CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 82EXPL: 0CVE-2005-0605 – libxpm buffer overflow
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2005-0605
scan.c for LibXPM may allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via a negative bitmap_unit value that leads to a buffer overflow. • ftp://ftp.sco.com/pub/updates/OpenServer/SCOSA-2006.5/SCOSA-2006.5.txt ftp://ftp.sco.com/pub/updates/UnixWare/SCOSA-2005.57/SCOSA-2005.57.txt ftp://patches.sgi.com/support/free/security/advisories/20060403-01-U http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83598 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83655 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2005//Aug/msg00001.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2005/Aug/msg00000.html http://secunia.c •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 8%CPEs: 40EXPL: 0CVE-2004-0914 – openmotif21 stack overflows in libxpm
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2004-0914
Multiple vulnerabilities in libXpm for 6.8.1 and earlier, as used in XFree86 and other packages, include (1) multiple integer overflows, (2) out-of-bounds memory accesses, (3) directory traversal, (4) shell metacharacter, (5) endless loops, and (6) memory leaks, which could allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information, cause a denial of service (application crash), or execute arbitrary code via a certain XPM image file. NOTE: it is highly likely that this candidate will be SPLIT into other candidates in the future, per CVE's content decisions. Múltiples vulnerabilidades en libXpm 6.8.1 y anteriores, usada en XFree86 y otros paquetes, incluyendo (1) múltiples desbordamientos de enteros, (2) accesos de memoria fuera de límites, (3) atravesamiento de directorios, (4) metacaractéres de shell, (5) bucles infinitos, y (6) filtraciones de memoria podrían permitir a atacantes remotos obtener información sensible, causar una denegación de servicio (caída de aplicación) o ejecutar código de su elección mediante un cierto fichero de imagen XPM. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-537.html http://secunia.com/advisories/13224 http://www.debian.org/security/2004/dsa-607 http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200411-28.xml http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200502-06.xml http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200502-07.xml http://www.linuxsecurity.com/content/view/106877/102 http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2004:137 http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy- •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 15%CPEs: 37EXPL: 1CVE-2002-1317 – XFree86 X11R6 3.3.x - Font Server Remote Buffer Overrun
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2002-1317
Buffer overflow in Dispatch() routine for XFS font server (fs.auto) on Solaris 2.5.1 through 9 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or execute arbitrary code via a certain XFS query. Desbordamiento de búfer en la rutina Dispatch() en el servidor de fuentes XFS (fs.auto) en Solaris 2.5.1 a 9 permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (caída) o ejecutar código arbitrario mediante una cierta petición XFS. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/22036 ftp://patches.sgi.com/support/free/security/advisories/20021202-01-I http://bvlive01.iss.net/issEn/delivery/xforce/alertdetail.jsp?oid=21541 http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=103825150527843&w=2 http://sunsolve.sun.com/pub-cgi/retrieve.pl?doc=fsalert/48879 http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-34.html http://www.ciac.org/ciac/bulletins/n-024.shtml http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/10375.php http://www.kb.cert.org •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 10EXPL: 1CVE-2000-0620
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2000-0620
libX11 X library allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a resource mask of 0, which causes libX11 to go into an infinite loop. • http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=96146116627474&w=2 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/1409 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/4996 •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 2%CPEs: 13EXPL: 2CVE-2000-0504 – Gnome 1.0/1.1 / Group X 11.0 / XFree86 X11R6 3.3.x/4.0 - Denial of Service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2000-0504
libICE in XFree86 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by specifying a large value which is not properly checked by the SKIP_STRING macro. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/20023 http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2000-06/0170.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/1369 http://www.xfree86.org/security •