23 results (0.011 seconds)

CVSS: 6.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0

An issue has been identified in both XenServer 8 and Citrix Hypervisor 8.2 CU1 LTSR which may allow a malicious administrator of a guest VM to cause the host to become slow and/or unresponsive. Se ha identificado un problema tanto en XenServer 8 como en Citrix Hypervisor 8.2 CU1 LTSR que puede permitir que un administrador malintencionado de una máquina virtual invitada haga que el host se vuelva lento o no responda. • https://support.citrix.com/article/CTX677100/xenserver-and-citrix-hypervisor-security-update-for-cve20245661 •

CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0

The Windows Guest Tools in Citrix XenServer 6.2 SP1 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (guest OS crash) via a crafted Ethernet frame. Las Herramientas para Invitados de Windows en Citrix XenServer versión 6.2 SP1 y anteriores, permiten a los atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (fallo del Sistema Operativo invitado) por medio de una trama de Ethernet especialmente diseñada. • http://secunia.com/advisories/58455 http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX140814 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/67693 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1030304 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •

CVSS: 5.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 481EXPL: 0

System software utilizing Lazy FP state restore technique on systems using Intel Core-based microprocessors may potentially allow a local process to infer data from another process through a speculative execution side channel. El software de sistema que emplea la técnica de restauración de estado Lazy FP en los sistemas que emplean microprocesadores de Intel Core podrían permitir que un proceso local infiera datos de otro proceso mediante un canal lateral de ejecución especulativa. A Floating Point Unit (FPU) state information leakage flaw was found in the way the Linux kernel saved and restored the FPU state during task switch. Linux kernels that follow the "Lazy FPU Restore" scheme are vulnerable to the FPU state information leakage issue. An unprivileged local attacker could use this flaw to read FPU state bits by conducting targeted cache side-channel attacks, similar to the Meltdown vulnerability disclosed earlier this year. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104460 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041124 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041125 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1852 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1944 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2164 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2165 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1170 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1190 https://help.ecostruxureit.com/display/public/UADCE725/Security+fixes& • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 24EXPL: 4

A statement in the System Programming Guide of the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual (SDM) was mishandled in the development of some or all operating-system kernels, resulting in unexpected behavior for #DB exceptions that are deferred by MOV SS or POP SS, as demonstrated by (for example) privilege escalation in Windows, macOS, some Xen configurations, or FreeBSD, or a Linux kernel crash. The MOV to SS and POP SS instructions inhibit interrupts (including NMIs), data breakpoints, and single step trap exceptions until the instruction boundary following the next instruction (SDM Vol. 3A; section 6.8.3). (The inhibited data breakpoints are those on memory accessed by the MOV to SS or POP to SS instruction itself.) Note that debug exceptions are not inhibited by the interrupt enable (EFLAGS.IF) system flag (SDM Vol. 3A; section 2.3). If the instruction following the MOV to SS or POP to SS instruction is an instruction like SYSCALL, SYSENTER, INT 3, etc. that transfers control to the operating system at CPL < 3, the debug exception is delivered after the transfer to CPL < 3 is complete. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44697 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/45024 https://github.com/can1357/CVE-2018-8897 https://github.com/nmulasmajic/CVE-2018-8897 http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=d8ba61ba58c88d5207c1ba2f7d9a2280e7d03be9 http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2018/05/08/1 http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2018/05/08/4 http://www.huawei.com/en/psirt/security-advisories/huawei-sa-20190921-01-debug-en http: • CWE-250: Execution with Unnecessary Privileges CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') •

CVSS: 9.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 24EXPL: 0

A heap buffer overflow flaw was found in QEMU's Cirrus CLGD 54xx VGA emulator's VNC display driver support before 2.9; the issue could occur when a VNC client attempted to update its display after a VGA operation is performed by a guest. A privileged user/process inside a guest could use this flaw to crash the QEMU process or, potentially, execute arbitrary code on the host with privileges of the QEMU process. Se ha detectado una vulnerabilidad de desbordamiento de búfer basado en memoria dinámica (heap) en el soporte del controlador de pantalla VNC del emulador Cirrus CLGD 54xx VGA de QEMU en versiones anteriores a la 2.9. El problema podía ocurrir cuando un cliente VNC intentaba actualizar su pantalla después de que un invitado realizara una operación VGA. Un usuario/proceso privilegiado dentro de un guest podría usar esta vulnerabilidad para provocar que el proceso de QEMU se cierre inesperadamente o, potencialmente, ejecutar código arbitrario en el host con privilegios del proceso de QEMU. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96893 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038023 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0980 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0981 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0982 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0983 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0984 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0985 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0987 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0988 https:& • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow •