14 results (0.049 seconds)

CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0

An issue was discovered in Stormshield Network Security (SNS) 3.7.0 through 3.7.39, 3.11.0 through 3.11.27, 4.3.0 through 4.3.22, 4.6.0 through 4.6.9, and 4.7.0 through 4.7.1. It's possible to know if a specific user account exists on the SNS firewall by using remote access commands. Se descubrió un problema en Stormshield Network Security (SNS) 3.7.0 a 3.7.39, 3.11.0 a 3.11.27, 4.3.0 a 4.3.22, 4.6.0 a 4.6.9 y 4.7.0 a 4.7. 1. Es posible saber si existe una cuenta de usuario específica en el firewall SNS mediante comandos de acceso remoto. • https://advisories.stormshield.eu/2023-027 •

CVSS: 4.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0

An issue was discovered in Stormshield SNS 3.8.0. Authenticated Stored XSS in the admin login panel leads to SSL VPN credential theft. A malicious disclaimer file can be uploaded from the admin panel. The resulting file is rendered on the authentication interface of the admin panel. It is possible to inject malicious HTML content in order to execute JavaScript inside a victim's browser. • https://advisories.stormshield.eu/2020-011 https://twitter.com/_ACKNAK_ https://www.digitemis.com/category/blog/actualite • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •

CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 14EXPL: 2

On Feb 15, 2023, the following vulnerability in the ClamAV scanning library was disclosed: A vulnerability in the DMG file parser of ClamAV versions 1.0.0 and earlier, 0.105.1 and earlier, and 0.103.7 and earlier could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to access sensitive information on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to enabling XML entity substitution that may result in XML external entity injection. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by submitting a crafted DMG file to be scanned by ClamAV on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to leak bytes from any file that may be read by the ClamAV scanning process. • https://github.com/nokn0wthing/CVE-2023-20052 https://github.com/cY83rR0H1t/CVE-2023-20052 https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-clamav-xxe-TcSZduhN • CWE-611: Improper Restriction of XML External Entity Reference CWE-776: Improper Restriction of Recursive Entity References in DTDs ('XML Entity Expansion') •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 18EXPL: 0

On Feb 15, 2023, the following vulnerability in the ClamAV scanning library was disclosed: A vulnerability in the HFS+ partition file parser of ClamAV versions 1.0.0 and earlier, 0.105.1 and earlier, and 0.103.7 and earlier could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code. This vulnerability is due to a missing buffer size check that may result in a heap buffer overflow write. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by submitting a crafted HFS+ partition file to be scanned by ClamAV on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the ClamAV scanning process, or else crash the process, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. For a description of this vulnerability, see the ClamAV blog ["https://blog.clamav.net/"]. • https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-clamav-q8DThCy • CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •

CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 9EXPL: 0

There is a type confusion vulnerability relating to X.400 address processing inside an X.509 GeneralName. X.400 addresses were parsed as an ASN1_STRING but the public structure definition for GENERAL_NAME incorrectly specified the type of the x400Address field as ASN1_TYPE. This field is subsequently interpreted by the OpenSSL function GENERAL_NAME_cmp as an ASN1_TYPE rather than an ASN1_STRING. When CRL checking is enabled (i.e. the application sets the X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK flag), this vulnerability may allow an attacker to pass arbitrary pointers to a memcmp call, enabling them to read memory contents or enact a denial of service. In most cases, the attack requires the attacker to provide both the certificate chain and CRL, neither of which need to have a valid signature. If the attacker only controls one of these inputs, the other input must already contain an X.400 address as a CRL distribution point, which is uncommon. • https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/LibreSSL/libressl-3.6.2-relnotes.txt https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/7.2/common/018_x509.patch.sig https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=2c6c9d439b484e1ba9830d8454a34fa4f80fdfe9 https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=2f7530077e0ef79d98718138716bc51ca0cad658 https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fd2af07dc083a350c959147097003a14a5e8ac4d https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08 https://www.open • CWE-704: Incorrect Type Conversion or Cast CWE-843: Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion') •