CVE-2024-35944
VMCI: Fix memcpy() run-time warning in dg_dispatch_as_host()
Severity Score
Exploit Likelihood
Affected Versions
Public Exploits
0Exploited in Wild
-Decision
Descriptions
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
VMCI: Fix memcpy() run-time warning in dg_dispatch_as_host()
Syzkaller hit 'WARNING in dg_dispatch_as_host' bug.
memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 56) of single field "&dg_info->msg"
at drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c:237 (size 24)
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1555 at drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c:237
dg_dispatch_as_host+0x88e/0xa60 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c:237
Some code commentry, based on my understanding:
544 #define VMCI_DG_SIZE(_dg) (VMCI_DG_HEADERSIZE + (size_t)(_dg)->payload_size)
/// This is 24 + payload_size
memcpy(&dg_info->msg, dg, dg_size);
Destination = dg_info->msg ---> this is a 24 byte
structure(struct vmci_datagram)
Source = dg --> this is a 24 byte structure (struct vmci_datagram)
Size = dg_size = 24 + payload_size
{payload_size = 56-24 =32} -- Syzkaller managed to set payload_size to 32.
35 struct delayed_datagram_info {
36 struct datagram_entry *entry;
37 struct work_struct work;
38 bool in_dg_host_queue;
39 /* msg and msg_payload must be together. */
40 struct vmci_datagram msg;
41 u8 msg_payload[];
42 };
So those extra bytes of payload are copied into msg_payload[], a run time
warning is seen while fuzzing with Syzkaller.
One possible way to fix the warning is to split the memcpy() into
two parts -- one -- direct assignment of msg and second taking care of payload.
Gustavo quoted:
"Under FORTIFY_SOURCE we should not copy data across multiple members
in a structure."
En el kernel de Linux, se resolvió la siguiente vulnerabilidad: VMCI: corrigió la advertencia de tiempo de ejecución de memcpy() en dg_dispatch_as_host() Syzkaller presionó el error 'ADVERTENCIA en dg_dispatch_as_host'. memcpy: se detectó escritura que abarca todos los campos (tamaño 56) de un solo campo "&dg_info->msg" en drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c:237 (tamaño 24) ADVERTENCIA: CPU: 0 PID: 1555 en drivers/misc/vmw_vmci /vmci_datagram.c:237 dg_dispatch_as_host+0x88e/0xa60 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c:237 Algunos comentarios de código, según tengo entendido: 544 #define VMCI_DG_SIZE(_dg) (VMCI_DG_HEADERSIZE + (size_t)(_dg)->payload_size ) /// Esto es 24 + payload_size memcpy(&dg_info->msg, dg, dg_size); Destino = dg_info->msg ---> esta es una estructura de 24 bytes (struct vmci_datagram) Fuente = dg --> esta es una estructura de 24 bytes (struct vmci_datagram) Tamaño = dg_size = 24 + payload_size {payload_size = 56-24 = 32} -- Syzkaller logró establecer payload_size en 32. 35 struct delay_datagram_info { 36 struct datagram_entry *entry; 37 struct work_struct work; 38 bool in_dg_host_queue; 39 /* msg y msg_payload deben estar juntos. */ 40 struct vmci_datagram mensaje; 41 u8 msg_payload[]; 42}; Entonces, esos bytes adicionales de payload se copian en msg_payload[], se ve una advertencia de tiempo de ejecución mientras se utiliza Syzkaller. Una forma posible de solucionar la advertencia es dividir memcpy() en dos partes: una, asignación directa del mensaje y la segunda, encargada del payload. Gustavo citó: "Bajo FORTIFY_SOURCE no debemos copiar datos entre varios miembros de una estructura".
CVSS Scores
SSVC
- Decision:Track
Timeline
- 2024-05-17 CVE Reserved
- 2024-05-19 CVE Published
- 2024-05-20 EPSS Updated
- 2024-11-05 CVE Updated
- ---------- Exploited in Wild
- ---------- KEV Due Date
- ---------- First Exploit
CWE
CAPEC
References (12)
URL | Tag | Source |
---|---|---|
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/msg00017.html | ||
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/msg00020.html |
URL | Date | SRC |
---|
URL | Date | SRC |
---|---|---|
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-35944 | 2024-11-12 | |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2281807 | 2024-11-12 |
Affected Vendors, Products, and Versions
Vendor | Product | Version | Other | Status | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vendor | Product | Version | Other | Status | <-- --> | Vendor | Product | Version | Other | Status |
Linux Search vendor "Linux" | Linux Kernel Search vendor "Linux" for product "Linux Kernel" | < 4.19.312 Search vendor "Linux" for product "Linux Kernel" and version " < 4.19.312" | en |
Affected
| ||||||
Linux Search vendor "Linux" | Linux Kernel Search vendor "Linux" for product "Linux Kernel" | < 5.4.274 Search vendor "Linux" for product "Linux Kernel" and version " < 5.4.274" | en |
Affected
| ||||||
Linux Search vendor "Linux" | Linux Kernel Search vendor "Linux" for product "Linux Kernel" | < 5.10.215 Search vendor "Linux" for product "Linux Kernel" and version " < 5.10.215" | en |
Affected
| ||||||
Linux Search vendor "Linux" | Linux Kernel Search vendor "Linux" for product "Linux Kernel" | < 5.15.155 Search vendor "Linux" for product "Linux Kernel" and version " < 5.15.155" | en |
Affected
| ||||||
Linux Search vendor "Linux" | Linux Kernel Search vendor "Linux" for product "Linux Kernel" | < 6.1.86 Search vendor "Linux" for product "Linux Kernel" and version " < 6.1.86" | en |
Affected
| ||||||
Linux Search vendor "Linux" | Linux Kernel Search vendor "Linux" for product "Linux Kernel" | < 6.6.27 Search vendor "Linux" for product "Linux Kernel" and version " < 6.6.27" | en |
Affected
| ||||||
Linux Search vendor "Linux" | Linux Kernel Search vendor "Linux" for product "Linux Kernel" | < 6.8.6 Search vendor "Linux" for product "Linux Kernel" and version " < 6.8.6" | en |
Affected
| ||||||
Linux Search vendor "Linux" | Linux Kernel Search vendor "Linux" for product "Linux Kernel" | < 6.9 Search vendor "Linux" for product "Linux Kernel" and version " < 6.9" | en |
Affected
|