CVSS: 6.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2024-32638 – Apache APISIX: Forward-Auth Request Smuggling
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-32638
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request Smuggling') vulnerability in Apache APISIX when using `forward-auth` plugin.This issue affects Apache APISIX: from 3.8.0, 3.9.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.8.1, 3.9.1 or higher, which fixes the issue. Vulnerabilidad de interpretación inconsistente de solicitudes HTTP ("contrabando de solicitudes HTTP") en Apache APISIX cuando se utiliza el complemento `forward-auth`. Este problema afecta a Apache APISIX: desde 3.8.0, 3.9.0. Se recomienda a los usuarios actualizar a la versión 3.8.1, 3.9.1 o superior, lo que soluciona el problema. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/05/02/2 https://lists.apache.org/thread/ngvgxllw4zn4hgngkqw2o225kf9wotov • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 81%CPEs: 444EXPL: 7CVE-2023-44487 – HTTP/2 Rapid Reset Attack Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-44487
The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023. El protocolo HTTP/2 permite una denegación de servicio (consumo de recursos del servidor) porque la cancelación de solicitudes puede restablecer muchas transmisiones rápidamente, como se explotó en la naturaleza entre agosto y octubre de 2023. A flaw was found in handling multiplexed streams in the HTTP/2 protocol. A client can repeatedly make a request for a new multiplex stream and immediately send an RST_STREAM frame to cancel it. This creates extra work for the server setting up and tearing down the streams while not hitting any server-side limit for the maximum number of active streams per connection, resulting in a denial of service due to server resource consumption. • https://github.com/imabee101/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/studiogangster/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/bcdannyboy/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/sigridou/CVE-2023-44487- https://github.com/ByteHackr/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/ReToCode/golang-CVE-2023-44487 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/13/4 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/13/9 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/18/4 http://www. • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2022-29266 – apisix/jwt-auth may leak secrets in error response
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-29266
In APache APISIX before 3.13.1, the jwt-auth plugin has a security issue that leaks the user's secret key because the error message returned from the dependency lua-resty-jwt contains sensitive information. En APache APISIX antes de la versión 3.13.1, el plugin jwt-auth tiene un problema de seguridad que filtra la clave secreta del usuario porque el mensaje de error devuelto por la dependencia lua-resty-jwt contiene información sensible • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/04/20/1 https://lists.apache.org/thread/6qpfyxogbvn18g9xr8g218jjfjbfsbhr • CWE-209: Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2022-25757 – Apache APISIX: the body_schema check in request-validation plugin can be bypassed
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-25757
In Apache APISIX before 2.13.0, when decoding JSON with duplicate keys, lua-cjson will choose the last occurred value as the result. By passing a JSON with a duplicate key, the attacker can bypass the body_schema validation in the request-validation plugin. For example, `{"string_payload":"bad","string_payload":"good"}` can be used to hide the "bad" input. Systems satisfy three conditions below are affected by this attack: 1. use body_schema validation in the request-validation plugin 2. upstream application uses a special JSON library that chooses the first occurred value, like jsoniter or gojay 3. upstream application does not validate the input anymore. The fix in APISIX is to re-encode the validated JSON input back into the request body at the side of APISIX. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/03/28/2 https://lists.apache.org/thread/03vd2j81krxmpz6xo8p1dl642flpo6fv • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 97%CPEs: 2EXPL: 11CVE-2022-24112 – Apache APISIX Authentication Bypass Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-24112
An attacker can abuse the batch-requests plugin to send requests to bypass the IP restriction of Admin API. A default configuration of Apache APISIX (with default API key) is vulnerable to remote code execution. When the admin key was changed or the port of Admin API was changed to a port different from the data panel, the impact is lower. But there is still a risk to bypass the IP restriction of Apache APISIX's data panel. There is a check in the batch-requests plugin which overrides the client IP with its real remote IP. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/50829 https://github.com/Mr-xn/CVE-2022-24112 https://github.com/M4xSec/Apache-APISIX-CVE-2022-24112 https://github.com/Axx8/CVE-2022-24112 https://github.com/Mah1ndra/CVE-2022-24112 https://github.com/CrackerCat/CVE-2022-24112 https://github.com/wshepherd0010/CVE-2022-24112-Lab https://github.com/kavishkagihan/CVE-2022-24112-POC http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/166228/Apache-APISIX-Remote-Code-Execution.html http://packetstormsecurity.com&# • CWE-290: Authentication Bypass by Spoofing •