CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 97%CPEs: 10EXPL: 29CVE-2021-42013 – Apache HTTP Server Path Traversal Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-42013
It was found that the fix for CVE-2021-41773 in Apache HTTP Server 2.4.50 was insufficient. An attacker could use a path traversal attack to map URLs to files outside the directories configured by Alias-like directives. If files outside of these directories are not protected by the usual default configuration "require all denied", these requests can succeed. If CGI scripts are also enabled for these aliased pathes, this could allow for remote code execution. This issue only affects Apache 2.4.49 and Apache 2.4.50 and not earlier versions. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/50406 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/50446 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/50512 https://github.com/andrea-mattioli/apache-exploit-CVE-2021-42013 https://github.com/asaotomo/CVE-2021-42013-Apache-RCE-Poc-Exp https://github.com/BassoNicolas/CVE-2021-42013 https://github.com/TheLastVvV/CVE-2021-42013 https://github.com/rafifdna/CVE-2021-42013 https://github.com/rnsss/CVE-2021-42013 https://github.com/LayarKacaSiber/CVE-2021-42013 • CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 6EXPL: 1CVE-2021-33193 – Request splitting via HTTP/2 method injection and mod_proxy
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-33193
A crafted method sent through HTTP/2 will bypass validation and be forwarded by mod_proxy, which can lead to request splitting or cache poisoning. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.17 to 2.4.48. Un método diseñado enviado mediante HTTP/2 omitirá la comprobación y será reenviado por mod_proxy, lo que puede conllevar a la división de peticiones o el envenenamiento de la caché. Este problema afecta a Apache HTTP Server versiones 2.4.17 a 2.4.48. A NULL pointer dereference was found in Apache httpd mod_h2. • https://github.com/apache/httpd/commit/ecebcc035ccd8d0e2984fe41420d9e944f456b3c.patch https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/re4162adc051c1a0a79e7a24093f3776373e8733abaff57253fef341d%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ree7519d71415ecdd170ff1889cab552d71758d2ba2904a17ded21a70%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/03/msg00002.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DSM6UWQICBJ2TU727RENU3HBKEAFLT6T https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives&#x • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 71%CPEs: 12EXPL: 0CVE-2021-26691 – Apache HTTP Server mod_session response handling heap overflow
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-26691
In Apache HTTP Server versions 2.4.0 to 2.4.46 a specially crafted SessionHeader sent by an origin server could cause a heap overflow Apache HTTP Server versiones 2.4.0 a 2.4.46 , un parámetro SessionHeader especialmente diseñado enviado por un servidor de origen podría causar un desbordamiento de pila A heap overflow flaw was found In Apache httpd mod_session. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability. • http://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/06/10/7 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r50cae1b71f1e7421069036b213c26da7d8f47dd59874e3bd956959fe%40%3Cannounce.httpd.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7f2b70b621651548f4b6f027552f1dd91705d7111bb5d15cda0a68dd%40%3Cdev.httpd.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/re026d3da9d7824bd93b9f871c0fdda978d960c7e62d8c43cba8d0bf3%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/07/msg00006 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 205EXPL: 0CVE-2021-3449 – NULL pointer deref in signature_algorithms processing
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-3449
An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/1 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/4 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-772220.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=fb9fa6b51defd48157eeb207f52181f735d96148 https://kb.pulse • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •
CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 56EXPL: 0CVE-2021-3450 – CA certificate check bypass with X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-3450
The X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT flag enables additional security checks of the certificates present in a certificate chain. It is not set by default. Starting from OpenSSL version 1.1.1h a check to disallow certificates in the chain that have explicitly encoded elliptic curve parameters was added as an additional strict check. An error in the implementation of this check meant that the result of a previous check to confirm that certificates in the chain are valid CA certificates was overwritten. This effectively bypasses the check that non-CA certificates must not be able to issue other certificates. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/1 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/4 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=2a40b7bc7b94dd7de897a74571e7024f0cf0d63b https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA44845 https://kc.mc • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation •