CVSS: 7.2EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2023-51441 – Apache Axis 1.x (EOL) may allow SSRF when untrusted input is passed to the service admin HTTP API
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-51441
Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Axis allowed users with access to the admin service to perform possible SSRF This issue affects Apache Axis: through 1.3. As Axis 1 has been EOL we recommend you migrate to a different SOAP engine, such as Apache Axis 2/Java. Alternatively you could use a build of Axis with the patch from https://github.com/apache/axis-axis1-java/commit/685c309febc64aa393b2d64a05f90e7eb9f73e06 applied. The Apache Axis project does not expect to create an Axis 1.x release fixing this problem, though contributors that would like to work towards this are welcome. La vulnerabilidad de validación de entrada incorrecta en Apache Axis permitió a los usuarios con acceso al servicio de administración realizar posibles SSRF. Este problema afecta a Apache Axis: hasta 1.3. • https://github.com/apache/axis-axis1-java/commit/685c309febc64aa393b2d64a05f90e7eb9f73e06 https://lists.apache.org/thread/8nrm5thop8f82pglx4o0jg8wmvy6d9yd • CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2023-40743 – Apache Axis 1.x (EOL) may allow RCE when untrusted input is passed to getService
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-40743
When integrating Apache Axis 1.x in an application, it may not have been obvious that looking up a service through "ServiceFactory.getService" allows potentially dangerous lookup mechanisms such as LDAP. When passing untrusted input to this API method, this could expose the application to DoS, SSRF and even attacks leading to RCE. As Axis 1 has been EOL we recommend you migrate to a different SOAP engine, such as Apache Axis 2/Java. As a workaround, you may review your code to verify no untrusted or unsanitized input is passed to "ServiceFactory.getService", or by applying the patch from https://github.com/apache/axis-axis1-java/commit/7e66753427466590d6def0125e448d2791723210 . The Apache Axis project does not expect to create an Axis 1.x release fixing this problem, though contributors that would like to work towards this are welcome. Al integrar Apache Axis 1.x en una aplicación, puede que no haya sido obvio que buscar un servicio a través de "ServiceFactory.getService" permita mecanismos de búsqueda potencialmente peligrosos como LDAP . • https://github.com/apache/axis-axis1-java/commit/7e66753427466590d6def0125e448d2791723210 https://lists.apache.org/thread/gs0qgk2mgss7zfhzdd6ftfjvm4kp7v82 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/10/msg00025.html • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-75: Failure to Sanitize Special Elements into a Different Plane (Special Element Injection) •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 86%CPEs: 77EXPL: 2CVE-2019-0227 – Apache Axis 1.4 - Remote Code Execution
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-0227
A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability affected the Apache Axis 1.4 distribution that was last released in 2006. Security and bug commits commits continue in the projects Axis 1.x Subversion repository, legacy users are encouraged to build from source. The successor to Axis 1.x is Axis2, the latest version is 1.7.9 and is not vulnerable to this issue. Una vulnerabilidad de tipo SSRF (Server Side Request Forgery) afectó a la distribución de Apache Axis 1.4 que fue lanzada por última vez en 2006. La seguridad y las confirmaciones de errores continúan en el repositorio de Subversion de Axis 1.x, se anima a los usuarios a construir desde el código fuente. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/46682 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r3a5baf5d76f1f2181be7f54da3deab70d7a38b5660b387583d05a8cd%40%3Cjava-user.axis.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r6d03e45b81eab03580cf7f8bb51cb3e9a1b10a2cc0c6a2d3cc92ed0c%40%3Cannounce.apache.org%3E https://rhinosecuritylabs.com/application-security/cve-2019-0227-expired-domain-rce-apache-axis https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0006 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpua • CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) •
CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 76EXPL: 1CVE-2018-8032
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-8032
Apache Axis 1.x up to and including 1.4 is vulnerable to a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack in the default servlet/services. Apache Axis en versiones 1.x hasta la 1.4 (incluida) es vulnerable a un ataque de Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) en el servlet/services por defecto. • https://github.com/cairuojin/CVE-2018-8032 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/axis-java-dev/201807.mbox/%3CJIRA.13170716.1531060536000.93536.1531060560060%40Atlassian.JIRA%3E https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-2924 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/3b89bc9e9d055db7eba8835ff6501f3f5db99d2a0928ec0be9b1d17b%40%3Cjava-dev.axis.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d06ed5e4eeb77d00e8d594ec01ee8ee1cba173a01ac4b18f1579d041%40%3Cjava-dev.axis.apache.org%3E https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/11& • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •
CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 19EXPL: 0CVE-2014-3596 – axis: SSL hostname verification bypass, incomplete CVE-2012-5784 fix
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-3596
The getCN function in Apache Axis 1.4 and earlier does not properly verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via a certificate with a subject that specifies a common name in a field that is not the CN field. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2012-5784. La función getCN en Apache Axis 1.4 y versiones anteriores no verifica correctamente que el nombre de host del servidor coincida con un nombre de dominio en el campo Common Name (CN) o subjectAltName del certificado X.509, lo que permite a los atacantes intermedios falsificar servidores SSL mediante un certificado con un asunto que especifica un nombre común en un campo que no es el campo CN. NOTA: este problema existe debido a una solución incompleta para CVE-2012-5784. It was discovered that Axis incorrectly extracted the host name from an X.509 certificate subject's Common Name (CN) field. • http://linux.oracle.com/errata/ELSA-2014-1193.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00007.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00022.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1193.html http://secunia.com/advisories/61222 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/08/20/2 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/69295 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1030745 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/95377 http • CWE-297: Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch •