CVSS: 5.6EPSS: 97%CPEs: 1467EXPL: 3CVE-2017-5753 – Multiple CPUs - 'Spectre' Information Disclosure
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-5753
Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and branch prediction may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis. Los sistemas con microprocesadores con ejecución especulativa y predicción de ramas podrían permitir la revelación no autorizada de información al atacante con acceso de usuario local mediante un análisis de un canal lateral. An industry-wide issue was found in the way many modern microprocessor designs have implemented speculative execution of instructions (a commonly used performance optimization). There are three primary variants of the issue which differ in the way the speculative execution can be exploited. Variant CVE-2017-5753 triggers the speculative execution by performing a bounds-check bypass. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/43427 https://github.com/sachinthaBS/Spectre-Vulnerability-CVE-2017-5753- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-01/msg00006.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-01/msg00007.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-01/msg00008.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-01/msg00014.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-01/msg00016.html http://nvidia.custhe • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 52EXPL: 3CVE-2017-1000366 – Linux Kernel (Debian 9/10 / Ubuntu 14.04.5/16.04.2/17.04 / Fedora 23/24/25) - 'ldso_dynamic Stack Clash' Local Privilege Escalation
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-1000366
glibc contains a vulnerability that allows specially crafted LD_LIBRARY_PATH values to manipulate the heap/stack, causing them to alias, potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution. Please note that additional hardening changes have been made to glibc to prevent manipulation of stack and heap memory but these issues are not directly exploitable, as such they have not been given a CVE. This affects glibc 2.25 and earlier. Glibc contiene una vulnerabilidad que permite que los valores LD_LIBRARY_PATH especialmente creados para manipular la región heap/stack de la memoria, generando entonces un alias, lo que podría conllevar a la ejecución del código arbitrario. Tenga en cuenta que se han realizado cambios de refuerzo adicionales en glibc para evitar la manipulación del stack y heap de la memoria de almacenamiento dinámico, pero estos problemas no se pueden explotar directamente, por lo que no se les ha otorgado un CVE. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/42276 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/42274 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/42275 http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/154361/Cisco-Device-Hardcoded-Credentials-GNU-glibc-BusyBox.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Sep/7 http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3887 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/99127 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038712 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1479 https://access.redhat.com/errata/ • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 74%CPEs: 24EXPL: 0CVE-2016-5118 – ImageMagick: Remote code execution via filename
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-5118
The OpenBlob function in blob.c in GraphicsMagick before 1.3.24 and ImageMagick allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a | (pipe) character at the start of a filename. La función OpenBlob en blob.c en GraphicsMagick en versiones anteriores a 1.3.24 y ImageMagick permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario a través del caractér | (tubería) en el inicio del nombre de archivo. It was discovered that ImageMagick did not properly sanitize certain input before using it to invoke processes. A remote attacker could create a specially crafted image that, when processed by an application using ImageMagick or an unsuspecting user using the ImageMagick utilities, would lead to arbitrary execution of shell commands with the privileges of the user running the application. • http://git.imagemagick.org/repos/ImageMagick/commit/40639d173aa8c76b850d625c630b711fee4dcfb8 http://hg.code.sf.net/p/graphicsmagick/code/file/41876934e762/ChangeLog http://hg.code.sf.net/p/graphicsmagick/code/rev/ae3928faa858 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-06/msg00008.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-06/msg00009.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-06/msg00011.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-06/msg0002 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 81%CPEs: 84EXPL: 2CVE-2016-3715 – ImageMagick Arbitrary File Deletion Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-3715
The EPHEMERAL coder in ImageMagick before 6.9.3-10 and 7.x before 7.0.1-1 allows remote attackers to delete arbitrary files via a crafted image. El codificador EPHEMERAL en ImageMagick en versiones anteriores a 6.9.3-10 y 7.x en versiones anteriores a 7.0.1-1 permite a atacantes remotos eliminar archivos arbitrarios a través de una imagen manipulada. It was discovered that certain ImageMagick coders and pseudo-protocols did not properly prevent security sensitive operations when processing specially crafted images. A remote attacker could create a specially crafted image that, when processed by an application using ImageMagick or an unsuspecting user using the ImageMagick utilities, would allow the attacker to delete arbitrary files. ImageMagick contains an unspecified vulnerability that could allow users to delete files by using ImageMagick's 'ephemeral' pseudo protocol, which deletes files after reading. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39767 http://git.imagemagick.org/repos/ImageMagick/blob/a01518e08c840577cabd7d3ff291a9ba735f7276/ChangeLog http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00024.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00025.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00028.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00051.html http&# • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 93%CPEs: 84EXPL: 1CVE-2016-3718 – ImageMagick Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-3718
The (1) HTTP and (2) FTP coders in ImageMagick before 6.9.3-10 and 7.x before 7.0.1-1 allow remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted image. Los codificadores (1) HTTP y (2) FTP en ImageMagick en versiones anteriores a 6.9.3-10 y 7.x en versiones anteriores a 7.0.1-1 permiten a atacantes remotos llevar a cabo ataques de falsificación de peticiones del lado del servidor (SSRF) a través de una imagen manipulada. A server-side request forgery flaw was discovered in the way ImageMagick processed certain images. A remote attacker could exploit this flaw to mislead an application using ImageMagick or an unsuspecting user using the ImageMagick utilities into, for example, performing HTTP(S) requests or opening FTP sessions via specially crafted images. ImageMagick contains an unspecified vulnerability that allows attackers to perform server-side request forgery (SSRF) via a crafted image. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39767 http://git.imagemagick.org/repos/ImageMagick/blob/a01518e08c840577cabd7d3ff291a9ba735f7276/ChangeLog http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00024.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00025.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00028.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00051.html http&# • CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) •