CVE-2023-44487 – HTTP/2 Rapid Reset Attack Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-44487
The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023. El protocolo HTTP/2 permite una denegación de servicio (consumo de recursos del servidor) porque la cancelación de solicitudes puede restablecer muchas transmisiones rápidamente, como se explotó en la naturaleza entre agosto y octubre de 2023. A flaw was found in handling multiplexed streams in the HTTP/2 protocol. A client can repeatedly make a request for a new multiplex stream and immediately send an RST_STREAM frame to cancel it. This creates extra work for the server setting up and tearing down the streams while not hitting any server-side limit for the maximum number of active streams per connection, resulting in a denial of service due to server resource consumption. • https://github.com/imabee101/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/studiogangster/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/bcdannyboy/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/sigridou/CVE-2023-44487- https://github.com/ByteHackr/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/ReToCode/golang-CVE-2023-44487 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/13/4 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/13/9 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/18/4 http://www. • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVE-2020-27827 – lldp/openvswitch: denial of service via externally triggered memory leak
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-27827
A flaw was found in multiple versions of OpenvSwitch. Specially crafted LLDP packets can cause memory to be lost when allocating data to handle specific optional TLVs, potentially causing a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability. Se encontró un fallo en múltiples versiones de OpenvSwitch. Los paquetes LLDP especialmente diseñados pueden causar que una memoria se pierda cuando se asignan datos para manejar TLV opcionales específicos, potencialmente causando una denegación de servicio. • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1921438 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-941426.pdf https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3T5XHPOGIPWCRRPJUE6P3HVC5PTSD5JS https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JYA4AMJXCNF6UPFG36L2TPPT32C242SP https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SKQWHG2SZJZSGC7PXVDAEJYBN7ESDR7D https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2021 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVE-2019-15718 – systemd: systemd-resolved allows unprivileged users to configure DNS
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-15718
In systemd 240, bus_open_system_watch_bind_with_description in shared/bus-util.c (as used by systemd-resolved to connect to the system D-Bus instance), calls sd_bus_set_trusted, which disables access controls for incoming D-Bus messages. An unprivileged user can exploit this by executing D-Bus methods that should be restricted to privileged users, in order to change the system's DNS resolver settings. En systemd versión 240, la función bus_open_system_watch_bind_with_description en el archivo shared/bus-util.c (como es usado en systemd-resolve para conectarse a la instancia del sistema D-Bus), llama a sd_bus_set_trusted, lo que deshabilita los controles de acceso para los mensajes entrantes de D-Bus. Un usuario no privilegiado puede explotar esto mediante la ejecución de métodos D-Bus que deberían estar restringidos para usuarios con privilegios, para cambiar la configuración de la resolución DNS. An improper authorization flaw was discovered in systemd-resolved in the way it configures the exposed DBus interface org.freedesktop.resolve1. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/09/03/1 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3592 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3941 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746057 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BRE5IS24XTF5WNZGH2L7GSQJKARBOEGL https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HIKGKXZ5OEGOEYURHLJHEMFYNLEGAW5B https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce% • CWE-285: Improper Authorization •
CVE-2014-0160 – OpenSSL Information Disclosure Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-0160
The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via crafted packets that trigger a buffer over-read, as demonstrated by reading private keys, related to d1_both.c and t1_lib.c, aka the Heartbleed bug. Las implementaciones de (1) TLS y (2) DTLS en OpenSSL 1.0.1 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.1g no manejan adecuadamente paquetes Heartbeat Extension, lo que permite a atacantes remotos obtener información sensible desde la memoria de proceso a través de paquetes manipulados que desencadenan una sobrelectura del buffer, según lo demostrado mediante la lectura de claves privadas, relacionado con d1_both.c y t1_lib.c, también conocido como bug Heartbleed. An information disclosure flaw was found in the way OpenSSL handled TLS and DTLS Heartbeat Extension packets. A malicious TLS or DTLS client or server could send a specially crafted TLS or DTLS Heartbeat packet to disclose a limited portion of memory per request from a connected client or server. Note that the disclosed portions of memory could potentially include sensitive information such as private keys. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/32764 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/32791 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/32998 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/32745 https://github.com/0x90/CVE-2014-0160 https://github.com/jdauphant/patch-openssl-CVE-2014-0160 https://github.com/caiqiqi/OpenSSL-HeartBleed-CVE-2014-0160-PoC https://github.com/obayesshelton/CVE-2014-0160-Scanner https://github.com/MrE-Fog/CVE-2014-0160-Chrome-Plugin https://github.com/Xyl2k/CVE-2014 • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read CWE-201: Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data •
CVE-2008-2376 – ruby: integer overflows in rb_ary_fill() / Array#fill
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2008-2376
Integer overflow in the rb_ary_fill function in array.c in Ruby before revision 17756 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a call to the Array#fill method with a start (aka beg) argument greater than ARY_MAX_SIZE. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for other closely related integer overflows. Desbordamiento de entero en la función rb_ary_fill en array.c en Ruby antes de la revisión 17756 que permite a los atacantes dependientes de contesto causar una denegación de servicios (caída) o posiblemente otro impacto no especificado a través de la llamada al método Arrray#fill con un argumento de entrada (alias beg) mayor que ARY_MAX_SIZE NOTA: esto existe por un parche incompleto para otros desbordamientos de enteros • http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce//2008/Sep/msg00005.html http://secunia.com/advisories/30927 http://secunia.com/advisories/31006 http://secunia.com/advisories/31062 http://secunia.com/advisories/31090 http://secunia.com/advisories/31181 http://secunia.com/advisories/31256 http://secunia.com/advisories/32219 http://secunia.com/advisories/33178 http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200812-17.xml http://svn.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision • CWE-189: Numeric Errors CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •