CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2024-3566 – Command injection vulnerability in programing languages on Microsoft Windows operating system.
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-3566
A command inject vulnerability allows an attacker to perform command injection on Windows applications that indirectly depend on the CreateProcess function when the specific conditions are satisfied. • https://flatt.tech/research/posts/batbadbut-you-cant-securely-execute-commands-on-windows https://kb.cert.org/vuls/id/123335 https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/archive/blogs/twistylittlepassagesallalike/everyone-quotes-command-line-arguments-the-wrong-way https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-1874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22423 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24576 https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/123335 •
CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 17EXPL: 1CVE-2021-44533 – nodejs: Incorrect handling of certificate subject and issuer fields
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-44533
Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 did not handle multi-value Relative Distinguished Names correctly. Attackers could craft certificate subjects containing a single-value Relative Distinguished Name that would be interpreted as a multi-value Relative Distinguished Name, for example, in order to inject a Common Name that would allow bypassing the certificate subject verification.Affected versions of Node.js that do not accept multi-value Relative Distinguished Names and are thus not vulnerable to such attacks themselves. However, third-party code that uses node's ambiguous presentation of certificate subjects may be vulnerable. Node.js versiones anteriores a 12.22.9, versiones anteriores a 14.18.3, versiones anteriores a 16.13.2, y versiones anteriores a 17.3.1, no manejaba correctamente los Nombres Distinguidos Relativos de varios valores. Los atacantes podrían diseñar sujetos de certificados que contengan un Nombre Distinguido Relativo de un solo valor que sería interpretado como un Nombre Distinguido Relativo de varios valores, por ejemplo, para inyectar un Nombre Común que permitiría omitir la verificación del sujeto del certificado. • https://hackerone.com/reports/1429694 https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/jan-2022-security-releases https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220325-0007 https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5170 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-44533 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040856 • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation •
CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 16EXPL: 1CVE-2021-44532 – nodejs: Certificate Verification Bypass via String Injection
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-44532
Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 converts SANs (Subject Alternative Names) to a string format. It uses this string to check peer certificates against hostnames when validating connections. The string format was subject to an injection vulnerability when name constraints were used within a certificate chain, allowing the bypass of these name constraints.Versions of Node.js with the fix for this escape SANs containing the problematic characters in order to prevent the injection. This behavior can be reverted through the --security-revert command-line option. Node.js versiones anteriores a 12.22.9, versiones anteriores a 14.18.3, versiones anteriores a 16.13.2 y versiones anteriores a 17.3.1, convierte los SAN (Subject Alternative Names) a un formato de cadena. usa esta cadena para comprobar los certificados de los compañeros con los nombres de host cuando comprueba las conexiones. • https://hackerone.com/reports/1429694 https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/jan-2022-security-releases https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220325-0007 https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5170 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-44532 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040846 • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation CWE-296: Improper Following of a Certificate's Chain of Trust •
CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 15EXPL: 0CVE-2021-44531 – nodejs: Improper handling of URI Subject Alternative Names
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-44531
Accepting arbitrary Subject Alternative Name (SAN) types, unless a PKI is specifically defined to use a particular SAN type, can result in bypassing name-constrained intermediates. Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 was accepting URI SAN types, which PKIs are often not defined to use. Additionally, when a protocol allows URI SANs, Node.js did not match the URI correctly.Versions of Node.js with the fix for this disable the URI SAN type when checking a certificate against a hostname. This behavior can be reverted through the --security-revert command-line option. Aceptar tipos de nombres alternativos de sujeto (SAN) arbitrarios, a menos que una PKI esté definida específicamente para usar un tipo de SAN concreto, puede resultar en una omisión de los intermediarios con restricción de nombre. • https://hackerone.com/reports/1429694 https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/jan-2022-security-releases https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220325-0007 https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5170 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-44531 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040839 • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation •
CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 56EXPL: 0CVE-2021-3450 – CA certificate check bypass with X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-3450
The X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT flag enables additional security checks of the certificates present in a certificate chain. It is not set by default. Starting from OpenSSL version 1.1.1h a check to disallow certificates in the chain that have explicitly encoded elliptic curve parameters was added as an additional strict check. An error in the implementation of this check meant that the result of a previous check to confirm that certificates in the chain are valid CA certificates was overwritten. This effectively bypasses the check that non-CA certificates must not be able to issue other certificates. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/1 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/4 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=2a40b7bc7b94dd7de897a74571e7024f0cf0d63b https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA44845 https://kc.mc • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation •