43 results (0.012 seconds)

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 2%CPEs: 36EXPL: 0

In Apache httpd 2.0.23 to 2.0.65, 2.2.0 to 2.2.34, and 2.4.0 to 2.4.29, mod_authnz_ldap, if configured with AuthLDAPCharsetConfig, uses the Accept-Language header value to lookup the right charset encoding when verifying the user's credentials. If the header value is not present in the charset conversion table, a fallback mechanism is used to truncate it to a two characters value to allow a quick retry (for example, 'en-US' is truncated to 'en'). A header value of less than two characters forces an out of bound write of one NUL byte to a memory location that is not part of the string. In the worst case, quite unlikely, the process would crash which could be used as a Denial of Service attack. In the more likely case, this memory is already reserved for future use and the issue has no effect at all. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2018/03/24/8 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103512 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040569 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3558 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0366 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0367 https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/56c2e7cc9deb1c12a843d0dc251ea7fd3e7e80293cde02fcd65286ba%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.ht • CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 39EXPL: 0

In Apache httpd 2.2.0 to 2.4.29, when generating an HTTP Digest authentication challenge, the nonce sent to prevent reply attacks was not correctly generated using a pseudo-random seed. In a cluster of servers using a common Digest authentication configuration, HTTP requests could be replayed across servers by an attacker without detection. En Apache httpd, en versiones desde la 2.2.0 hasta la 2.4.29, cuando se genera un desafío de autenticación HTTP Digest, el nonce enviado para evitar ataques replay no se generó correctamente empleando una semilla pseudoaleatoria. En un clúster de servidores, utilizando una configuración de autenticación Digest común, las peticiones HTTP se podrían reemplazar en los servidores por un atacante si que este sea detectado. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2018/03/24/7 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103524 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040571 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3558 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0366 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0367 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1898 https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/56c2e7cc9deb1c12a843d0dc251ea7fd3e7e80293cde02fcd65286ba%40%3Ccvs.httpd. • CWE-287: Improper Authentication CWE-305: Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 13%CPEs: 87EXPL: 0

RubyGems versions between 2.0.0 and 2.6.13 are vulnerable to a possible remote code execution vulnerability. YAML deserialization of gem specifications can bypass class white lists. Specially crafted serialized objects can possibly be used to escalate to remote code execution. Las versiones de RubyGems entre la 2.0.0 y la 2.6.13 son vulnerables a una posible vulnerabilidad de ejecución remota de código. La deserialización YAML de especificaciones de gemas puede omitir listas blancas de clases. • http://blog.rubygems.org/2017/10/09/2.6.14-released.html http://blog.rubygems.org/2017/10/09/unsafe-object-deserialization-vulnerability.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101275 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3485 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0378 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0583 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0585 https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/510b1638ac9bba3ceb7a5d73135dafff9e5bab49 https://hackerone.com/reports/27499 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 8%CPEs: 23EXPL: 0

The (1) git-remote-ext and (2) unspecified other remote helper programs in Git before 2.3.10, 2.4.x before 2.4.10, 2.5.x before 2.5.4, and 2.6.x before 2.6.1 do not properly restrict the allowed protocols, which might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a URL in a (a) .gitmodules file or (b) unknown other sources in a submodule. El (1) git-remote-ext y (2) otros programas de ayuda remotos no especificados en Git en versiones anteriores a 2.3.10, 2.4.x en versiones anteriores a 2.4.10, 2.5.x en versiones anteriores a 2.5.4 y 2.6.x en versiones anteriores a 2.6.1 no restringen correctamente los protocolos permitidos, lo que podría permitir a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario a través de una URL en un (a) archivo .gitmodules u (b) otras fuentes desconocidas en un submódulo. A flaw was found in the way the git-remote-ext helper processed certain URLs. If a user had Git configured to automatically clone submodules from untrusted repositories, an attacker could inject commands into the URL of a submodule, allowing them to execute arbitrary code on the user's system. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-11/msg00066.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2515.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3435 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/12/08/5 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/12/09/8 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/12/11/7 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinapr2016-2952098.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinjan2016&# • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-77: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') CWE-284: Improper Access Control •

CVSS: 7.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0

RubyGems 2.0.x before 2.0.16, 2.2.x before 2.2.4, and 2.4.x before 2.4.7 does not validate the hostname when fetching gems or making API requests, which allows remote attackers to redirect requests to arbitrary domains via a crafted DNS SRV record, aka a "DNS hijack attack." RubyGems 2.0.x en versiones anteriores a 2.0.16, 2.2.x en versiones anteriores a 2.2.4 y 2.4.x en versiones anteriores a 2.4.7 no valida el nombre de host al recuperar gemas o hacer solicitudes de API, lo que permite a atacantes remotos redireccionar peticiones a dominios arbitrarios a través del registro DNS SRV manipulado, también conocido como un "ataque de secuestro de DNS". A flaw was found in a way rubygems verified the API endpoint hostname retrieved through a DNS SRV record. A man-in-the-middle attacker could use this flaw to force a client to download content from an untrusted domain. • http://blog.rubygems.org/2015/05/14/CVE-2015-3900.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-August/163502.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-August/163600.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-August/164236.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1657.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/06/26/2 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinoct2015-2511968.html http:// • CWE-254: 7PK - Security Features CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity •