CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 6CVE-2022-22978 – springframework: Authorization Bypass in RegexRequestMatcher
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-22978
In spring security versions prior to 5.4.11+, 5.5.7+ , 5.6.4+ and older unsupported versions, RegexRequestMatcher can easily be misconfigured to be bypassed on some servlet containers. Applications using RegexRequestMatcher with `.` in the regular expression are possibly vulnerable to an authorization bypass. En las versiones 5.5.6 y 5.6.3 de Spring Security y en versiones anteriores no soportadas, RegexRequestMatcher puede ser fácilmente configurado de forma incorrecta para ser evitado en algunos contenedores de servlets. Las aplicaciones que utilizan RegexRequestMatcher con `.` en la expresión regular son posiblemente vulnerables a un bypass de autorización A flaw was found in Spring Security. When using RegexRequestMatcher, an easy misconfiguration can bypass some servlet containers. • https://github.com/DeEpinGh0st/CVE-2022-22978 https://github.com/ducluongtran9121/CVE-2022-22978-PoC https://github.com/aeifkz/CVE-2022-22978 https://github.com/umakant76705/CVE-2022-22978 https://github.com/Raghvendra1207/CVE-2022-22978 https://github.com/wan9xx/CVE-2022-22978-demo https://spring.io/security/cve-2022-22978 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-22978 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2087606 • CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization CWE-1220: Insufficient Granularity of Access Control •
CVSS: 9.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0CVE-2021-22112
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-22112
Spring Security 5.4.x prior to 5.4.4, 5.3.x prior to 5.3.8.RELEASE, 5.2.x prior to 5.2.9.RELEASE, and older unsupported versions can fail to save the SecurityContext if it is changed more than once in a single request.A malicious user cannot cause the bug to happen (it must be programmed in). However, if the application's intent is to only allow the user to run with elevated privileges in a small portion of the application, the bug can be leveraged to extend those privileges to the rest of the application. Spring Security versiones 5.4.x anteriores a 5.4.4, versiones 5.3.x anteriores a 5.3.8.RELEASE, versiones 5.2.x anteriores a 5.2.9.RELEASE, y versiones anteriores no compatibles, pueden producir un fallo al guardar el SecurityContext si se cambia más de una vez en una sola petición. Un usuario malicioso no puede causar el error (debe estar programado). Sin embargo, si la intención de la aplicación es sólo permitir que el usuario solo se ejecute con privilegios elevados en una pequeña parte de la aplicación, el error puede ser aprovechado para extender esos privilegios al resto de la aplicación • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/02/19/7 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r163b3e4e39803882f5be05ee8606b2b9812920e196daa2a82997ce14%40%3Cpluto-dev.portals.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r2cb05e499807900ba23e539643eead9c5f0652fd271f223f89da1804%40%3Cpluto-scm.portals.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r37423ec7eea340e92a409452c35b649dce02fdc467f0b3f52086c177%40%3Cpluto-dev.portals.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r3868207b967f926819fe3aa8d33f1666429be589bb4a62104a49f4e3%40%3Cpluto-dev.portals.apache. •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 10EXPL: 0CVE-2014-3527
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-3527
When using the CAS Proxy ticket authentication from Spring Security 3.1 to 3.2.4 a malicious CAS Service could trick another CAS Service into authenticating a proxy ticket that was not associated. This is due to the fact that the proxy ticket authentication uses the information from the HttpServletRequest which is populated based upon untrusted information within the HTTP request. This means if there are access control restrictions on which CAS services can authenticate to one another, those restrictions can be bypassed. If users are not using CAS Proxy tickets and not basing access control decisions based upon the CAS Service, then there is no impact to users. Cuando se utiliza la autenticación de tickets de Proxy CAS de Spring Security, versiones de la 3.1 a la 3.2.4, un servicio CAS malicioso permitiría engañar a otro servicio CAS para autenticar un ticket proxy que no estaba asociado. • https://pivotal.io/security/cve-2014-3527 • CWE-287: Improper Authentication •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0CVE-2014-0097
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-0097
The ActiveDirectoryLdapAuthenticator in Spring Security 3.2.0 to 3.2.1 and 3.1.0 to 3.1.5 does not check the password length. If the directory allows anonymous binds then it may incorrectly authenticate a user who supplies an empty password. El ActiveDirectoryLdapAuthenticator en Spring Security versiones de la 3.2.0 a la 3.2.1 y de la 3.1.0 a la 3.1.5 no chequea la longitud de la contraseña. Si el directorio permite enlaces anónimos entonces podría autenticar de forma incorrecta a un usuario que proporcionase una contraseña vacía. • https://pivotal.io/security/cve-2014-0097 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html • CWE-287: Improper Authentication •