CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2023-4956 – Quay: clickjacking on config-editor page severity
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-4956
A flaw was found in Quay. Clickjacking is when an attacker uses multiple transparent or opaque layers to trick a user into clicking on a button or link on another page when they intend to click on the top-level page. During the pentest, it has been detected that the config-editor page is vulnerable to clickjacking. This flaw allows an attacker to trick an administrator user into clicking on buttons on the config-editor panel, possibly reconfiguring some parts of the Quay instance. Se encontró una falla en Quay. • https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-4956 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238886 • CWE-1021: Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 83%CPEs: 444EXPL: 7CVE-2023-44487 – HTTP/2 Rapid Reset Attack Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-44487
The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023. El protocolo HTTP/2 permite una denegación de servicio (consumo de recursos del servidor) porque la cancelación de solicitudes puede restablecer muchas transmisiones rápidamente, como se explotó en la naturaleza entre agosto y octubre de 2023. A flaw was found in handling multiplexed streams in the HTTP/2 protocol. A client can repeatedly make a request for a new multiplex stream and immediately send an RST_STREAM frame to cancel it. This creates extra work for the server setting up and tearing down the streams while not hitting any server-side limit for the maximum number of active streams per connection, resulting in a denial of service due to server resource consumption. • https://github.com/imabee101/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/studiogangster/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/bcdannyboy/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/sigridou/CVE-2023-44487- https://github.com/ByteHackr/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/ReToCode/golang-CVE-2023-44487 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/13/4 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/13/9 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/18/4 http://www. • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2023-4959 – Quay: cross-site request forgery (csrf) on config-editor page
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-4959
A flaw was found in Quay. Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks force a user to perform unwanted actions in an application. During the pentest, it was detected that the config-editor page is vulnerable to CSRF. The config-editor page is used to configure the Quay instance. By coercing the victim’s browser into sending an attacker-controlled request from another domain, it is possible to reconfigure the Quay instance (including adding users with admin privileges). • https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-4959 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238908 • CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) •
CVSS: 5.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2023-3384 – Quay: stored cross site scripting
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-3384
A flaw was found in the Quay registry. While the image labels created through Quay undergo validation both in the UI and backend by applying a regex (validation.py), the same validation is not performed when the label comes from an image. This flaw allows an attacker to publish a malicious image to a public registry containing a script that can be executed via Cross-site scripting (XSS). • https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-3384 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2216924 • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 23EXPL: 0CVE-2020-10735 – python: int() type in PyLong_FromString() does not limit amount of digits converting text to int leading to DoS
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-10735
A flaw was found in python. In algorithms with quadratic time complexity using non-binary bases, when using int("text"), a system could take 50ms to parse an int string with 100,000 digits and 5s for 1,000,000 digits (float, decimal, int.from_bytes(), and int() for binary bases 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 are not affected). The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability. Se ha encontrado un fallo en python. En los algoritmos con complejidad de tiempo cuadrática que usan bases no binarias, cuando es usada int("text"), un sistema podría tardar 50ms en analizar una cadena int con 100.000 dígitos y 5s para 1.000.000 de dígitos (float, decimal, int.from_bytes(), e int() para bases binarias 2, 4, 8, 16, y 32 no están afectados). • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/09/21/1 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/09/21/4 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-10735 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834423 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KjuF_aXlzPUxTK4BMgezGJ2Pn7uevfX7g0_mvgHlL7Y https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/95778 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/06/msg00039.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fed • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-704: Incorrect Type Conversion or Cast •