CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 83%CPEs: 444EXPL: 7CVE-2023-44487 – HTTP/2 Rapid Reset Attack Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-44487
The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023. El protocolo HTTP/2 permite una denegación de servicio (consumo de recursos del servidor) porque la cancelación de solicitudes puede restablecer muchas transmisiones rápidamente, como se explotó en la naturaleza entre agosto y octubre de 2023. A flaw was found in handling multiplexed streams in the HTTP/2 protocol. A client can repeatedly make a request for a new multiplex stream and immediately send an RST_STREAM frame to cancel it. This creates extra work for the server setting up and tearing down the streams while not hitting any server-side limit for the maximum number of active streams per connection, resulting in a denial of service due to server resource consumption. • https://github.com/imabee101/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/studiogangster/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/bcdannyboy/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/sigridou/CVE-2023-44487- https://github.com/ByteHackr/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/ReToCode/golang-CVE-2023-44487 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/13/4 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/13/9 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/18/4 http://www. • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 15%CPEs: 72EXPL: 0CVE-2021-4104 – Deserialization of untrusted data in JMSAppender in Apache Log4j 1.2
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-4104
JMSAppender in Log4j 1.2 is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration. The attacker can provide TopicBindingName and TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configurations causing JMSAppender to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-44228. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.2 when specifically configured to use JMSAppender, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/01/18/3 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-4104 https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/608#issuecomment-990494126 https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2021-0033 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202209-02 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202310-16 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202312-02 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202312-04 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20211223-0007 https&# • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 13EXPL: 0CVE-2020-10693 – hibernate-validator: Improper input validation in the interpolation of constraint error messages
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-10693
A flaw was found in Hibernate Validator version 6.1.2.Final. A bug in the message interpolation processor enables invalid EL expressions to be evaluated as if they were valid. This flaw allows attackers to bypass input sanitation (escaping, stripping) controls that developers may have put in place when handling user-controlled data in error messages. Se encontró un fallo en Hibernate Validator versión 6.1.2.Final. Un error en el procesador de interpolación de mensajes permite evaluar expresiones EL no válidas como si fueran válidas. • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2020-10693 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb8dca19a4e52b60dab0ab21e2ff9968d78f4b84e4033824db1dd24b4%40%3Cpluto-scm.portals.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd418deda6f0ebe658c2015f43a14d03acb8b8c2c093c5bf6b880cd7c%40%3Cpluto-dev.portals.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9c17c3efc4a376a96e9e2777eee6acf0bec28e2200e4b35da62de4a%40%3Cpluto-dev.portals.apache.org%3E https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-202 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2012-1094
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2012-1094
JBoss AS 7 prior to 7.1.1 and mod_cluster do not handle default hostname in the same way, which can cause the excluded-contexts list to be mismatched and the root context to be exposed. JBoss AS versiones 7 anteriores a la versión 7.1.1 y mod_cluster no manejan el nombre de host predeterminado de la misma manera, lo que puede causar que la lista de contextos excluidos sea contrastada inapropiadamente y que el contexto root sea expuesto. • https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2012-1094 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2012-1094 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0CVE-2011-3609
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2011-3609
A CSRF issue was found in JBoss Application Server 7 before 7.1.0. JBoss did not properly restrict access to the management console information (for example via the "Access-Control-Allow-Origin" HTTP access control flag). This can lead to unauthorized information leak if a user with admin privileges visits a specially-crafted web page provided by a remote attacker. Se encontró un problema CSRF en JBoss Application Server 7 versiones anteriores a 7.1.0. JBoss no restringió apropiadamente el acceso a la información de la consola de administración (por ejemplo, por medio del flag de control de acceso HTTP "Access-Control-Allow-Origin"). • https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2011-3609 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2011-3609 https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2011-3609 https://www.securityfocus.com/bid/50888 • CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) •