15 results (0.008 seconds)

CVSS: 4.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

An improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (Path Traversal) vulnerability in SonicWall Email Security Appliance could allow a remote attacker with administrative privileges to conduct a directory traversal attack and delete arbitrary files from the appliance file system. Una vulnerabilidad de limitación inadecuada de un nombre de ruta a un directorio restringido (Path Traversal) en SonicWall Email Security Appliance podría permitir que un atacante remoto con privilegios administrativos lleve a cabo un ataque directory traversal y elimine archivos arbitrarios del sistema de archivos del dispositivo. • https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2024-0006 • CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') CWE-23: Relative Path Traversal •

CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

SonicWall Email Security contains a vulnerability that could permit a remote unauthenticated attacker access to an error page that includes sensitive information about users email addresses. • https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2023-0002 • CWE-209: Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

Improperly Implemented Security Check vulnerability in the SonicWall Hosted Email Security leads to bypass of Capture ATP security service in the appliance. This vulnerability impacts 10.0.17.7319 and earlier versions Una vulnerabilidad de Comprobación de Seguridad Implementada Inapropiadamente en SonicWall Hosted Email Security conlleva a una omisión del servicio de seguridad Capture ATP en el dispositivo. Esta vulnerabilidad afecta a versiones 10.0.17.7319 y anteriores • https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2022-0014 • CWE-290: Authentication Bypass by Spoofing CWE-358: Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard •

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 96%CPEs: 213EXPL: 7

Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1. Apache Log4j2 versiones 2.0-alpha1 hasta 2.16.0 (excluyendo las versiones 2.12.3 y 2.3.1) no protegían de la recursión no controlada de las búsquedas autorreferenciales. Esto permite a un atacante con control sobre los datos de Thread Context Map causar una denegación de servicio cuando es interpretada una cadena diseñada. • https://github.com/thedevappsecguy/Log4J-Mitigation-CVE-2021-44228--CVE-2021-45046--CVE-2021-45105--CVE-2021-44832 https://github.com/tejas-nagchandi/CVE-2021-45105 https://github.com/pravin-pp/log4j2-CVE-2021-45105 https://github.com/dileepdkumar/https-github.com-pravin-pp-log4j2-CVE-2021-45105-1 https://github.com/dileepdkumar/https-github.com-pravin-pp-log4j2-CVE-2021-45105 https://github.com/dileepdkumar/https-github.com-dileepdkumar-https-github.com-pravin-pp-log4j2-CVE-2021-45105-v htt • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-674: Uncontrolled Recursion •

CVSS: 9.0EPSS: 97%CPEs: 96EXPL: 4

It was found that the fix to address CVE-2021-44228 in Apache Log4j 2.15.0 was incomplete in certain non-default configurations. This could allows attackers with control over Thread Context Map (MDC) input data when the logging configuration uses a non-default Pattern Layout with either a Context Lookup (for example, $${ctx:loginId}) or a Thread Context Map pattern (%X, %mdc, or %MDC) to craft malicious input data using a JNDI Lookup pattern resulting in an information leak and remote code execution in some environments and local code execution in all environments. Log4j 2.16.0 (Java 8) and 2.12.2 (Java 7) fix this issue by removing support for message lookup patterns and disabling JNDI functionality by default. Se descubrió que la corrección para abordar CVE-2021-44228 en Apache Log4j versiones 2.15.0 estaba incompleta en ciertas configuraciones no predeterminadas. Esto podría permitir a los atacantes con control sobre los datos de entrada de Thread Context Map (MDC) cuando la configuración de registro utiliza un Pattern Layout no predeterminado con un Context Lookup (por ejemplo, $${ctx:loginId}) o un Thread Context Map pattern (%X, %mdc, o %MDC) para elaborar datos de entrada maliciosos utilizando un patrón JNDI Lookup que resulta en una fuga de información y ejecución de código remoto en algunos entornos y ejecución de código local en todos los entornos. • https://github.com/BobTheShoplifter/CVE-2021-45046-Info https://github.com/thedevappsecguy/Log4J-Mitigation-CVE-2021-44228--CVE-2021-45046--CVE-2021-45105--CVE-2021-44832 https://github.com/tejas-nagchandi/CVE-2021-45046 https://github.com/pravin-pp/log4j2-CVE-2021-45046 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/12/14/4 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/12/15/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/12/18/1 https://cert-portal.siemen • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-917: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an Expression Language Statement ('Expression Language Injection') •