16 results (0.011 seconds)

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 83%CPEs: 444EXPL: 7

CVE-2023-44487 – HTTP/2 Rapid Reset Attack Vulnerability

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-44487

The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023. El protocolo HTTP/2 permite una denegación de servicio (consumo de recursos del servidor) porque la cancelación de solicitudes puede restablecer muchas transmisiones rápidamente, como se explotó en la naturaleza entre agosto y octubre de 2023. A flaw was found in handling multiplexed streams in the HTTP/2 protocol. A client can repeatedly make a request for a new multiplex stream and immediately send an RST_STREAM frame to cancel it. This creates extra work for the server setting up and tearing down the streams while not hitting any server-side limit for the maximum number of active streams per connection, resulting in a denial of service due to server resource consumption. • https://github.com/imabee101/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/studiogangster/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/bcdannyboy/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/sigridou/CVE-2023-44487- https://github.com/ByteHackr/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/ReToCode/golang-CVE-2023-44487 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/13/4 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/13/9 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/18/4 http://www. • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 4%CPEs: 44EXPL: 0

CVE-2019-9515 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9515

Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a una inundación de configuraciones, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00032.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Aug/16 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2766 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2796 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2861 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2925 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2939 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2955 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 82%CPEs: 55EXPL: 0

CVE-2019-9514 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9514

Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a una inundación de reinicio, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. El atacante abre una serie de secuencias y envía una solicitud no válida sobre cada secuencia que debería solicitar una secuencia de tramas RST_STREAM del par. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00076.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00002.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00011.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00021.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •

CVSS: 4.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 176EXPL: 0

CVE-2014-6031

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-6031

Buffer overflow in the mcpq daemon in F5 BIG-IP systems 10.x before 10.2.4 HF12, 11.x before 11.2.1 HF15, 11.3.x, 11.4.x before 11.4.1 HF9, 11.5.x before 11.5.2 HF1, and 11.6.0 before HF4, and Enterprise Manager 2.1.0 through 2.3.0 and 3.x before 3.1.1 HF5 allows remote authenticated administrators to cause a denial of service via unspecified vectors. Desbordamiento de buffer en el demonio mcpq en sistemas F5 BIG-IP, versiones 10.x anteriores a la 10.2.4 HF12, 11.x anteriores a la 11.2.1 HF15, 11.3.x, 11.4.x anteriores a la 11.4.1 HF9, 11.5.x anteriores a la 11.5.2 HF1 y 11.6.0 anteriores a la HF4 y Enterprise Manager, versiones de la 2.1.0 a la 2.3.0 y 3.x anteriores a la 3.1.1 HF5, que permitiría a administradores autenticados causar una denegación de servicio a través de vectores no especificados. • https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K16196 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 120EXPL: 0

CVE-2015-8099

https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-8099

F5 BIG-IP LTM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, Link Controller, and PEM 11.3.x, 11.4.x before 11.4.1 HF10, 11.5.x before 11.5.4, 11.6.x before 11.6.1, and 12.x before 12.0.0 HF1; BIG-IP AAM 11.4.x before 11.4.1 HF10, 11.5.x before 11.5.4, 11.6.x before 11.6.1, and 12.x before 12.0.0 HF1; BIG-IP DNS 12.x before 12.0.0 HF1; BIG-IP Edge Gateway, WebAccelerator, and WOM 11.3.0; BIG-IP GTM 11.3.x, 11.4.x before 11.4.1 HF10, 11.5.x before 11.5.4, and 11.6.x before 11.6.1; BIG-IP PSM 11.3.x and 11.4.x before 11.4.1 HF10; Enterprise Manager 3.0.0 through 3.1.1; BIG-IQ Cloud and BIG-IQ Security 4.0.0 through 4.5.0; BIG-IQ Device 4.2.0 through 4.5.0; BIG-IQ ADC 4.5.0; BIG-IQ Centralized Management 4.6.0; and BIG-IQ Cloud and Orchestration 1.0.0 on the 3900, 6900, 8900, 8950, 11000, 11050, PB100 and PB200 platforms, when software SYN cookies are configured on virtual servers, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (High-Speed Bridge hang) via an invalid TCP segment. F5 BIG-IP LTM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, Link Controller y PEM 11.3.x, 11.4.x en versiones anteriores a 11.4.1 HF10, 11.5.x en versiones anteriores a 11.5.4, 11.6.x en versiones anteriores a 11.6.1 y 12.x en versiones anteriores a 12.0.0 HF1; BIG-IP AAM 11.4.x en versiones anteriores a 11.4.1 HF10, 11.5.x en versiones anteriores a 11.5.4, 11.6.x en versiones anteriores a 11.6.1 y 12.x en versiones anteriores a 12.0.0 HF1; BIG-IP DNS 12.x en versiones anteriores a 12.0.0 HF1; BIG-IP Edge Gateway, WebAccelerator y WOM 11.3.0; BIG-IP GTM 11.3.x, 11.4.x en versiones anteriores a 11.4.1 HF10, 11.5.x en versiones anteriores a 11.5.4 y 11.6.x en versiones anteriores a 11.6.1; BIG-IP PSM 11.3.x y 11.4.x en versiones anteriores a 11.4.1 HF10; Enterprise Manager 3.0.0 hasta la versión 3.1.1; BIG-IQ Cloud and BIG-IQ Security 4.0.0 hasta la versión 4.5.0; BIG-IQ Device 4.2.0 hasta la versión 4.5.0; BIG-IQ ADC 4.5.0; BIG-IQ Centralized Management 4.6.0; y BIG-IQ Cloud and Orchestration 1.0.0 en las plataformas 3900, 6900, 8900, 8950, 11000, 11050, PB100 y PB200, cuando las cookies del sofware SYN están configuradas en servidores virtuales, permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (cuelgue de High-Speed Bridge) a través de un segmento TCP no válido. • http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1035873 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1035874 https://support.f5.com/kb/en-us/solutions/public/k/35/sol35358312.html • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •