9 results (0.014 seconds)

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 8%CPEs: 50EXPL: 0

The in-memory certificate cache in strongSwan before 5.9.4 has a remote integer overflow upon receiving many requests with different certificates to fill the cache and later trigger the replacement of cache entries. The code attempts to select a less-often-used cache entry by means of a random number generator, but this is not done correctly. Remote code execution might be a slight possibility. La caché de certificados en memoria en strongSwan versiones anteriores a 5.9.4, presenta un desbordamiento de enteros remoto al recibir muchas peticiones con diferentes certificados para llenar la caché y posteriormente desencadenar la sustitución de las entradas de la caché. El código intenta seleccionar una entrada de caché menos usada mediante un generador de números aleatorios, pero esto no es realizado correctamente. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-539476.pdf https://github.com/strongswan/strongswan/releases/tag/5.9.4 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/10/msg00014.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5FJSATD2R2XHTG4P63GCMQ2N7EWKMME5 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WQSQ3BEC22NF4NCDZVCT4P3Q2ZIAJXGJ https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/mes • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •

CVSS: 9.0EPSS: 96%CPEs: 26EXPL: 8

A crafted request uri-path can cause mod_proxy to forward the request to an origin server choosen by the remote user. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 and earlier. Un uri-path diseñado puede causar que mod_proxy reenvíe la petición a un servidor de origen elegido por el usuario remoto. Este problema afecta a Apache HTTP Server versiones 2.4.48 y anteriores A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) flaw was found in mod_proxy of httpd. This flaw allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to make the httpd server forward requests to an arbitrary server. • https://github.com/sixpacksecurity/CVE-2021-40438 https://github.com/xiaojiangxl/CVE-2021-40438 https://github.com/Kashkovsky/CVE-2021-40438 https://github.com/sergiovks/CVE-2021-40438-Apache-2.4.48-SSRF-exploit https://github.com/BabyTeam1024/CVE-2021-40438 https://github.com/gassara-kys/CVE-2021-40438 https://github.com/Cappricio-Securities/CVE-2021-40438 https://github.com/pisut4152/Sigma-Rule-for-CVE-2021-40438-exploitation-attempt https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ • CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 25EXPL: 0

Malformed requests may cause the server to dereference a NULL pointer. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 and earlier. Unas peticiones malformadas pueden causar que el servidor haga desreferencia a un puntero NULL. Este problema afecta a Apache HTTP Server versiones 2.4.48 y anteriores A NULL pointer dereference in httpd allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash httpd by providing malformed HTTP requests. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability. • http://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-685781.pdf https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10379 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r3925e167d5eb1c75def3750c155d753064e1d34a143028bb32910432%40%3Cusers.httpd.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r61fdbfc26ab170f4e6492ef3bd5197c20b862ce156e9d5a54d4b899c%40%3Cusers.httpd.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r82838efc5fa6fc4c73986399c9b71573589f78b31846aff5bd9b1697%40%3Cusers.httpd.apache.org%3E • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •

CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 60EXPL: 1

libcurl keeps previously used connections in a connection pool for subsequenttransfers to reuse, if one of them matches the setup.Due to errors in the logic, the config matching function did not take 'issuercert' into account and it compared the involved paths *case insensitively*,which could lead to libcurl reusing wrong connections.File paths are, or can be, case sensitive on many systems but not all, and caneven vary depending on used file systems.The comparison also didn't include the 'issuer cert' which a transfer can setto qualify how to verify the server certificate. libcurl mantiene las conexiones usadas previamente en un pool de conexiones para reusarlas en posteriores transferencias, si una de ellas coincide con la configuración. Debido a errores en la lógica, la función de coincidencia de la configuración no tenía en cuenta "issuercert" y comparaba las rutas implicadas *sin tener en cuenta el caso*, que podía conllevar a que libcurl reusara conexiones erróneas. Las rutas de los archivos son, o pueden ser, casos confidenciales en muchos sistemas, pero no en todos, y pueden incluso variar dependiendo de los sistemas de archivos usados. La comparación tampoco incluía el "issuercert" que una transferencia puede ajustar para calificar cómo verificar el certificado del servidor A flaw was found in libcurl in the way libcurl handles previously used connections without accounting for 'issuer cert' and comparing the involved paths case-insensitively. This flaw allows libcurl to use the wrong connection. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-484086.pdf https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-732250.pdf https://hackerone.com/reports/1223565 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r61db8e7dcb56dc000a5387a88f7a473bacec5ee01b9ff3f55308aacc%40%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r61db8e7dcb56dc000a5387a88f7a473bacec5ee01b9ff3f55308aacc%40%3Cusers.kafka.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbf4ce74b0d1fa9810dec50ba3ace0c • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation CWE-706: Use of Incorrectly-Resolved Name or Reference •

CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 45EXPL: 1

curl supports the `-t` command line option, known as `CURLOPT_TELNETOPTIONS`in libcurl. This rarely used option is used to send variable=content pairs toTELNET servers.Due to flaw in the option parser for sending `NEW_ENV` variables, libcurlcould be made to pass on uninitialized data from a stack based buffer to theserver. Therefore potentially revealing sensitive internal information to theserver using a clear-text network protocol.This could happen because curl did not call and use sscanf() correctly whenparsing the string provided by the application. curl soporta la opción de línea de comandos "-t", conocida como "CURLOPT_TELNETOPTIONS" en libcurl. Debido a un fallo en el analizador de opciones para el envío de variables "NEW_ENV", libcurl podría pasar datos no inicializados de un búfer en la región stack de la memoria al servidor. Por lo tanto, podría revelar potencialmente información interna confidencial al servidor usando un protocolo de red de texto sin cifrar. • http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Sep/39 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Sep/40 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-484086.pdf https://hackerone.com/reports/1223882 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/FRUCW2UVNYUDZF72DQLFQR4PJEC6CF7V https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202212-01 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210902-0003 https://support.apple& • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-908: Use of Uninitialized Resource •