CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 97%CPEs: 91EXPL: 0CVE-2019-11477 – Integer overflow in TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_gso_segs
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-11477
Jonathan Looney discovered that the TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_gso_segs value was subject to an integer overflow in the Linux kernel when handling TCP Selective Acknowledgments (SACKs). A remote attacker could use this to cause a denial of service. This has been fixed in stable kernel releases 4.4.182, 4.9.182, 4.14.127, 4.19.52, 5.1.11, and is fixed in commit 3b4929f65b0d8249f19a50245cd88ed1a2f78cff. Jonathan Looney detectó que el valor TCP_SKB_CB(skb)-mayor que tcp_gso_segs estuvo sujeto a un desbordamiento de enteros en el kernel de Linux durante el manejo del Reconocimiento Selectivo (SACK) de TCP. Un atacante remoto podría usar esto para causar una denegación de servicio. • http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153346/Kernel-Live-Patch-Security-Notice-LSN-0052-1.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/154951/Kernel-Live-Patch-Security-Notice-LSN-0058-1.html http://www.arubanetworks.com/assets/alert/ARUBA-PSA-2020-010.txt http://www.huawei.com/en/psirt/security-advisories/huawei-sa-20191225-01-kernel-en http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/06/20/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/06/28/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss&# • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 96%CPEs: 90EXPL: 0CVE-2019-11478 – SACK can cause extensive memory use via fragmented resend queue
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-11478
Jonathan Looney discovered that the TCP retransmission queue implementation in tcp_fragment in the Linux kernel could be fragmented when handling certain TCP Selective Acknowledgment (SACK) sequences. A remote attacker could use this to cause a denial of service. This has been fixed in stable kernel releases 4.4.182, 4.9.182, 4.14.127, 4.19.52, 5.1.11, and is fixed in commit f070ef2ac66716357066b683fb0baf55f8191a2e. Jonathan Looney descubrió que la implementación de la cola de retransmisión de TCP en tcp_fragment en el kernel de Linux podría estar fragmentada cuando se manejan ciertas secuencias de Reconocimiento Selectivo (SACK) de TCP. Un atacante remoto podría usar esto para causar una denegación de servicio. • http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153346/Kernel-Live-Patch-Security-Notice-LSN-0052-1.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/154408/Kernel-Live-Patch-Security-Notice-LSN-0055-1.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/154951/Kernel-Live-Patch-Security-Notice-LSN-0058-1.html http://www.arubanetworks.com/assets/alert/ARUBA-PSA-2020-010.txt http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/06/28/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/06/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists& • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 97%CPEs: 96EXPL: 0CVE-2019-11479 – kernel: tcp: excessive resource consumption for TCP connections with low MSS allows remote denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-11479
Jonathan Looney discovered that the Linux kernel default MSS is hard-coded to 48 bytes. This allows a remote peer to fragment TCP resend queues significantly more than if a larger MSS were enforced. A remote attacker could use this to cause a denial of service. This has been fixed in stable kernel releases 4.4.182, 4.9.182, 4.14.127, 4.19.52, 5.1.11, and is fixed in commits 967c05aee439e6e5d7d805e195b3a20ef5c433d6 and 5f3e2bf008c2221478101ee72f5cb4654b9fc363. Jonathan Looney descubrió que el tamaño máximo de segmento (MSS) por defecto del kernel de Linux está codificado a 48 bytes. • http://www.arubanetworks.com/assets/alert/ARUBA-PSA-2020-010.txt http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/06/28/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/06/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/06/4 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/108818 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1594 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1602 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1699 https://access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabili • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-405: Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification) CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 4.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 65EXPL: 0CVE-2019-6618
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-6618
On BIG-IP 14.0.0-14.1.0.1, 13.0.0-13.1.1.4, 12.1.0-12.1.4, 11.6.1-11.6.3.4, and 11.5.2-11.5.8, users with the Resource Administrator role can modify sensitive portions of the filesystem if provided Advanced Shell Access, such as editing /etc/passwd. This allows modifications to user objects and is contrary to our definition for the Resource Administrator (RA) role restrictions. En BIG-IP versiones desde la 14.0.0.0 hasta la 14.1.0.1, desde la 13.0.0 hasta la 13.1.1.1.4, desde la 12.1.0 hasta la 12.1.4, desde la 11.6.1 hasta la 11.6.3.4, y desde la 11.5.2 hasta la 11.5.8, los usuarios con el rol Resource Administrator (Administrador de Recursos) pueden modificar partes sensibles del sistema de archivos si se les proporciona acceso avanzado a la Consola, como por ejemplo, editar /etc/passwd. Esto permite modificar los objetos de usuario y es contrario a nuestra definición de las restricciones de función del Resource Administrator (RA). • https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K07702240 •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 65EXPL: 0CVE-2019-6617
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-6617
On BIG-IP 14.0.0-14.1.0.1, 13.0.0-13.1.1.4, 12.1.0-12.1.4, 11.6.1-11.6.3.4, and 11.5.2-11.5.8, a user with the Resource Administrator role is able to overwrite sensitive low-level files (such as /etc/passwd) using SFTP to modify user permissions, without Advanced Shell access. This is contrary to our definition for the Resource Administrator (RA) role restrictions. En BIG-IP 14.0.0-14.1.0.1, 13.0.0-13.1.1.4, 12.1.0-12.1.4, 11.6.1-11.6.3.4, y 11.5.2-11.5.8, un usuario con el rol de " Resource Administrator" esta capacitado para sobrescribir archivos sensibles de bajo nivel (como /etc/passwd) empleando SFTP para modificar los permisos de usuarios, sin el acceso a una Shell Avanzada. Esto es opuesto a nuestras restricciones de rol para el "Resource Administrator" (RA). • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/108186 https://github.com/mirchr/security-research/blob/master/vulnerabilities/F5/CVE-2019-6617.txt https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K38941195 • CWE-269: Improper Privilege Management •