16 results (0.005 seconds)

CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

WebAuthn4J Spring Security provides Web Authentication specification support for Spring applications. Affected versions are subject to improper signature counter value handling. A flaw was found in webauthn4j-spring-security-core. When an authneticator returns an incremented signature counter value during authentication, webauthn4j-spring-security-core does not properly persist the value, which means cloned authenticator detection does not work. An attacker who cloned valid authenticator in some way can use the cloned authenticator without being detected. • https://github.com/webauthn4j/webauthn4j-spring-security/commit/129700d74d83f9b9a82bf88ebc63707e3cb0a725 https://github.com/webauthn4j/webauthn4j-spring-security/security/advisories/GHSA-v9hx-v6vf-g36j https://www.w3.org/TR/2021/REC-webauthn-2-20210408/#sctn-sign-counter • CWE-287: Improper Authentication •

CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0

Spring Security versions 5.5.x prior to 5.5.7, 5.6.x prior to 5.6.4, and earlier unsupported versions contain an integer overflow vulnerability. When using the BCrypt class with the maximum work factor (31), the encoder does not perform any salt rounds, due to an integer overflow error. The default settings are not affected by this CVE. Spring Security versiones 5.5.x anteriores a 5.5.7, 5.6.x anteriores a 5.6.4 y versiones anteriores no soportadas, contienen una vulnerabilidad de desbordamiento de enteros. Cuando es usada la clase BCrypt con el máximo factor de trabajo (31), el codificador no lleva a cabo ninguna ronda salt, debido a un error de desbordamiento de enteros. • https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220707-0003 https://tanzu.vmware.com/security/cve-2022-22976 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-22976 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2087214 • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 6

In spring security versions prior to 5.4.11+, 5.5.7+ , 5.6.4+ and older unsupported versions, RegexRequestMatcher can easily be misconfigured to be bypassed on some servlet containers. Applications using RegexRequestMatcher with `.` in the regular expression are possibly vulnerable to an authorization bypass. En las versiones 5.5.6 y 5.6.3 de Spring Security y en versiones anteriores no soportadas, RegexRequestMatcher puede ser fácilmente configurado de forma incorrecta para ser evitado en algunos contenedores de servlets. Las aplicaciones que utilizan RegexRequestMatcher con `.` en la expresión regular son posiblemente vulnerables a un bypass de autorización A flaw was found in Spring Security. When using RegexRequestMatcher, an easy misconfiguration can bypass some servlet containers. • https://github.com/DeEpinGh0st/CVE-2022-22978 https://github.com/ducluongtran9121/CVE-2022-22978-PoC https://github.com/aeifkz/CVE-2022-22978 https://github.com/umakant76705/CVE-2022-22978 https://github.com/Raghvendra1207/CVE-2022-22978 https://github.com/wan9xx/CVE-2022-22978-demo https://spring.io/security/cve-2022-22978 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-22978 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2087606 • CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization CWE-1220: Insufficient Granularity of Access Control •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0

Spring Security versions 5.5.x prior to 5.5.1, 5.4.x prior to 5.4.7, 5.3.x prior to 5.3.10 and 5.2.x prior to 5.2.11 are susceptible to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) attack via the initiation of the Authorization Request in an OAuth 2.0 Client Web and WebFlux application. A malicious user or attacker can send multiple requests initiating the Authorization Request for the Authorization Code Grant, which has the potential of exhausting system resources using a single session or multiple sessions. Spring Security versiones 5.5.x anteriores a 5.5.1, versiones 5.4.x anteriores a 5.4.7, versiones 5.3.x anteriores a 5.3.10 y versiones 5.2.x anteriores a 5.2.11 son susceptibles a un ataque de Denegación de Servicio (DoS) por medio de la iniciación de la Petición de Autorización en una Aplicación OAuth versión 2.0 Client Web y WebFlux. Un usuario o atacante malicioso puede enviar múltiples peticiones iniciando la Petición de Autorización para la Concesión del Código de Autorización, lo que tiene el potencial de agotar los recursos del sistema usando una sola sesión o múltiples sesiones • https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r08a449010786e0bcffa4b5781b04fcb55d6eafa62cb79b8347680aad%40%3Cissues.nifi.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r163b3e4e39803882f5be05ee8606b2b9812920e196daa2a82997ce14%40%3Cpluto-dev.portals.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r3868207b967f926819fe3aa8d33f1666429be589bb4a62104a49f4e3%40%3Cpluto-dev.portals.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r390783b3b1c59b978131ac08390bf77fbb3863270cbde59d5b0f5fde%40%3Cpluto-dev.portals.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r89aa1b48a827f5641310305214547f1d6b21 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization •

CVSS: 9.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0

Spring Security 5.4.x prior to 5.4.4, 5.3.x prior to 5.3.8.RELEASE, 5.2.x prior to 5.2.9.RELEASE, and older unsupported versions can fail to save the SecurityContext if it is changed more than once in a single request.A malicious user cannot cause the bug to happen (it must be programmed in). However, if the application's intent is to only allow the user to run with elevated privileges in a small portion of the application, the bug can be leveraged to extend those privileges to the rest of the application. Spring Security versiones 5.4.x anteriores a 5.4.4, versiones 5.3.x anteriores a 5.3.8.RELEASE, versiones 5.2.x anteriores a 5.2.9.RELEASE, y versiones anteriores no compatibles, pueden producir un fallo al guardar el SecurityContext si se cambia más de una vez en una sola petición. Un usuario malicioso no puede causar el error (debe estar programado). Sin embargo, si la intención de la aplicación es sólo permitir que el usuario solo se ejecute con privilegios elevados en una pequeña parte de la aplicación, el error puede ser aprovechado para extender esos privilegios al resto de la aplicación • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/02/19/7 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r163b3e4e39803882f5be05ee8606b2b9812920e196daa2a82997ce14%40%3Cpluto-dev.portals.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r2cb05e499807900ba23e539643eead9c5f0652fd271f223f89da1804%40%3Cpluto-scm.portals.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r37423ec7eea340e92a409452c35b649dce02fdc467f0b3f52086c177%40%3Cpluto-dev.portals.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r3868207b967f926819fe3aa8d33f1666429be589bb4a62104a49f4e3%40%3Cpluto-dev.portals.apache. •