CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 81%CPEs: 84EXPL: 2CVE-2016-3715 – ImageMagick Arbitrary File Deletion Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-3715
The EPHEMERAL coder in ImageMagick before 6.9.3-10 and 7.x before 7.0.1-1 allows remote attackers to delete arbitrary files via a crafted image. El codificador EPHEMERAL en ImageMagick en versiones anteriores a 6.9.3-10 y 7.x en versiones anteriores a 7.0.1-1 permite a atacantes remotos eliminar archivos arbitrarios a través de una imagen manipulada. It was discovered that certain ImageMagick coders and pseudo-protocols did not properly prevent security sensitive operations when processing specially crafted images. A remote attacker could create a specially crafted image that, when processed by an application using ImageMagick or an unsuspecting user using the ImageMagick utilities, would allow the attacker to delete arbitrary files. ImageMagick contains an unspecified vulnerability that could allow users to delete files by using ImageMagick's 'ephemeral' pseudo protocol, which deletes files after reading. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39767 http://git.imagemagick.org/repos/ImageMagick/blob/a01518e08c840577cabd7d3ff291a9ba735f7276/ChangeLog http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00024.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00025.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00028.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00051.html http&# • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 93%CPEs: 84EXPL: 1CVE-2016-3718 – ImageMagick Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-3718
The (1) HTTP and (2) FTP coders in ImageMagick before 6.9.3-10 and 7.x before 7.0.1-1 allow remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted image. Los codificadores (1) HTTP y (2) FTP en ImageMagick en versiones anteriores a 6.9.3-10 y 7.x en versiones anteriores a 7.0.1-1 permiten a atacantes remotos llevar a cabo ataques de falsificación de peticiones del lado del servidor (SSRF) a través de una imagen manipulada. A server-side request forgery flaw was discovered in the way ImageMagick processed certain images. A remote attacker could exploit this flaw to mislead an application using ImageMagick or an unsuspecting user using the ImageMagick utilities into, for example, performing HTTP(S) requests or opening FTP sessions via specially crafted images. ImageMagick contains an unspecified vulnerability that allows attackers to perform server-side request forgery (SSRF) via a crafted image. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39767 http://git.imagemagick.org/repos/ImageMagick/blob/a01518e08c840577cabd7d3ff291a9ba735f7276/ChangeLog http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00024.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00025.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00028.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00051.html http&# • CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 64EXPL: 0CVE-2015-4902 – Oracle Java SE Integrity Check Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-4902
Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u101, 7u85, and 8u60 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Deployment. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en Oracle Java SE 6u101, 7u85 y 8u60 permite a atacantes remotos afectar a la integridad a través de vectores desconocidos relacionados con Deployment. Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE allows remote attackers to affect integrity via Unknown vectors related to deployment. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-11/msg00009.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-12/msg00000.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-12/msg00001.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-12/msg00003.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-12/msg00004.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-12/msg00006.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-12 •
CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 65EXPL: 0CVE-2015-5165 – Qemu: rtl8139 uninitialized heap memory information leakage to guest (XSA-140)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-5165
The C+ mode offload emulation in the RTL8139 network card device model in QEMU, as used in Xen 4.5.x and earlier, allows remote attackers to read process heap memory via unspecified vectors. Vulnerabilidad en la emulación de modo offload C+ en el modelo de tarjeta de red del dispositivo RTL8139 en QEMU, tal y como se utiliza en Xen 4.5.x y versiones anteriores, permite a atacantes remotos leer la memoria dinámica del proceso a través de vectores no especificados. An information leak flaw was found in the way QEMU's RTL8139 emulation implementation processed network packets under RTL8139 controller's C+ mode of operation. An unprivileged guest user could use this flaw to read up to 65 KB of uninitialized QEMU heap memory. • http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-September/165373.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-September/167792.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-September/167820.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-08/msg00018.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-09/msg00027.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1674.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1683.html http: • CWE-456: Missing Initialization of a Variable CWE-908: Use of Uninitialized Resource •
CVSS: 6.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 51EXPL: 1CVE-2015-3214 – QEMU - Programmable Interrupt Timer Controller Heap Overflow
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-3214
The pit_ioport_read in i8254.c in the Linux kernel before 2.6.33 and QEMU before 2.3.1 does not distinguish between read lengths and write lengths, which might allow guest OS users to execute arbitrary code on the host OS by triggering use of an invalid index. Vulnerabilidad en pit_ioport_read en i8254.c en el kernel de Linux en versiones anteriores a 2.6.33 y en QEMU en versiones anteriores a 2.3.1, no distingue entre longitudes de lectura y longitudes de escritura, lo que podría permitir a los usuarios invitados del SO ejecutar código arbitrario en el host del SO desencadenando el uso de un índice no válido. An out-of-bounds memory access flaw, leading to memory corruption or possibly an information leak, was found in QEMU's pit_ioport_read() function. A privileged guest user in a QEMU guest, which had QEMU PIT emulation enabled, could potentially, in rare cases, use this flaw to execute arbitrary code on the host with the privileges of the hosting QEMU process. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/37990 http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=ee73f656a604d5aa9df86a97102e4e462dd79924 http://mirror.linux.org.au/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.33 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1507.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1508.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1512.html http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3348 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/06/25/7 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •