
CVE-2004-0079
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2004-0079
18 Mar 2004 — The do_change_cipher_spec function in OpenSSL 0.9.6c to 0.9.6k, and 0.9.7a to 0.9.7c, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted SSL/TLS handshake that triggers a null dereference. La función do_change_cipher_spec en OpenSSL 0.9.6c hasta 0.9.6.k y 0.9.7a hasta 0.9.7c permite que atacantes remotos provoquen una denegación de servicio (caída) mediante una hábil unión SSL/TLS que provoca un puntero nulo. • ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-04:05.openssl.asc • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •

CVE-2004-0081
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2004-0081
18 Mar 2004 — OpenSSL 0.9.6 before 0.9.6d does not properly handle unknown message types, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop), as demonstrated using the Codenomicon TLS Test Tool. OpenSSL 0.9.6 anteriores a la 0.9.6d no manejan adecuadamente los tipos de mensajes desconocidos, lo que permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicios (por bucle infinito), como se demuestra utilizando la herramienta de testeo Codenomicon TLS. • ftp://ftp.sco.com/pub/updates/OpenServer/SCOSA-2004.10/SCOSA-2004.10.txt •

CVE-2004-0112
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2004-0112
18 Mar 2004 — The SSL/TLS handshaking code in OpenSSL 0.9.7a, 0.9.7b, and 0.9.7c, when using Kerberos ciphersuites, does not properly check the length of Kerberos tickets during a handshake, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted SSL/TLS handshake that causes an out-of-bounds read. El código que une SSL/TLS en OpenSSL 0.9.7a, 0.9.7b y 0.9.7c, usando Kerberos, no comprueba adecuadamente la longitud de los tickets de Kerberos, lo que permite que atacantes remotos provoquen una dene... • ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2004-005.txt.asc • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read •

CVE-2002-1623
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2002-1623
31 Dec 2002 — The design of the Internet Key Exchange (IKE) protocol, when using Aggressive Mode for shared secret authentication, does not encrypt initiator or responder identities during negotiation, which may allow remote attackers to determine valid usernames by (1) monitoring responses before the password is supplied or (2) sniffing, as originally reported for FireWall-1 SecuRemote. • http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2002-September/001223.html •

CVE-2002-0428
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2002-0428
11 Jun 2002 — Check Point FireWall-1 SecuRemote/SecuClient 4.0 and 4.1 allows clients to bypass the "authentication timeout" by modifying the to_expire or expire values in the client's users.C configuration file. • http://online.securityfocus.com/archive/1/260662 •