/me2nuk/CVE-2022-22963 https://github.com/Kirill89/CVE-2022-22963-PoC https://github.com/charis3306/CVE-2022-22963 https://github.com/HenriV-V/Exploit-for-CVE-2022-22963 https://github.com/iliass-dahman/CVE-2022-22963-POC https://github.com/lemmyz4n3771/CVE-2022-22963-PoC https • CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') CWE-917: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an Expression Language Statement ('Expression Language Injection') •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 77EXPL: 1

jackson-databind before 2.13.0 allows a Java StackOverflow exception and denial of service via a large depth of nested objects. jackson-databind versiones anteriores a 2.13.0, permite una excepción Java StackOverflow y una denegación de servicio por medio de una gran profundidad de objetos anidados A flaw was found in the Jackson Databind package. This cause of the issue is due to a Java StackOverflow exception and a denial of service via a significant depth of nested objects. • https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/issues/2816 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/05/msg00001.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/11/msg00035.html https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220506-0004 https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5283 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-36518 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 2%CPEs: 37EXPL: 0

The fix for bug 63362 present in Apache Tomcat 10.1.0-M1 to 10.1.0-M5, 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.11, 9.0.40 to 9.0.53 and 8.5.60 to 8.5.71 introduced a memory leak. The object introduced to collect metrics for HTTP upgrade connections was not released for WebSocket connections once the connection was closed. This created a memory leak that, over time, could lead to a denial of service via an OutOfMemoryError. La corrección del bug 63362 presente en Apache Tomcat versiones 10.1.0-M1 hasta 10.1.0-M5, versiones 10.0.0-M1 hasta 10.0.11, versiones 9.0.40 hasta 9.0.53 y versiones 8.5.60 hasta 8.5.71, introducía una pérdida de memoria. El objeto introducido para recopilar métricas para las conexiones de actualización HTTP no se liberaba para las conexiones WebSocket una vez que se cerraba la conexión. • https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10379 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r8097a2d1550aa78e585fc77e602b9046e6d4099d8d132497c5387784%40%3Ccommits.myfaces.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r83a35be60f06aca2065f188ee542b9099695d57ced2e70e0885f905c%40%3Cannounce.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202208-34 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20211104-0001 https://www.debian.org/security/2021/dsa-5009 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://www • CWE-772: Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime •

CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 14%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0

Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.6, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.46 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.66 did not correctly parse the HTTP transfer-encoding request header in some circumstances leading to the possibility to request smuggling when used with a reverse proxy. Specifically: - Tomcat incorrectly ignored the transfer encoding header if the client declared it would only accept an HTTP/1.0 response; - Tomcat honoured the identify encoding; and - Tomcat did not ensure that, if present, the chunked encoding was the final encoding. Apache Tomcat versiones 10.0.0-M1 hasta 10.0.6, versiones 9.0.0.M1 hasta 9.0.46 y versiones 8.5.0 hasta 8.5.66, no analizaban correctamente el encabezado de petición HTTP transfer-encoding en algunas circunstancias, conllevando a la posibilidad de contrabando de peticiones cuando se usaba con un proxy inverso. Específicamente: - Tomcat ignoraba incorrectamente el encabezado de codificación de transferencia si el cliente declaraba que sólo aceptaría una respuesta HTTP/1.0; - Tomcat honraba la codificación de identificación; y - Tomcat no se aseguraba de que, si estaba presente, la codificación en trozos fuera la codificación final • https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10366 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r290aee55b72811fd19e75ac80f6143716c079170c5671b96932ed44b%40%3Ccommits.tomee.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r40f921575aee8d7d34e53182f862c45cbb8f3d898c9d4e865c2ec262%40%3Ccommits.tomee.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r612a79269b0d5e5780c62dfd34286a8037232fec0bc6f1a7e60c9381%40%3Cannounce.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc6ef52453bb996a98cb45442871a1db56b7c349939e45d829bf9ae37%40%3Ccommits.tomee.apache.org%3E https:/ • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •