10 results (0.022 seconds)

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 97%CPEs: 97EXPL: 24

A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it. Una aplicación Spring MVC o Spring WebFlux que es ejecutada en JDK 9+ puede ser vulnerable a la ejecución de código remota (RCE) por medio de una vinculación de datos. • https://github.com/0zvxr/CVE-2022-22965 https://github.com/alt3kx/CVE-2022-22965 https://github.com/zangcc/CVE-2022-22965-rexbb https://github.com/Kirill89/CVE-2022-22965-PoC https://github.com/tangxiaofeng7/CVE-2022-22965-Spring-Core-Rce https://github.com/p1ckzi/CVE-2022-22965 https://github.com/me2nuk/CVE-2022-22965 https://github.com/light-Life/CVE-2022-22965-GUItools https://github.com/viniciuspereiras/CVE-2022-22965-poc https://github.com/itsecurityco/CVE-2022-2 • CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') •

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 96%CPEs: 398EXPL: 30

Apache Log4j2 2.0-beta9 through 2.15.0 (excluding security releases 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1) JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints. An attacker who can control log messages or log message parameters can execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers when message lookup substitution is enabled. From log4j 2.15.0, this behavior has been disabled by default. From version 2.16.0 (along with 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1), this functionality has been completely removed. Note that this vulnerability is specific to log4j-core and does not affect log4net, log4cxx, or other Apache Logging Services projects. • https://github.com/fullhunt/log4j-scan https://github.com/Puliczek/CVE-2021-44228-PoC-log4j-bypass-words https://github.com/cyberstruggle/L4sh https://github.com/woodpecker-appstore/log4j-payload-generator https://github.com/tangxiaofeng7/apache-log4j-poc https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/51183 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/50592 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/50590 https://github.com/logpresso/CVE-2021-44228-Scanner https://github.com/jas502n/Log4j2-CVE-2021-44228 h • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data CWE-917: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an Expression Language Statement ('Expression Language Injection') •

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 18%CPEs: 18EXPL: 0

Buffer overflow in a certain driver in Cisco Security Agent 4.5.1 before 4.5.1.672, 5.0 before 5.0.0.225, 5.1 before 5.1.0.106, and 5.2 before 5.2.0.238 on Windows allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted SMB packet in a TCP session on port (1) 139 or (2) 445. Un desbordamiento de búfer en un determinado controlador en Cisco Security Agent versiones 4.5.1 anteriores a 4.5.1.672, versiones 5.0 anteriores a 5.0.0.225, versiones 5.1 anteriores a 5.1.0.106, y versiones 5.2 anteriores a 5.2.0.238 en Windows, permite a los atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario por medio de un paquete SMB especialmente diseñado en una sesión TCP en el puerto (1) 139 o (2) 445. • http://osvdb.org/39521 http://secunia.com/advisories/27947 http://securityreason.com/securityalert/3425 http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCsl00618 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a008090a434.shtml http://www.nsfocus.com/english/homepage/research/0702.htm http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/484669/100/100/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/26723 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1019046 http:&# • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •

CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 10EXPL: 0

Cisco Secure Services Client (CSSC) 4.x, Trust Agent 1.x and 2.x, Cisco Security Agent (CSA) 5.0 and 5.1 (when a vulnerable Trust Agent has been deployed), and the Meetinghouse AEGIS SecureConnect Client allows local users to gain SYSTEM privileges via unspecified vectors in the supplicant, aka CSCsf15836. Cisco Secure Services Client (CSSC) versiones 4.x, Trust Agent versiones 1.x y 2.x, Cisco Security Agent (CSA) versiones 5.0 y 5.1 (cuando ha sido desplegado un agente de confianza vulnerable), y el Meetinghouse AEGIS SecureConnect Client, permiten a usuarios locales alcanzar privilegios SYSTEM por medio de vectores no especificados en el requiriente, también se conoce como CSCsf15836. • http://osvdb.org/33048 http://secunia.com/advisories/24258 http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20070221-supplicant.shtml http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/22648 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1017683 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1017684 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/0690 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/32622 •

CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 10EXPL: 0

Cisco Secure Services Client (CSSC) 4.x, Trust Agent 1.x and 2.x, Cisco Security Agent (CSA) 5.0 and 5.1 (when a vulnerable Trust Agent has been deployed), and the Meetinghouse AEGIS SecureConnect Client do not drop privileges when the help facility in the supplicant GUI is invoked, which allows local users to gain privileges, aka CSCsf14120. Cisco Secure Services Client (CSSC) versiones 4.x, Trust Agent 1.x y 2.x, Cisco Security Agent (CSA) versiones 5.0 y 5.1 (cuando ha sido desplegado un Trust Agent vulnerable) y el Meetinghouse AEGIS SecureConnect Client, no pierde los privilegios cuando es invocado el servicio de ayuda en la GUI del requirente, lo que permite a usuarios locales alcanzar privilegios, también se conoce como CSCsf14120. • http://osvdb.org/33049 http://secunia.com/advisories/24258 http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20070221-supplicant.shtml http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/22648 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1017683 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1017684 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/0690 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/32621 •