CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 12%CPEs: 35EXPL: 0CVE-2007-4787
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2007-4787
The virus detection engine in Sophos Anti-Virus before 2.49.0 does not properly process malformed (1) CAB, (2) LZH, and (3) RAR files with modified headers, which might allow remote attackers to bypass malware detection. El motor de detección de virus en Sophos Anti-Virus anterior a 2.49.0 no procesa adecuadamente los archivos malformados (1) CAB, (2) LZH, y (3) RAR con cabeceras modificadas, lo cual podría permitir a atacantes remotos evitar la detección de código malicioso. • http://osvdb.org/37988 http://secunia.com/advisories/26726 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/25574 http://www.sophos.com/support/knowledgebase/article/29146.html http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/3078 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/36502 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 12%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2006-6335 – Sophos Anti-Virus SIT Archive Parsing Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2006-6335
Multiple buffer overflows in Sophos Anti-Virus scanning engine before 2.40 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a SIT archive with a long filename that is not null-terminated, which triggers a heap-based overflow in veex.dll due to improper length calculation, and (2) a CPIO archive, with a long filename that is not null-terminated, which triggers a stack-based overflow in veex.dll. Múltiples desbordamientos de búfer en el motor de escaneo Sophos Anti-Virus en versiones anteriores a la 2.40 permiten a atacantes remotos ejecutar código de su elección a través de (1) un archivo SIT con nombre de fichero largo que no termina en nulo, que dispara un desbordamiento basado en pila en el veex.dll debido a un cálculo de longitud inapropiada y (2) archivo CPIO, con un nombre de fichero largo que no termina en nulo, que dispara un desbordamiento basado en pila en el veex.dll. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Sophos Anti-Virus. The specific flaw exists in the parsing of SIT archives. When a long non-null terminated filename is processed by veex.dll, a heap overflow occurs due to the miscalculation of the string's actual size. Exploitation is possible leading to remote code execution running under the SYSTEM context. • http://secunia.com/advisories/23325 http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/454197/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/454211/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/21563 http://www.sophos.com/support/knowledgebase/article/17340.html http://www.sophos.com/support/knowledgebase/article/21637.html http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/4919 http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-06-045.html http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-06-04 •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 93%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2006-0994 – Sophos Anti-Virus CAB Unpacking Code Execution Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2006-0994
Multiple Sophos Anti-Virus products, including Anti-Virus for Windows 5.x before 5.2.1 and 4.x before 4.05, when cabinet file inspection is enabled, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a CAB file with "invalid folder count values," which leads to heap corruption. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Sophos AntiVirus. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the unpacking of Microsoft Cabinet files that contain invalid folder count values within the CAB header. Parsing of a specially crafted cabinet file can lead to an exploitable heap corruption. This vulnerability is only exposed when cabinet file inspection is explicitly enabled. • http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2006-May/045897.html http://secunia.com/advisories/20028 http://securityreason.com/securityalert/869 http://securitytracker.com/id?1016041 http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/433272/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17876 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1730 http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-06-012.html https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/26305 •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0CVE-2005-4680
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2005-4680
Sophos Anti-Virus before 4.02, 4.5.x before 4.5.9, 4.6.x before 4.6.9, and 5.x before 5.1.4 allow remote attackers to hide arbitrary files and data via crafted ARJ archives, which are not properly scanned. • http://www.sophos.com/support/knowledgebase/article/3803.html http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/0347 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/24345 •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 1%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2005-3382
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2005-3382
Multiple interpretation error in Sophos 3.91 with the 2.28.4 engine allows remote attackers to bypass virus scanning via a file such as BAT, HTML, and EML with an "MZ" magic byte sequence which is normally associated with EXE, which causes the file to be treated as a safe type that could still be executed as a dangerous file type by applications on the end system, as demonstrated by a "triple headed" program that contains EXE, EML, and HTML content, aka the "magic byte bug." • http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=113026417802703&w=2 http://www.securityelf.org/magicbyte.html http://www.securityelf.org/magicbyteadv.html http://www.securityelf.org/updmagic.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/15189 •