67 results (0.003 seconds)

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 83%CPEs: 444EXPL: 7

The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023. El protocolo HTTP/2 permite una denegación de servicio (consumo de recursos del servidor) porque la cancelación de solicitudes puede restablecer muchas transmisiones rápidamente, como se explotó en la naturaleza entre agosto y octubre de 2023. A flaw was found in handling multiplexed streams in the HTTP/2 protocol. A client can repeatedly make a request for a new multiplex stream and immediately send an RST_STREAM frame to cancel it. This creates extra work for the server setting up and tearing down the streams while not hitting any server-side limit for the maximum number of active streams per connection, resulting in a denial of service due to server resource consumption. • https://github.com/imabee101/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/studiogangster/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/bcdannyboy/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/sigridou/CVE-2023-44487- https://github.com/ByteHackr/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/ReToCode/golang-CVE-2023-44487 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/13/4 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/13/9 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/18/4 http://www. • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 60EXPL: 1

The Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Protocol allows remote attackers (from the client side) to send arbitrary numbers that are actually not public keys, and trigger expensive server-side DHE modular-exponentiation calculations, aka a D(HE)at or D(HE)ater attack. The client needs very little CPU resources and network bandwidth. The attack may be more disruptive in cases where a client can require a server to select its largest supported key size. The basic attack scenario is that the client must claim that it can only communicate with DHE, and the server must be configured to allow DHE. El Protocolo de Acuerdo de Claves Diffie-Hellman permite a atacantes remotos (del lado del cliente) enviar números arbitrarios que en realidad no son claves públicas, y desencadenar costosos cálculos de exponenciación modular DHE del lado del servidor, también se conoce como un ataque D(HE)ater. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-506569.pdf https://dheatattack.com https://dheatattack.gitlab.io https://github.com/Balasys/dheater https://github.com/mozilla/ssl-config-generator/issues/162 https://gitlab.com/dheatattack/dheater https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10374117 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K83120834 https://www.arubanetworks.com/assets/alert/ARUBA-PSA-2022-004.txt https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2022/10/21/tls-groups-configuration https: • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •

CVSS: 9.0EPSS: 96%CPEs: 26EXPL: 8

A crafted request uri-path can cause mod_proxy to forward the request to an origin server choosen by the remote user. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 and earlier. Un uri-path diseñado puede causar que mod_proxy reenvíe la petición a un servidor de origen elegido por el usuario remoto. Este problema afecta a Apache HTTP Server versiones 2.4.48 y anteriores A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) flaw was found in mod_proxy of httpd. This flaw allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to make the httpd server forward requests to an arbitrary server. • https://github.com/sixpacksecurity/CVE-2021-40438 https://github.com/xiaojiangxl/CVE-2021-40438 https://github.com/Kashkovsky/CVE-2021-40438 https://github.com/sergiovks/CVE-2021-40438-Apache-2.4.48-SSRF-exploit https://github.com/BabyTeam1024/CVE-2021-40438 https://github.com/gassara-kys/CVE-2021-40438 https://github.com/Cappricio-Securities/CVE-2021-40438 https://github.com/pisut4152/Sigma-Rule-for-CVE-2021-40438-exploitation-attempt https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ • CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) •

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 84EXPL: 0

On BIG-IP 15.0.0-15.0.1.1, 14.1.0-14.1.2.2, 14.0.0-14.0.1, 13.1.0-13.1.3.1, 12.1.0-12.1.5, and 11.6.0-11.6.5.1, the tmm crashes under certain circumstances when using the connector profile if a specific sequence of connections are made. En BIG-IP versiones 15.0.0-15.0.1.1, 14.1.0-14.1.2.2, 14.0.0-14.0.1, 13.1.0-13.1.3.1, 12.1.0-12.1.5 y 11.6.0-11.6.5.1, el tmm se bloquea en determinadas circunstancias cuando se usa el perfil connector si una secuencia específica de conexiones es realizada. • https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K50046200 •

CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 77EXPL: 0

An Information Disclosure vulnerability exists in NTP 4.2.7p25 private (mode 6/7) messages via a GET_RESTRICT control message, which could let a malicious user obtain sensitive information. Existe una vulnerabilidad de Divulgación de Información en los mensajes privados (modo 6/7) de NTP versión 4.2.7p25 por medio de un mensaje de control GET_RESTRICT, que podría permitir a un usuario malicioso obtener información confidencial. • https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/95841 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K44942017 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K44942017?utm_source=f5support&amp%3Butm_medium=RSS • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •