CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 94%CPEs: 444EXPL: 17CVE-2023-44487 – HTTP/2 Rapid Reset Attack Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-44487
10 Oct 2023 — The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023. El protocolo HTTP/2 permite una denegación de servicio (consumo de recursos del servidor) porque la cancelación de solicitudes puede restablecer muchas transmisiones rápidamente, como se explotó en la naturaleza entre agosto y octubre de 2023. A flaw was found in handling multiplexed streams in the HTTP/2 protocol. ... • https://github.com/imabee101/CVE-2023-44487 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 76%CPEs: 72EXPL: 1CVE-2021-4104 – Deserialization of untrusted data in JMSAppender in Apache Log4j 1.2
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-4104
14 Dec 2021 — JMSAppender in Log4j 1.2 is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration. The attacker can provide TopicBindingName and TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configurations causing JMSAppender to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-44228. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.2 when specifically configured to use JMSAppender, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in Au... • https://github.com/cckuailong/log4shell_1.x • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVSS: 8.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 34EXPL: 0CVE-2021-3517 – libxml2: Heap-based buffer overflow in xmlEncodeEntitiesInternal() in entities.c
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-3517
19 May 2021 — There is a flaw in the xml entity encoding functionality of libxml2 in versions before 2.9.11. An attacker who is able to supply a crafted file to be processed by an application linked with the affected functionality of libxml2 could trigger an out-of-bounds read. The most likely impact of this flaw is to application availability, with some potential impact to confidentiality and integrity if an attacker is able to use memory information to further exploit the application. Se presenta un fallo en la funcion... • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954232 • CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 7%CPEs: 9EXPL: 0CVE-2020-25710 – openldap: assertion failure in CSN normalization with invalid input
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-25710
28 Nov 2020 — A flaw was found in OpenLDAP in versions before 2.4.56. This flaw allows an attacker who sends a malicious packet processed by OpenLDAP to force a failed assertion in csnNormalize23(). The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability. Se encontró un fallo en OpenLDAP en versiones anteriores a 2.4.56. Este fallo permite a un atacante que envía un paquete malicioso procesado por OpenLDAP forzar una afirmación fallida en la función csnNormalize23(). • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899678 • CWE-617: Reachable Assertion •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 9EXPL: 0CVE-2012-5626
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2012-5626
23 Jan 2020 — EJB method in Red Hat JBoss BRMS 5; Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 5; Red Hat JBoss Operations Network 3.1; Red Hat JBoss Portal 4 and 5; Red Hat JBoss SOA Platform 4.2, 4.3, and 5; in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Web Server 1 ignores roles specified using the @RunAs annotation. El método EJB en Red Hat JBoss BRMS versión 5; Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform versión 5; Red Hat JBoss Operations Network versión 3.1; Red Hat JBoss Portal versiones 4 y 5; Red Hat JBoss SOA Platform versio... • https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2012-5626 •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 20%CPEs: 39EXPL: 1CVE-2019-9511 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9511
13 Aug 2019 — Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a la manip... • https://github.com/flyniu666/ingress-nginx-0.21-1.19.5 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 3%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9513 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9513
13 Aug 2019 — Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker creates multiple request streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way that causes substantial churn to the priority tree. This can consume excess CPU. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a los bucles de recursos, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. El atacante crea múltiples flujos de solicitud y baraja continuamente la prioridad de ... • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 2%CPEs: 44EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9515 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9515
13 Aug 2019 — Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a una inundación de configuraciones, lo... • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 2%CPEs: 39EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9516 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a header leak, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9516
13 Aug 2019 — Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a header leak, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of headers with a 0-length header name and 0-length header value, optionally Huffman encoded into 1-byte or greater headers. Some implementations allocate memory for these headers and keep the allocation alive until the session dies. This can consume excess memory. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a una fuga de encabezado, lo que puede conducir a una denega... • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 4%CPEs: 43EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9517 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to unconstrained interal data buffering, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9517
13 Aug 2019 — Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to unconstrained interal data buffering, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens the HTTP/2 window so the peer can send without constraint; however, they leave the TCP window closed so the peer cannot actually write (many of) the bytes on the wire. The attacker then sends a stream of requests for a large response object. Depending on how the servers queue the responses, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. Algunas implementaciones HT... • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00004.html • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •