3 results (0.010 seconds)

CVSS: 7.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 17EXPL: 0

A flaw was found in the redirect_uri validation logic in Keycloak. This issue may allow a bypass of otherwise explicitly allowed hosts. A successful attack may lead to an access token being stolen, making it possible for the attacker to impersonate other users. Se encontró un fallo en la lógica de validación de redirect_uri en Keycloak. Este problema puede permitir la omisión de hosts permitidos explícitamente. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:7854 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:7855 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:7856 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:7857 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:7858 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:7860 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:7861 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:0798 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:0799 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA • CWE-601: URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 83%CPEs: 444EXPL: 7

The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023. El protocolo HTTP/2 permite una denegación de servicio (consumo de recursos del servidor) porque la cancelación de solicitudes puede restablecer muchas transmisiones rápidamente, como se explotó en la naturaleza entre agosto y octubre de 2023. A flaw was found in handling multiplexed streams in the HTTP/2 protocol. A client can repeatedly make a request for a new multiplex stream and immediately send an RST_STREAM frame to cancel it. This creates extra work for the server setting up and tearing down the streams while not hitting any server-side limit for the maximum number of active streams per connection, resulting in a denial of service due to server resource consumption. • https://github.com/imabee101/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/studiogangster/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/bcdannyboy/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/sigridou/CVE-2023-44487- https://github.com/ByteHackr/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/ReToCode/golang-CVE-2023-44487 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/13/4 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/13/9 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/18/4 http://www. • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 10EXPL: 0

The undertow client is not checking the server identity presented by the server certificate in https connections. This is a compulsory step (at least it should be performed by default) in https and in http/2. I would add it to any TLS client protocol. A flaw was found in undertow. The undertow client is not checking the server identity the server certificate presents in HTTPS connections. • https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-4492 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2153260 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230324-0002 • CWE-550: Server-generated Error Message Containing Sensitive Information •