CVSS: 9.0EPSS: 1%CPEs: 39EXPL: 0CVE-2022-23307 – A deserialization flaw in the Chainsaw component of Log4j 1 can lead to malicious code execution.
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-23307
CVE-2020-9493 identified a deserialization issue that was present in Apache Chainsaw. Prior to Chainsaw V2.0 Chainsaw was a component of Apache Log4j 1.2.x where the same issue exists. CVE-2020-9493 identificó un problema de deserialización presente en Apache Chainsaw. Versiones anteriores a Chainsaw V2.0 Chainsaw era un componente de Apache Log4j versiones 1.2.x donde se presenta el mismo problema A flaw was found in the log4j 1.x chainsaw component, where the contents of certain log entries are deserialized and possibly permit code execution. This flaw allows an attacker to send a malicious request with serialized data to the server to be deserialized when the chainsaw component is run. • https://lists.apache.org/thread/rg4yyc89vs3dw6kpy3r92xop9loywyhh https://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/index.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-23307 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041967 • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0CVE-2022-23305 – SQL injection in JDBC Appender in Apache Log4j V1
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-23305
By design, the JDBCAppender in Log4j 1.2.x accepts an SQL statement as a configuration parameter where the values to be inserted are converters from PatternLayout. The message converter, %m, is likely to always be included. This allows attackers to manipulate the SQL by entering crafted strings into input fields or headers of an application that are logged allowing unintended SQL queries to be executed. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.x when specifically configured to use the JDBCAppender, which is not the default. Beginning in version 2.0-beta8, the JDBCAppender was re-introduced with proper support for parameterized SQL queries and further customization over the columns written to in logs. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/01/18/4 https://lists.apache.org/thread/pt6lh3pbsvxqlwlp4c5l798dv2hkc85y https://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/index.html https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220217-0007 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-23305 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041959 • CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') •
CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 40EXPL: 0CVE-2022-23302 – Deserialization of untrusted data in JMSSink in Apache Log4j 1.x
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-23302
JMSSink in all versions of Log4j 1.x is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration or if the configuration references an LDAP service the attacker has access to. The attacker can provide a TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configuration causing JMSSink to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-4104. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.x when specifically configured to use JMSSink, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/01/18/3 https://lists.apache.org/thread/bsr3l5qz4g0myrjhy9h67bcxodpkwj4w https://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/index.html https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220217-0006 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-23302 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041949 • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 15%CPEs: 72EXPL: 0CVE-2021-4104 – Deserialization of untrusted data in JMSAppender in Apache Log4j 1.2
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-4104
JMSAppender in Log4j 1.2 is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration. The attacker can provide TopicBindingName and TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configurations causing JMSAppender to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-44228. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.2 when specifically configured to use JMSAppender, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/01/18/3 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-4104 https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/608#issuecomment-990494126 https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2021-0033 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202209-02 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202310-16 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202312-02 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202312-04 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20211223-0007 https&# • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 46EXPL: 1CVE-2021-22947 – curl: Server responses received before STARTTLS processed after TLS handshake
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-22947
When curl >= 7.20.0 and <= 7.78.0 connects to an IMAP or POP3 server to retrieve data using STARTTLS to upgrade to TLS security, the server can respond and send back multiple responses at once that curl caches. curl would then upgrade to TLS but not flush the in-queue of cached responses but instead continue using and trustingthe responses it got *before* the TLS handshake as if they were authenticated.Using this flaw, it allows a Man-In-The-Middle attacker to first inject the fake responses, then pass-through the TLS traffic from the legitimate server and trick curl into sending data back to the user thinking the attacker's injected data comes from the TLS-protected server. Cuando en curl versiones posteriores a 7.20.0 incluyéndola, y versiones anteriores a 7.78.0 incluyéndola, se conecta a un servidor IMAP o POP3 para recuperar datos usando STARTTLS para actualizar a la seguridad TLS, el servidor puede responder y enviar múltiples respuestas a la vez que curl almacena en caché. curl entonces actualizaría a TLS pero no vaciaría la cola de respuestas almacenadas en caché, sino que continuaría usando y confiando en las respuestas que obtuvo *antes* del protocolo de enlace TLS como si estuvieran autenticadas. Usando este fallo, permite a un atacante de tipo Man-In-The-Middle inyectar primero las respuestas falsas, luego pasar mediante el tráfico TLS del servidor legítimo y engañar a curl para que envíe datos de vuelta al usuario pensando que los datos inyectados por el atacante provienen del servidor protegido por TLS A flaw was found in curl. The flaw lies in how curl handles cached or pipelined responses that it receives from either a IMAP, POP3, SMTP or FTP server before the TLS upgrade using STARTTLS. In such a scenario curl even after upgrading to TLS would trust these cached responses treating them as valid and authenticated and use them. • http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Mar/29 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://hackerone.com/reports/1334763 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/09/msg00022.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/08/msg00017.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/APOAK4X73EJTAPTSVT7IRVDMUWVXNWGD https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RWLEC6YVEM2HWUBX67 • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues CWE-319: Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity •