CVSS: 5.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 12EXPL: 0CVE-2021-37186
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-37186
A vulnerability has been identified in LOGO! CMR2020 (All versions < V2.2), LOGO! CMR2040 (All versions < V2.2), SIMATIC RTU3010C (All versions < V4.0.9), SIMATIC RTU3030C (All versions < V4.0.9), SIMATIC RTU3031C (All versions < V4.0.9), SIMATIC RTU3041C (All versions < V4.0.9). The underlying TCP/IP stack does not properly calculate the random numbers used as ISN (Initial Sequence Numbers). An adjacent attacker with network access to the LAN interface could interfere with traffic, spoof the connection and gain access to sensitive information. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-316383.pdf • CWE-330: Use of Insufficiently Random Values •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 17EXPL: 0CVE-2020-36475
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-36475
An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS before 2.25.0 (and before 2.16.9 LTS and before 2.7.18 LTS). The calculations performed by mbedtls_mpi_exp_mod are not limited; thus, supplying overly large parameters could lead to denial of service when generating Diffie-Hellman key pairs. Se ha detectado un problema en Mbed TLS versiones anteriores a 2.25.0 (y versiones anteriores a 2.16.9 LTS y versiones anteriores a 2.7.18 LTS). Los cálculos llevado a cabo por la función mbedtls_mpi_exp_mod no están limitados; por lo tanto, el suministro de parámetros demasiado grandes podría conllevar a una denegación de servicio cuando se generan pares de claves Diffie-Hellman. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-756638.pdf https://github.com/ARMmbed/mbedtls/releases/tag/v2.16.9 https://github.com/ARMmbed/mbedtls/releases/tag/v2.25.0 https://github.com/ARMmbed/mbedtls/releases/tag/v2.7.18 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/11/msg00021.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/12/msg00036.html • CWE-131: Incorrect Calculation of Buffer Size •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 17EXPL: 1CVE-2020-36478
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-36478
An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS before 2.25.0 (and before 2.16.9 LTS and before 2.7.18 LTS). A NULL algorithm parameters entry looks identical to an array of REAL (size zero) and thus the certificate is considered valid. However, if the parameters do not match in any way, then the certificate should be considered invalid. Se ha detectado un problema en Mbed TLS versiones anteriores a 2.25.0 (y versiones anteriores a 2.16.9 LTS y versiones anteriores a 2.7.18 LTS). Una entrada de parámetros de algoritmo NULL parece idéntica a una matriz de REAL (tamaño cero) y, por tanto, el certificado es considerado válido. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-756638.pdf https://github.com/ARMmbed/mbedtls/issues/3629 https://github.com/ARMmbed/mbedtls/releases/tag/v2.16.9 https://github.com/ARMmbed/mbedtls/releases/tag/v2.25.0 https://github.com/ARMmbed/mbedtls/releases/tag/v2.7.18 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/11/msg00021.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/12/msg00036.html • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation •
CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 60EXPL: 1CVE-2021-22924 – curl: Bad connection reuse due to flawed path name checks
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-22924
libcurl keeps previously used connections in a connection pool for subsequenttransfers to reuse, if one of them matches the setup.Due to errors in the logic, the config matching function did not take 'issuercert' into account and it compared the involved paths *case insensitively*,which could lead to libcurl reusing wrong connections.File paths are, or can be, case sensitive on many systems but not all, and caneven vary depending on used file systems.The comparison also didn't include the 'issuer cert' which a transfer can setto qualify how to verify the server certificate. libcurl mantiene las conexiones usadas previamente en un pool de conexiones para reusarlas en posteriores transferencias, si una de ellas coincide con la configuración. Debido a errores en la lógica, la función de coincidencia de la configuración no tenía en cuenta "issuercert" y comparaba las rutas implicadas *sin tener en cuenta el caso*, que podía conllevar a que libcurl reusara conexiones erróneas. Las rutas de los archivos son, o pueden ser, casos confidenciales en muchos sistemas, pero no en todos, y pueden incluso variar dependiendo de los sistemas de archivos usados. La comparación tampoco incluía el "issuercert" que una transferencia puede ajustar para calificar cómo verificar el certificado del servidor A flaw was found in libcurl in the way libcurl handles previously used connections without accounting for 'issuer cert' and comparing the involved paths case-insensitively. This flaw allows libcurl to use the wrong connection. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-484086.pdf https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-732250.pdf https://hackerone.com/reports/1223565 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r61db8e7dcb56dc000a5387a88f7a473bacec5ee01b9ff3f55308aacc%40%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r61db8e7dcb56dc000a5387a88f7a473bacec5ee01b9ff3f55308aacc%40%3Cusers.kafka.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbf4ce74b0d1fa9810dec50ba3ace0c • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation CWE-706: Use of Incorrectly-Resolved Name or Reference •