Page 2 of 48 results (0.039 seconds)

CVSS: 6.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 1

09 Jun 2022 — x86 pv: Race condition in typeref acquisition Xen maintains a type reference count for pages, in addition to a regular reference count. This scheme is used to maintain invariants required for Xen's safety, e.g. PV guests may not have direct writeable access to pagetables; updates need auditing by Xen. Unfortunately, the logic for acquiring a type reference has a race condition, whereby a safely TLB flush is issued too early and creates a window where the guest can re-establish the read/write mapping before ... • https://packetstorm.news/files/id/167718 • CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') •

CVSS: 7.2EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 2

09 Jun 2022 — x86 pv: Insufficient care with non-coherent mappings T[his CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.] Xen maintains a type reference count for pages, in addition to a regular reference count. This scheme is used to maintain invariants required for Xen's safety, e.g. PV guests may not have direct writeable access to pagetables; updates need auditing by Xen. Unfortunately, Xen's safety logic doesn't account for CPU-induced cache n... • https://packetstorm.news/files/id/167710 •

CVSS: 7.2EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0

09 Jun 2022 — x86 pv: Insufficient care with non-coherent mappings T[his CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.] Xen maintains a type reference count for pages, in addition to a regular reference count. This scheme is used to maintain invariants required for Xen's safety, e.g. PV guests may not have direct writeable access to pagetables; updates need auditing by Xen. Unfortunately, Xen's safety logic doesn't account for CPU-induced cache n... • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/06/09/4 •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 1

18 May 2022 — The Zoom Client for Meetings (for Android, iOS, Linux, macOS, and Windows) before version 5.10.0 fails to properly validate the hostname during a server switch request. This issue could be used in a more sophisticated attack to trick an unsuspecting users client to connect to a malicious server when attempting to use Zoom services. Zoom Client for Meetings (para Android, iOS, Linux, macOS y Windows) anterior a la versión 5.10.0 no comprueba correctamente el nombre de host durante una petición de cambio de s... • https://packetstorm.news/files/id/167238 • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation •

CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0

18 May 2022 — The Zoom Client for Meetings for Windows before version 5.10.0 and Zoom Rooms for Conference Room for Windows before version 5.10.0, fails to properly check the installation version during the update process. This issue could be used in a more sophisticated attack to trick a user into downgrading their Zoom client to a less secure version. Zoom Client for Meetings para Windows versiones anteriores a 5.10.0 y Zoom Rooms for Conference Room para Windows versiones anteriores a 5.10.0, no comprueban apropiadame... • https://explore.zoom.us/en/trust/security/security-bulletin • CWE-494: Download of Code Without Integrity Check •

CVSS: 9.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0

18 May 2022 — The Zoom Client for Meetings (for Android, iOS, Linux, MacOS, and Windows) before version 5.10.0 failed to properly constrain client session cookies to Zoom domains. This issue could be used in a more sophisticated attack to send an unsuspecting users Zoom-scoped session cookies to a non-Zoom domain. This could potentially allow for spoofing of a Zoom user. Zoom Client for Meetings (para Android, iOS, Linux, MacOS y Windows) versiones anteriores a 5.10.0, no restringe apropiadamente las cookies de sesión de... • https://explore.zoom.us/en/trust/security/security-bulletin • CWE-565: Reliance on Cookies without Validation and Integrity Checking •

CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0

18 May 2022 — The Zoom Client for Meetings (for Android, iOS, Linux, MacOS, and Windows) before version 5.10.0 failed to properly parse XML stanzas in XMPP messages. This can allow a malicious user to break out of the current XMPP message context and create a new message context to have the receiving users client perform a variety of actions.This issue could be used in a more sophisticated attack to forge XMPP messages from the server. Zoom Client for Meetings (para Android, iOS, Linux, MacOS y Windows) versiones anterio... • https://explore.zoom.us/en/trust/security/security-bulletin • CWE-91: XML Injection (aka Blind XPath Injection) •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 50EXPL: 1

24 Nov 2021 — A vulnerability was discovered in the Zoom Client for Meetings (for Android, iOS, Linux, macOS, and Windows) before version 5.8.4, Zoom Client for Meetings for Blackberry (for Android and iOS) before version 5.8.1, Zoom Client for Meetings for intune (for Android and iOS) before version 5.8.4, Zoom Client for Meetings for Chrome OS before version 5.0.1, Zoom Rooms for Conference Room (for Android, AndroidBali, macOS, and Windows) before version 5.8.3, Controllers for Zoom Rooms (for Android, iOS, and Window... • https://packetstorm.news/files/id/165419 • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 51EXPL: 1

24 Nov 2021 — A buffer overflow vulnerability was discovered in Zoom Client for Meetings (for Android, iOS, Linux, macOS, and Windows) before version 5.8.4, Zoom Client for Meetings for Blackberry (for Android and iOS) before version 5.8.1, Zoom Client for Meetings for intune (for Android and iOS) before version 5.8.4, Zoom Client for Meetings for Chrome OS before version 5.0.1, Zoom Rooms for Conference Room (for Android, AndroidBali, macOS, and Windows) before version 5.8.3, Controllers for Zoom Rooms (for Android, iOS... • https://packetstorm.news/files/id/165417 • CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') •

CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

11 Jun 2021 — x86: Speculative vulnerabilities with bare (non-shim) 32-bit PV guests 32-bit x86 PV guest kernels run in ring 1. At the time when Xen was developed, this area of the i386 architecture was rarely used, which is why Xen was able to use it to implement paravirtualisation, Xen's novel approach to virtualization. In AMD64, Xen had to use a different implementation approach, so Xen does not use ring 1 to support 64-bit guests. With the focus now being on 64-bit systems, and the availability of explicit hardware ... • https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-370.txt • CWE-212: Improper Removal of Sensitive Information Before Storage or Transfer •