5 results (0.005 seconds)

CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 21%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0

Stack-based buffer overflow in SonicWALL SSL-VPN End-Point Interrogator/Installer ActiveX control (Aventail.EPInstaller) before 10.5.2 and 10.0.5 hotfix 3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via long (1) CabURL and (2) Location arguments to the Install3rdPartyComponent method. Desbordamiento de búfer basado en pila en el control ActiveX SonicWALL SSL-VPN End-Point Interrogator/Installer anterior a v10.5.2 y v10.0.5 hotfix 3, permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código de su elección a través de los argumentos (1) CabURL y (2) Location de gran tamaño al método Install3rdPartyComponent. • http://secunia.com/advisories/41644 http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2010-117 http://software.sonicwall.com/Aventail/KB/hotfix/10.0.5/clt-hotfix-10_0_5-003.txt http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/514561/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/44535 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1024666 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/62865 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •

CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0

Multiple clientless SSL VPN products that run in web browsers, including Stonesoft StoneGate; Cisco ASA; SonicWALL E-Class SSL VPN and SonicWALL SSL VPN; SafeNet SecureWire Access Gateway; Juniper Networks Secure Access; Nortel CallPilot; Citrix Access Gateway; and other products, when running in configurations that do not restrict access to the same domain as the VPN, retrieve the content of remote URLs from one domain and rewrite them so they originate from the VPN's domain, which violates the same origin policy and allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting attacks, read cookies that originated from other domains, access the Web VPN session to gain access to internal resources, perform key logging, and conduct other attacks. NOTE: it could be argued that this is a fundamental design problem in any clientless VPN solution, as opposed to a commonly-introduced error that can be fixed in separate implementations. Therefore a single CVE has been assigned for all products that have this design. Múltiples productos VPN de SSL sin cliente que se ejecutan en navegadores web, incluyendo StoneGate de Stonesoft; ASA de Cisco; E-Class SSL VPN de SonicWALL y SSL VPN de SonicWALL; SecureWire Access Gateway de SafeNet; Networks Secure Access de Juniper; CallPilot de Nortel; Access Gateway de Citrix; y otros productos, cuando se ejecutan en configuraciones que no restringen el acceso al mismo dominio que la VPN, recuperan el contenido de las direcciones URL remotas de un dominio y las reescriben para que se originen desde el dominio de la VPN, lo que viola la política del mismo origen y permite a atacantes remotos conducir ataques de tipo cross-site scripting, leer cookies que se originaron desde otros dominios, acceder a la sesión de VPN web para conseguir acceso a los recursos internos, realizar el registro de claves y conducir otros ataques. NOTA: se podría argumentar que se trata de un problema de diseño fundamental en cualquier solución VPN sin cliente, a diferencia de un error comúnmente introducido que puede ser corregido en implementaciones separadas. • http://kb.juniper.net/KB15799 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2006/Jun/238 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2006/Jun/269 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2006/Jun/270 http://secunia.com/advisories/37696 http://secunia.com/advisories/37786 http://secunia.com/advisories/37788 http://secunia.com/advisories/37789 http://securitytracker.com/id?1023255 http://support.nortel.com/go/main.jsp?cscat=BLTNDETAIL&DocumentOID=984744 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/261869 http:/ • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls •

CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 8%CPEs: 2EXPL: 1

Multiple buffer overflows in the SonicWall SSL-VPN NetExtender NELaunchCtrl ActiveX control before 2.1.0.51, and 2.5.x before 2.5.0.56, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long (1) serverAddress, (2) sessionId, (3) clientIPLower, (4) clientIPHigher, (5) userName, (6) domainName, or (7) dnsSuffix Unicode property value. NOTE: the AddRouteEntry vector is covered by CVE-2007-5603. Múltiples desbordamientos de búfer en el control de ActiveX onicWall SSL-VPN NetExtender NELaunchCtrl anterior al 2.1.0.51, y el 2.5.x anterior al 2.5.0.56, permiten a atacantes remotos ejecutar código de su elección a través de valores largos de las propiedades (1) serverAddress, (2) sessionId, (3) clientIPLower, (4) clientIPHigher, (5) userName, (6) domainName o (7) dnsSuffix. NOTA: el vector AddRouteEntry queda cubierta por la CVE-2007-5603. • http://secunia.com/advisories/27469 http://securityreason.com/securityalert/3342 http://www.sec-consult.com/303.html http://www.sec-consult.com/fileadmin/Advisories/20071101-0_sonicwall_multiple.txt http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/483097/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/26288 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/3696 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/38220 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •

CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 86%CPEs: 2EXPL: 3

Stack-based buffer overflow in the SonicWall SSL-VPN NetExtender NELaunchCtrl ActiveX control before 2.1.0.51, and 2.5.x before 2.5.0.56, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long string in the second argument to the AddRouteEntry method. Desbordamiento de búfer basado en pila en el control ActiveX SonicWall SSL-VPN NetExtender NELaunchCtrl anterior a 2.1.0.51, y 2.5.x anterior a 2.5.0.56, permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código de su elección mediante una cadena larga en el segundo argumento del método AddRouteEntry. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/4594 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/16616 http://secunia.com/advisories/27469 http://securityreason.com/securityalert/3342 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/298521 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/WDON-78K56M http://www.sec-consult.com/303.html http://www.sec-consult.com/fileadmin/Advisories/20071101-0_sonicwall_multiple.txt http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/483097/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/26288 http • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 7%CPEs: 2EXPL: 3

Absolute path traversal vulnerability in the WebCacheCleaner ActiveX control 1.3.0.3 in SonicWall SSL-VPN 200 before 2.1, and SSL-VPN 2000/4000 before 2.5, allows remote attackers to delete arbitrary files via a full pathname in the argument to the FileDelete method. Vulnerabilidad de salto de directorio absoluto en el control ActiveX WebCacheCleaner .13.0.3 de SonicWall SSL-VPN 200 anterior a 2.1, y SSL-VPN 2000/4000 anterior a 2.5, permite a atacantes remotos borrar archivos de su elección mediante un nombre de ruta completo en el argumento del método FileDelete. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/30730 http://secunia.com/advisories/27469 http://securityreason.com/securityalert/3342 http://www.sec-consult.com/303.html http://www.sec-consult.com/fileadmin/Advisories/20071101-0_sonicwall_multiple.txt http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/483097/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/26288 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/3696 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/38221 • CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') •