CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0CVE-2016-2051 – chromium-browser: Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Google V8 before 4.8.271.17
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-2051
Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Google V8 before 4.8.271.17, as used in Google Chrome before 48.0.2564.82, allow attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have other impact via unknown vectors. Múltiples vulnerabilidades no especificadas en Google V8 en versiones anteriores a 4.8.271.17, tal como se utiliza en Google Chrome en versiones anteriores a 48.0.2564.82, permiten a atacantes provocar una denegación de servicio o posiblemente tener otro impacto a través de vectores desconocidos. • http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2016/01/stable-channel-update_20.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0072.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/81431 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1034801 http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2877-1 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2051 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301550 •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0CVE-2015-1284 – chromium-browser: Use-after-free in blink.
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-1284
The LocalFrame::isURLAllowed function in core/frame/LocalFrame.cpp in Blink, as used in Google Chrome before 44.0.2403.89, does not properly check for a page's maximum number of frames, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (invalid count value and use-after-free) or possibly have unspecified other impact via crafted JavaScript code that makes many createElement calls for IFRAME elements. Vulnerabilidad en la función LocalFrame::isURLAllowed en core/frame/LocalFrame.cpp en Blink implementada en Google Chrome en versiones anteriores a la 44.0.2403.89, no verifica correctamente el número máximo de marcos de una página, lo que permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio mediante un valor contador no válido y mediante un fallo después de una liberación de memoria, posiblemente pueda tener otro impacto no especificado a través de código JavaScript manipulado que realiza numerosas llamadas createElement para el IFRAME elements. • http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2015/07/stable-channel-update_21.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00038.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1499.html http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3315 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/75973 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1033031 https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=493243 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201603-09 https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/blink?revision=197139&am • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-416: Use After Free •
CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 2%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0CVE-2015-1274 – chromium-browser: Settings allowed executable files to run immediately after download in unsepcified
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-1274
Google Chrome before 44.0.2403.89 does not ensure that the auto-open list omits all dangerous file types, which makes it easier for remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by providing a crafted file and leveraging a user's previous "Always open files of this type" choice, related to download_commands.cc and download_prefs.cc. Vulnerabilidad en versiones anteriores a la 44.0.2403.89 de Google Chrome, no asegura que la lista de auto-apertura, omita todos los tipos de archivos peligrosos. Lo cual permite que sea más fácil para atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario al proporcionar un archivo manipulado y aprovechar la elección 'siempre abrir archivos de este tipo ' de un usuario, error relacionado con download_commands.cc y download_prefs.cc. • http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2015/07/stable-channel-update_21.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00038.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1499.html http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3315 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/75973 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1033031 https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=461858 https://codereview.chromium.org/1165893004 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201603-09 https:// • CWE-254: 7PK - Security Features •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 97%CPEs: 147EXPL: 1CVE-2014-3566 – SSL/TLS: Padding Oracle On Downgraded Legacy Encryption attack
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-3566
The SSL protocol 3.0, as used in OpenSSL through 1.0.1i and other products, uses nondeterministic CBC padding, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain cleartext data via a padding-oracle attack, aka the "POODLE" issue. El protocolo SSL 3.0, utilizado en OpenSSL hasta 1.0.1i y otros productos, utiliza relleno (padding) CBC no determinístico, lo que facilita a los atacantes man-in-the-middle obtener datos de texto plano a través de un ataque de relleno (padding) oracle, también conocido como el problema "POODLE". A flaw was found in the way SSL 3.0 handled padding bytes when decrypting messages encrypted using block ciphers in cipher block chaining (CBC) mode. This flaw allows a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacker to decrypt a selected byte of a cipher text in as few as 256 tries if they are able to force a victim application to repeatedly send the same data over newly created SSL 3.0 connections. • https://github.com/mikesplain/CVE-2014-3566-poodle-cookbook ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2014-015.txt.asc http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2014-0416.html http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/openssl_advisory11.asc http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2014-10/0101.html http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2014-10/0103.html http://askubuntu.com/questions/537196/how-do-i-patch-workaround-sslv3-poodle-vulnerability-cve-2014-3566 http& • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues CWE-757: Selection of Less-Secure Algorithm During Negotiation ('Algorithm Downgrade') •