6 results (0.017 seconds)

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0

NSS (Network Security Services) versions prior to 3.73 or 3.68.1 ESR are vulnerable to a heap overflow when handling DER-encoded DSA or RSA-PSS signatures. Applications using NSS for handling signatures encoded within CMS, S/MIME, PKCS \#7, or PKCS \#12 are likely to be impacted. Applications using NSS for certificate validation or other TLS, X.509, OCSP or CRL functionality may be impacted, depending on how they configure NSS. *Note: This vulnerability does NOT impact Mozilla Firefox.* However, email clients and PDF viewers that use NSS for signature verification, such as Thunderbird, LibreOffice, Evolution and Evince are believed to be impacted. This vulnerability affects NSS < 3.73 and NSS < 3.68.1. • https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1737470 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-594438.pdf https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_68_1_RTM https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_73_RTM https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202212-05 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20211229-0002 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2021-51 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://www.starwindsoftw • CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •

CVSS: 9.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

A flaw was found in the way CHACHA20-POLY1305 was implemented in NSS in versions before 3.55. When using multi-part Chacha20, it could cause out-of-bounds reads. This issue was fixed by explicitly disabling multi-part ChaCha20 (which was not functioning correctly) and strictly enforcing tag length. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality and system availability. Se encontró un fallo en la manera en que se implementó CHACHA20-POLY1305 en NSS en versiones anteriores a 3.55. • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868931 https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Projects/NSS/NSS_3.55_release_notes https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/02/msg00021.html https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230324-0006 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-12403 • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 2%CPEs: 104EXPL: 0

A Null pointer dereference vulnerability exists in Mozilla Network Security Services due to a missing NULL check in PK11_SignWithSymKey / ssl3_ComputeRecordMACConstantTime, which could let a remote malicious user cause a Denial of Service. Existe una vulnerabilidad de desreferencia de puntero nulo en Mozilla Network Security Services debido a una falta de verificación NULL en PK11_SignWithSymKey / ssl3_ComputeRecordMACConstantTime, lo que podría permitir que un usuario malintencionado remoto cause una Denegación de servicio. A NULL pointer dereference flaw was found in the way NSS handled invalid Diffie-Hellman keys. A remote client could use this flaw to crash a TLS/SSL server using NSS. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-12/msg00011.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-12/msg00037.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-12/msg00049.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2779.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94349 http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-3163-1 https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa137 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1306103 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa&#x • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •

CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0

The s_mp_div function in lib/freebl/mpi/mpi.c in Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) before 3.21, as used in Mozilla Firefox before 44.0, improperly divides numbers, which might make it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by leveraging use of the (1) mp_div or (2) mp_exptmod function. La función s_mp_div en lib/freebl/mpi/mpi.c en Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) en versiones anteriores a 3.21, como se utiliza en Mozilla Firefox en versiones anteriores a 44.0, no divide adecuadamente números, lo que podría hacer mas fácil para atacantes remotos vencer el mecanismo de protección criptográfico mediante el aprovechamiento del uso de la función (1) mp_div o (2) mp_exptmod. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00001.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00002.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00010.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3688 http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2016/mfsa2016-07.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2016-2881720.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/81955 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/91787 http:/&#x • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues •

CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 21EXPL: 5

The TLS protocol, and the SSL protocol 3.0 and possibly earlier, as used in Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.0, mod_ssl in the Apache HTTP Server 2.2.14 and earlier, OpenSSL before 0.9.8l, GnuTLS 2.8.5 and earlier, Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) 3.12.4 and earlier, multiple Cisco products, and other products, does not properly associate renegotiation handshakes with an existing connection, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to insert data into HTTPS sessions, and possibly other types of sessions protected by TLS or SSL, by sending an unauthenticated request that is processed retroactively by a server in a post-renegotiation context, related to a "plaintext injection" attack, aka the "Project Mogul" issue. El protocolo TLS y el protocolo SSL v3.0 y posiblemente versiones anteriores, tal y como se usa en Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) v7.0, mod_ssl en el servidor HTTP Apache v2.2.14 y anteriores, OpenSSL antes de v0.9.8l, GnuTLS v2.8.5 y anteriores, Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) v3.12.4 y anteriores, y otros productos, no asocia apropiadamente la renegociación del Handshake SSL en una conexión existente, lo que permite ataques man-in-the-middle en los que el atacante inserta datos en sesiones HTTPS, y posiblemente otro tipo de sesiones protegidas por SSL o TLS, enviando una petición de autenticación que es procesada retroactivamente por un servidor en un contexto post-renegociación. Se trata de un ataque de "inyección de texto plano", también conocido como el problema del "Proyecto Mogul". • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/10071 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/10579 http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2013-11/0120.html http://blog.g-sec.lu/2009/11/tls-sslv3-renegotiation-vulnerability.html http://blogs.iss.net/archive/sslmitmiscsrf.html http://blogs.sun.com/security/entry/vulnerability_in_tls_protocol_during http://clicky.me/tlsvuln http://extendedsubset.com/?p=8 http://extendedsubset.com/Renegotiating_TLS.pdf http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsuppo • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation CWE-300: Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint •