3 results (0.007 seconds)

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 8%CPEs: 50EXPL: 0

The in-memory certificate cache in strongSwan before 5.9.4 has a remote integer overflow upon receiving many requests with different certificates to fill the cache and later trigger the replacement of cache entries. The code attempts to select a less-often-used cache entry by means of a random number generator, but this is not done correctly. Remote code execution might be a slight possibility. La caché de certificados en memoria en strongSwan versiones anteriores a 5.9.4, presenta un desbordamiento de enteros remoto al recibir muchas peticiones con diferentes certificados para llenar la caché y posteriormente desencadenar la sustitución de las entradas de la caché. El código intenta seleccionar una entrada de caché menos usada mediante un generador de números aleatorios, pero esto no es realizado correctamente. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-539476.pdf https://github.com/strongswan/strongswan/releases/tag/5.9.4 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/10/msg00014.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5FJSATD2R2XHTG4P63GCMQ2N7EWKMME5 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WQSQ3BEC22NF4NCDZVCT4P3Q2ZIAJXGJ https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/mes • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 205EXPL: 0

An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/1 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/4 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-772220.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=fb9fa6b51defd48157eeb207f52181f735d96148 https://kb.pulse • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •

CVSS: 7.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 209EXPL: 0

Specially crafted PROFINET DCP broadcast packets could cause a denial of service condition of affected products on a local Ethernet segment (Layer 2). Human interaction is required to recover the systems. PROFIBUS interfaces are not affected. Los paquetes de difusión PROFINET DCP especialmente elaborados podrían causar una condición de denegación de servicio de los productos afectados en un segmento Ethernet local (capa 2). Se requiere la interacción humana para recuperar los sistemas. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98369 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038463 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-284673.html https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-293562.html https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-546832.html https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-284673.pdf https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-293562.pdf https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-546832.pdf https://ics-cert.us- • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •