![](/assets/img/cve_300x82_sin_bg.png)
CVE-2022-22978 – springframework: Authorization Bypass in RegexRequestMatcher
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-22978
19 May 2022 — In spring security versions prior to 5.4.11+, 5.5.7+ , 5.6.4+ and older unsupported versions, RegexRequestMatcher can easily be misconfigured to be bypassed on some servlet containers. Applications using RegexRequestMatcher with `.` in the regular expression are possibly vulnerable to an authorization bypass. En las versiones 5.5.6 y 5.6.3 de Spring Security y en versiones anteriores no soportadas, RegexRequestMatcher puede ser fácilmente configurado de forma incorrecta para ser evitado en algunos contenedo... • https://github.com/DeEpinGh0st/CVE-2022-22978 • CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization CWE-1220: Insufficient Granularity of Access Control •
![](/assets/img/cve_300x82_sin_bg.png)
CVE-2021-22112
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-22112
23 Feb 2021 — Spring Security 5.4.x prior to 5.4.4, 5.3.x prior to 5.3.8.RELEASE, 5.2.x prior to 5.2.9.RELEASE, and older unsupported versions can fail to save the SecurityContext if it is changed more than once in a single request.A malicious user cannot cause the bug to happen (it must be programmed in). However, if the application's intent is to only allow the user to run with elevated privileges in a small portion of the application, the bug can be leveraged to extend those privileges to the rest of the application. ... • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/02/19/7 •
![](/assets/img/cve_300x82_sin_bg.png)
CVE-2014-3527
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-3527
25 May 2017 — When using the CAS Proxy ticket authentication from Spring Security 3.1 to 3.2.4 a malicious CAS Service could trick another CAS Service into authenticating a proxy ticket that was not associated. This is due to the fact that the proxy ticket authentication uses the information from the HttpServletRequest which is populated based upon untrusted information within the HTTP request. This means if there are access control restrictions on which CAS services can authenticate to one another, those restrictions ca... • https://pivotal.io/security/cve-2014-3527 • CWE-287: Improper Authentication •
![](/assets/img/cve_300x82_sin_bg.png)
CVE-2016-5007
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-5007
25 May 2017 — Both Spring Security 3.2.x, 4.0.x, 4.1.0 and the Spring Framework 3.2.x, 4.0.x, 4.1.x, 4.2.x rely on URL pattern mappings for authorization and for mapping requests to controllers respectively. Differences in the strictness of the pattern matching mechanisms, for example with regards to space trimming in path segments, can lead Spring Security to not recognize certain paths as not protected that are in fact mapped to Spring MVC controllers that should be protected. The problem is compounded by the fact that... • http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2018-3678067.html • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls •
![](/assets/img/cve_300x82_sin_bg.png)
CVE-2016-9879 – Security: Improper handling of path parameters allows bypassing the security constraint
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-9879
06 Jan 2017 — An issue was discovered in Pivotal Spring Security before 3.2.10, 4.1.x before 4.1.4, and 4.2.x before 4.2.1. Spring Security does not consider URL path parameters when processing security constraints. By adding a URL path parameter with an encoded "/" to a request, an attacker may be able to bypass a security constraint. The root cause of this issue is a lack of clarity regarding the handling of path parameters in the Servlet Specification. Some Servlet containers include path parameters in the value retur... • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95142 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-417: Communication Channel Errors •