CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 1CVE-2023-51765
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-51765
sendmail through 8.17.2 allows SMTP smuggling in certain configurations. Remote attackers can use a published exploitation technique to inject e-mail messages with a spoofed MAIL FROM address, allowing bypass of an SPF protection mechanism. This occurs because sendmail supports <LF>.<CR><LF> but some other popular e-mail servers do not. This is resolved in 8.18 and later versions with 'o' in srv_features. sendmail hasta al menos 8.14.7 permite el contrabando SMTP en ciertas configuraciones. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/12/24/1 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/12/25/1 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/12/26/5 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/12/29/5 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/12/30/1 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/12/30/3 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-51765 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255869 ht • CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity •
CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0CVE-2021-3618
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-3618
ALPACA is an application layer protocol content confusion attack, exploiting TLS servers implementing different protocols but using compatible certificates, such as multi-domain or wildcard certificates. A MiTM attacker having access to victim's traffic at the TCP/IP layer can redirect traffic from one subdomain to another, resulting in a valid TLS session. This breaks the authentication of TLS and cross-protocol attacks may be possible where the behavior of one protocol service may compromise the other at the application layer. ALPACA es un ataque de confusión de contenido de protocolo de capa de aplicación, que explota servidores TLS que implementan diferentes protocolos pero que usan certificados compatibles, como certificados multidominio o comodín. Un atacante de tipo MiTM que tenga acceso al tráfico de la víctima en la capa TCP/IP puede redirigir el tráfico de un subdominio a otro, resultando en a una sesión TLS válida. • https://alpaca-attack.com https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1975623 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/11/msg00031.html • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation •
CVSS: 1.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 56EXPL: 0CVE-2014-3956
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-3956
The sm_close_on_exec function in conf.c in sendmail before 8.14.9 has arguments in the wrong order, and consequently skips setting expected FD_CLOEXEC flags, which allows local users to access unintended high-numbered file descriptors via a custom mail-delivery program. La función sm_close_on_exec en conf.c en sendmail anterior a 8.14.9 tiene argumentos en el orden erróneo, y como consecuencia evade configurar etiquetas FD_CLOEXEC esperadas, lo que permite a usuarios locales acceder a descriptores de archivos de número alto no intencionados a través de un programa de entrega de correo personalizado. • ftp://ftp.sendmail.org/pub/sendmail/RELEASE_NOTES http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2014-0270.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-June/134349.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2014-06/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2014-06/msg00033.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/126975/Slackware-Security-Advisory-sendmail-Updates.html http://secunia.com/advisories/57455 http://secunia.com/advisories/58628 http://security.gentoo.org&#x • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 62EXPL: 0CVE-2009-4565 – sendmail: incorrect verification of SSL certificate with NUL in name
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2009-4565
sendmail before 8.14.4 does not properly handle a '\0' character in a Common Name (CN) field of an X.509 certificate, which (1) allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof arbitrary SSL-based SMTP servers via a crafted server certificate issued by a legitimate Certification Authority, and (2) allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via a crafted client certificate issued by a legitimate Certification Authority, a related issue to CVE-2009-2408. sendmail anterior a v8.14.4 no maneja adecuadamente un carácter '\0' en un fichero Common Name (CN) de un certificado X.509; esto permite (1) a atacantes del tipo hombre-en-el-medio suplantar a su elección servidores SMTP basados en SSL utilizando un certificado de servidor manipulado expedido por una Autoridad Certificadora legítima y (2) a atacantes remotos evitar las restricciones de acceso pretendidas a través de un certificado cliente expedido por una Autoridad Certificadora legítima. Vulnerabilidad relacionada con CVE-2009-2408. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-03/msg00004.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=126953289726317&w=2 http://secunia.com/advisories/37998 http://secunia.com/advisories/38314 http://secunia.com/advisories/38915 http://secunia.com/advisories/39088 http://secunia.com/advisories/40109 http://secunia.com/advisories/43366 http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201206-30.xml http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-77-1021797.1-1 http://www • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 8%CPEs: 60EXPL: 1CVE-2009-1490 – Sendmail 8.12.x - 'X-header' Remote Heap Buffer Overflow (PoC)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2009-1490
Heap-based buffer overflow in Sendmail before 8.13.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a long X- header, as demonstrated by an X-Testing header. Desbordamiento de búfer basado en montículo en Sendmail anterior a v8.13.2 permite a atacantes remotos producir una denegación de servicio (caída de demonio) y posiblemente ejecutar código de forma arbitraria a través de la cabecera X- como se demostró mediante la cabecera de prueba X-. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/32995 http://www.nmrc.org/~thegnome/blog/apr09 http://www.sendmail.org/releases/8.13.2 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/50355 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •