CVE-2024-22192 – Ursa CL-Signatures Revocation allows verifiers to generate unique identifiers for holders
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-22192
Ursa is a cryptographic library for use with blockchains. The revocation scheme that is part of the Ursa CL-Signatures implementations has a flaw that could impact the privacy guarantees defined by the AnonCreds verifiable credential model. Notably, a malicious verifier may be able to generate a unique identifier for a holder providing a verifiable presentation that includes a Non-Revocation proof. The impact of the flaw is that a malicious verifier may be able to determine a unique identifier for a holder presenting a Non-Revocation proof. Ursa has moved to end-of-life status and no fix is expected. • https://github.com/hyperledger-archives/ursa/security/advisories/GHSA-6698-mhxx-r84g • CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •
CVE-2024-21670 – CL-Signatures Revocation Scheme in Ursa has flaws that allow a holder to demonstrate non-revocation of a revoked credential
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-21670
Ursa is a cryptographic library for use with blockchains. The revocation schema that is part of the Ursa CL-Signatures implementations has a flaw that could impact the privacy guarantees defined by the AnonCreds verifiable credential model, allowing a malicious holder of a revoked credential to generate a valid Non-Revocation Proof for that credential as part of an AnonCreds presentation. A verifier may verify a credential from a holder as being "not revoked" when in fact, the holder's credential has been revoked. Ursa has moved to end-of-life status and no fix is expected. Ursa es una librería criptográfica para usar con blockchains. • https://github.com/hyperledger-archives/ursa/security/advisories/GHSA-r78f-4q2q-hvv4 • CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •
CVE-2022-31021 – Unlinkability broken in ursa when verifiers use malicious keys
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-31021
Ursa is a cryptographic library for use with blockchains. A weakness in the Hyperledger AnonCreds specification that is not mitigated in the Ursa and AnonCreds implementations is that the Issuer does not publish a key correctness proof demonstrating that a generated private key is sufficient to meet the unlinkability guarantees of AnonCreds. The Ursa and AnonCreds CL-Signatures implementations always generate a sufficient private key. A malicious issuer could in theory create a custom CL Signature implementation (derived from the Ursa or AnonCreds CL-Signatures implementations) that uses weakened private keys such that presentations from holders could be shared by verifiers to the issuer who could determine the holder to which the credential was issued. This vulnerability could impact holders of AnonCreds credentials implemented using the CL-signature scheme in the Ursa and AnonCreds implementations of CL Signatures. • https://github.com/hyperledger/ursa/security/advisories/GHSA-2q6j-gqc4-4gw3 https://www.brics.dk/RS/98/29/BRICS-RS-98-29.pdf • CWE-829: Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere •