10 results (0.024 seconds)

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 8EXPL: 2

In PuTTY 0.68 through 0.80 before 0.81, biased ECDSA nonce generation allows an attacker to recover a user's NIST P-521 secret key via a quick attack in approximately 60 signatures. This is especially important in a scenario where an adversary is able to read messages signed by PuTTY or Pageant. The required set of signed messages may be publicly readable because they are stored in a public Git service that supports use of SSH for commit signing, and the signatures were made by Pageant through an agent-forwarding mechanism. In other words, an adversary may already have enough signature information to compromise a victim's private key, even if there is no further use of vulnerable PuTTY versions. After a key compromise, an adversary may be able to conduct supply-chain attacks on software maintained in Git. • https://github.com/sh1k4ku/CVE-2024-31497 https://github.com/HugoBond/CVE-2024-31497-POC http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/04/15/6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275183 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222864 https://docs.ccv.brown.edu/oscar/connecting-to-oscar/ssh/ssh-agent-forwarding/key-generation-and-agent-forwarding-with-putty https://filezilla-project.org/versions.php https://git.tartarus.org/?h=c193fe9848f50a88a4089aac647fecc31ae96d27&p=sim • CWE-338: Use of Cryptographically Weak Pseudo-Random Number Generator (PRNG) •

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 96%CPEs: 79EXPL: 1

The SSH transport protocol with certain OpenSSH extensions, found in OpenSSH before 9.6 and other products, allows remote attackers to bypass integrity checks such that some packets are omitted (from the extension negotiation message), and a client and server may consequently end up with a connection for which some security features have been downgraded or disabled, aka a Terrapin attack. This occurs because the SSH Binary Packet Protocol (BPP), implemented by these extensions, mishandles the handshake phase and mishandles use of sequence numbers. For example, there is an effective attack against SSH's use of ChaCha20-Poly1305 (and CBC with Encrypt-then-MAC). The bypass occurs in chacha20-poly1305@openssh.com and (if CBC is used) the -etm@openssh.com MAC algorithms. This also affects Maverick Synergy Java SSH API before 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT, Dropbear through 2022.83, Ssh before 5.1.1 in Erlang/OTP, PuTTY before 0.80, AsyncSSH before 2.14.2, golang.org/x/crypto before 0.17.0, libssh before 0.10.6, libssh2 through 1.11.0, Thorn Tech SFTP Gateway before 3.4.6, Tera Term before 5.1, Paramiko before 3.4.0, jsch before 0.2.15, SFTPGo before 2.5.6, Netgate pfSense Plus through 23.09.1, Netgate pfSense CE through 2.7.2, HPN-SSH through 18.2.0, ProFTPD before 1.3.8b (and before 1.3.9rc2), ORYX CycloneSSH before 2.3.4, NetSarang XShell 7 before Build 0144, CrushFTP before 10.6.0, ConnectBot SSH library before 2.2.22, Apache MINA sshd through 2.11.0, sshj through 0.37.0, TinySSH through 20230101, trilead-ssh2 6401, LANCOM LCOS and LANconfig, FileZilla before 3.66.4, Nova before 11.8, PKIX-SSH before 14.4, SecureCRT before 9.4.3, Transmit5 before 5.10.4, Win32-OpenSSH before 9.5.0.0p1-Beta, WinSCP before 6.2.2, Bitvise SSH Server before 9.32, Bitvise SSH Client before 9.33, KiTTY through 0.76.1.13, the net-ssh gem 7.2.0 for Ruby, the mscdex ssh2 module before 1.15.0 for Node.js, the thrussh library before 0.35.1 for Rust, and the Russh crate before 0.40.2 for Rust. • http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/176280/Terrapin-SSH-Connection-Weakening.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2024/Mar/21 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/12/18/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/12/19/5 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/12/20/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/03/06/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/04/17/8 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2023-48 • CWE-222: Truncation of Security-relevant Information CWE-354: Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value •

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

WinSCP before 5.17.10 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary programs when the URL handler encounters a crafted URL that loads session settings. (For example, this is exploitable in a default installation in which WinSCP is the handler for sftp:// URLs.) WinSCP anterior a la versión 5.17.10 permite a los atacantes remotos ejecutar programas arbitrarios cuando el manejador de URLs encuentra una URL manipulada que carga la configuración de la sesión. (Por ejemplo, esto es explotable en una instalación por defecto en la que WinSCP es el manejador de URLs sftp://) • https://github.com/winscp/winscp/commit/faa96e8144e6925a380f94a97aa382c9427f688d https://winscp.net/eng/docs/history#5.17.10 https://winscp.net/eng/docs/rawsettings https://winscp.net/tracker/1943 •

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 55EXPL: 3

An issue was discovered in OpenSSH 7.9. Due to the scp implementation being derived from 1983 rcp, the server chooses which files/directories are sent to the client. However, the scp client only performs cursory validation of the object name returned (only directory traversal attacks are prevented). A malicious scp server (or Man-in-The-Middle attacker) can overwrite arbitrary files in the scp client target directory. If recursive operation (-r) is performed, the server can manipulate subdirectories as well (for example, to overwrite the .ssh/authorized_keys file). • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/46516 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/46193 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00058.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/04/18/1 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/08/02/1 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106741 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3702 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677794 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-412672&# • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') •

CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 51EXPL: 0

An issue was discovered in OpenSSH 7.9. Due to missing character encoding in the progress display, a malicious server (or Man-in-The-Middle attacker) can employ crafted object names to manipulate the client output, e.g., by using ANSI control codes to hide additional files being transferred. This affects refresh_progress_meter() in progressmeter.c. Se ha descubierto un problema en OpenSSH 7.9. Debido a la falta de cifrado de caracteres en la pantalla de progreso, un servidor malicioso (o atacante Man-in-the-Middle) puede emplear nombres de objeto manipulados para manipular la salida del cliente, por ejemplo, empleando códigos de control de ANSI para ocultar los archivos adicionales que se están transfiriendo. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00058.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3702 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-412672.pdf https://cvsweb.openbsd.org/src/usr.bin/ssh/progressmeter.c https://cvsweb.openbsd.org/src/usr.bin/ssh/scp.c https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/03/msg00030.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/W3YVQ2BPTOVDCFDVNC2GGF5P5ISFG37G https:// • CWE-116: Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output CWE-451: User Interface (UI) Misrepresentation of Critical Information •