13 results (0.010 seconds)

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 97%CPEs: 16EXPL: 28

In spring cloud gateway versions prior to 3.1.1+ and 3.0.7+ , applications are vulnerable to a code injection attack when the Gateway Actuator endpoint is enabled, exposed and unsecured. A remote attacker could make a maliciously crafted request that could allow arbitrary remote execution on the remote host. En spring cloud gateway versiones anteriores a 3.1.1+ y a 3.0.7+ , las aplicaciones son vulnerables a un ataque de inyección de código cuando el endpoint del Actuador de la Puerta de Enlace está habilitado, expuesto y sin seguridad. Un atacante remoto podría realizar una petición maliciosamente diseñada que podría permitir una ejecución remota arbitraria en el host remoto Spring Cloud Gateway version 3.1.0 suffers from a remote code execution vulnerability. Spring Cloud Gateway applications are vulnerable to a code injection attack when the Gateway Actuator endpoint is enabled, exposed and unsecured. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/50799 https://github.com/lucksec/Spring-Cloud-Gateway-CVE-2022-22947 https://github.com/0x7eTeam/CVE-2022-22947 https://github.com/tangxiaofeng7/CVE-2022-22947-Spring-Cloud-Gateway https://github.com/crowsec-edtech/CVE-2022-22947 https://github.com/0730Nophone/CVE-2022-22947- https://github.com/Wrin9/CVE-2022-22947 https://github.com/M0ge/CVE-2022-22947-Spring-Cloud-Gateway-SpelRCE https://github.com/nanaao/CVE-2022-22947-POC https:// • CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') CWE-917: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an Expression Language Statement ('Expression Language Injection') •

CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0

In Spring Framework versions 5.3.0 - 5.3.13, 5.2.0 - 5.2.18, and older unsupported versions, it is possible for a user to provide malicious input to cause the insertion of additional log entries. This is a follow-up to CVE-2021-22096 that protects against additional types of input and in more places of the Spring Framework codebase. En Spring Framework versiones 5.3.0 - 5.3.13, 5.2.0 - 5.2.18, y en las versiones anteriores no soportadas, es posible que un usuario proporcione una entrada maliciosa que cause una inserción de entradas de registro adicionales. Se trata de un seguimiento de CVE-2021-22096 que protege contra tipos adicionales de entrada y en más lugares de la base de código de Spring Framework • https://tanzu.vmware.com/security/cve-2021-22060 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-22060 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055480 •

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 96%CPEs: 213EXPL: 7

Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1. Apache Log4j2 versiones 2.0-alpha1 hasta 2.16.0 (excluyendo las versiones 2.12.3 y 2.3.1) no protegían de la recursión no controlada de las búsquedas autorreferenciales. Esto permite a un atacante con control sobre los datos de Thread Context Map causar una denegación de servicio cuando es interpretada una cadena diseñada. • https://github.com/thedevappsecguy/Log4J-Mitigation-CVE-2021-44228--CVE-2021-45046--CVE-2021-45105--CVE-2021-44832 https://github.com/tejas-nagchandi/CVE-2021-45105 https://github.com/pravin-pp/log4j2-CVE-2021-45105 https://github.com/dileepdkumar/https-github.com-pravin-pp-log4j2-CVE-2021-45105-1 https://github.com/dileepdkumar/https-github.com-pravin-pp-log4j2-CVE-2021-45105 https://github.com/dileepdkumar/https-github.com-dileepdkumar-https-github.com-pravin-pp-log4j2-CVE-2021-45105-v htt • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-674: Uncontrolled Recursion •

CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0

In Spring Framework versions 5.3.0 - 5.3.10, 5.2.0 - 5.2.17, and older unsupported versions, it is possible for a user to provide malicious input to cause the insertion of additional log entries. En Spring Framework versiones 5.3.0 - 5.3.10, 5.2.0 - 5.2.17, y en versiones anteriores no soportadas, es posible para un usuario proporcionar una entrada maliciosa para causar una inserción de entradas de registro adicionales • https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20211125-0005 https://tanzu.vmware.com/security/cve-2021-22096 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-22096 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034584 • CWE-117: Improper Output Neutralization for Logs •

CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 46EXPL: 1

When curl >= 7.20.0 and <= 7.78.0 connects to an IMAP or POP3 server to retrieve data using STARTTLS to upgrade to TLS security, the server can respond and send back multiple responses at once that curl caches. curl would then upgrade to TLS but not flush the in-queue of cached responses but instead continue using and trustingthe responses it got *before* the TLS handshake as if they were authenticated.Using this flaw, it allows a Man-In-The-Middle attacker to first inject the fake responses, then pass-through the TLS traffic from the legitimate server and trick curl into sending data back to the user thinking the attacker's injected data comes from the TLS-protected server. Cuando en curl versiones posteriores a 7.20.0 incluyéndola, y versiones anteriores a 7.78.0 incluyéndola, se conecta a un servidor IMAP o POP3 para recuperar datos usando STARTTLS para actualizar a la seguridad TLS, el servidor puede responder y enviar múltiples respuestas a la vez que curl almacena en caché. curl entonces actualizaría a TLS pero no vaciaría la cola de respuestas almacenadas en caché, sino que continuaría usando y confiando en las respuestas que obtuvo *antes* del protocolo de enlace TLS como si estuvieran autenticadas. Usando este fallo, permite a un atacante de tipo Man-In-The-Middle inyectar primero las respuestas falsas, luego pasar mediante el tráfico TLS del servidor legítimo y engañar a curl para que envíe datos de vuelta al usuario pensando que los datos inyectados por el atacante provienen del servidor protegido por TLS A flaw was found in curl. The flaw lies in how curl handles cached or pipelined responses that it receives from either a IMAP, POP3, SMTP or FTP server before the TLS upgrade using STARTTLS. In such a scenario curl even after upgrading to TLS would trust these cached responses treating them as valid and authenticated and use them. • http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Mar/29 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://hackerone.com/reports/1334763 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/09/msg00022.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/08/msg00017.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/APOAK4X73EJTAPTSVT7IRVDMUWVXNWGD https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RWLEC6YVEM2HWUBX67 • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues CWE-319: Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity •