184 results (0.032 seconds)

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 2%CPEs: 9EXPL: 2

The Service Location Protocol (SLP, RFC 2608) allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to register arbitrary services. This could allow the attacker to use spoofed UDP traffic to conduct a denial-of-service attack with a significant amplification factor. The Service Location Protocol (SLP) contains a denial-of-service (DoS) vulnerability that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to register services and use spoofed UDP traffic to conduct a denial-of-service (DoS) attack with a significant amplification factor. • https://blogs.vmware.com/security/2023/04/vmware-response-to-cve-2023-29552-reflective-denial-of-service-dos-amplification-vulnerability-in-slp.html https://curesec.com/blog/article/CVE-2023-29552-Service-Location-Protocol-Denial-of-Service-Amplification-Attack-212.html https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2608 https://github.com/curesec/slpload https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230426-0001 https://www.bitsight.com/blog/new-high-severity-vulnerability-cve-2023-29552-discovered-service-location-protoco •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 60EXPL: 0

In cifs-utils through 6.14, a stack-based buffer overflow when parsing the mount.cifs ip= command-line argument could lead to local attackers gaining root privileges. En cifs-utils versiones hasta 6.14, un desbordamiento del búfer en la región stack de la memoria cuando es analizado el argumento de línea de comandos mount.cifs ip= podría conllevar a que atacantes locales obtuvieran privilegios de root • http://wiki.robotz.com/index.php/Linux_CIFS_Utils_and_Samba https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15025 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197216 https://github.com/piastry/cifs-utils/pull/7 https://github.com/piastry/cifs-utils/pull/7/commits/955fb147e97a6a74e1aaa65766de91e2c1479765 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/05/msg00020.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5WBOLMANBYJILXQKRRK7OCR774PXJAYY https://lists& • CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 11EXPL: 1

An issue was discovered in Cobbler before 3.3.1. In the templar.py file, the function check_for_invalid_imports can allow Cheetah code to import Python modules via the "#from MODULE import" substring. (Only lines beginning with #import are blocked.) Se ha detectado un problema en Cobbler versiones hasta 3.3.0. En el archivo templar.py, la función check_for_invalid_imports puede permitir que el código Cheetah importe módulos de Python por medio de la subcadena "#from MODULE import". • https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193678 https://github.com/cobbler/cobbler/releases https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TEJN7CPW6YCHBFQPFZKGA6AVA6T5NPIW https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Z5CSXQE7Q4TVDQJKFYBO4XDH3BZ7BLAR https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZCXMOUW4DH4DYWIJN44SMSU6R3CZDZBE • CWE-77: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 60EXPL: 1

The Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Protocol allows remote attackers (from the client side) to send arbitrary numbers that are actually not public keys, and trigger expensive server-side DHE modular-exponentiation calculations, aka a D(HE)at or D(HE)ater attack. The client needs very little CPU resources and network bandwidth. The attack may be more disruptive in cases where a client can require a server to select its largest supported key size. The basic attack scenario is that the client must claim that it can only communicate with DHE, and the server must be configured to allow DHE. El Protocolo de Acuerdo de Claves Diffie-Hellman permite a atacantes remotos (del lado del cliente) enviar números arbitrarios que en realidad no son claves públicas, y desencadenar costosos cálculos de exponenciación modular DHE del lado del servidor, también se conoce como un ataque D(HE)ater. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-506569.pdf https://dheatattack.com https://dheatattack.gitlab.io https://github.com/Balasys/dheater https://github.com/mozilla/ssl-config-generator/issues/162 https://gitlab.com/dheatattack/dheater https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10374117 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K83120834 https://www.arubanetworks.com/assets/alert/ARUBA-PSA-2022-004.txt https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2022/10/21/tls-groups-configuration https: • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •

CVSS: 7.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 6EXPL: 0

lrzsz before version 0.12.21~rc can leak information to the receiving side due to an incorrect length check in the function zsdata that causes a size_t to wrap around. lrzsz versiones anteriores a 0.12.21~rc, puede filtrar información al lado receptor debido a una comprobación de longitud incorrecta en la función zsdata que causa que size_t se envuelva • http://www.ohse.de/uwe/software/lrzsz.html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1572058 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/01/msg00027.html https://lists.suse.com/pipermail/sle-security-updates/2018-April/003955.html?_ga=2.81625751.1026327980.1622040648-1950393542.1547130931 https://lists.suse.com/pipermail/sle-security-updates/2018-April/003956.html?_ga=2.81625751.1026327980.1622040648-1950393542.1547130931 • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •