CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2018-5741 – Update policies krb5-subdomain and ms-subdomain do not enforce controls promised in their documentation
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-5741
To provide fine-grained controls over the ability to use Dynamic DNS (DDNS) to update records in a zone, BIND 9 provides a feature called update-policy. Various rules can be configured to limit the types of updates that can be performed by a client, depending on the key used when sending the update request. Unfortunately, some rule types were not initially documented, and when documentation for them was added to the Administrator Reference Manual (ARM) in change #3112, the language that was added to the ARM at that time incorrectly described the behavior of two rule types, krb5-subdomain and ms-subdomain. This incorrect documentation could mislead operators into believing that policies they had configured were more restrictive than they actually were. This affects BIND versions prior to BIND 9.11.5 and BIND 9.12.3. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00041.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00044.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105379 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041674 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2057 https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2018-5741 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201903-13 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190830-0001 https://support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&doc • CWE-284: Improper Access Control CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0CVE-2018-5737 – BIND 9.12's serve-stale implementation can cause an assertion failure in rbtdb.c or other undesirable behavior, even if serve-stale is not enabled.
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-5737
A problem with the implementation of the new serve-stale feature in BIND 9.12 can lead to an assertion failure in rbtdb.c, even when stale-answer-enable is off. Additionally, problematic interaction between the serve-stale feature and NSEC aggressive negative caching can in some cases cause undesirable behavior from named, such as a recursion loop or excessive logging. Deliberate exploitation of this condition could cause operational problems depending on the particular manifestation -- either degradation or denial of service. Affects BIND 9.12.0 and 9.12.1. Un problema con la implementación de la nueva característica "serve-stale" en BIND 9.12 puede conducir a un fallo de aserción en rbtdb.c, incluso cuando stale-answer-enable está desactivado. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104236 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040942 https://kb.isc.org/docs/aa-01606 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180926-0004 • CWE-617: Reachable Assertion •
CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0CVE-2018-5736
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-5736
An error in zone database reference counting can lead to an assertion failure if a server which is running an affected version of BIND attempts several transfers of a slave zone in quick succession. This defect could be deliberately exercised by an attacker who is permitted to cause a vulnerable server to initiate zone transfers (for example: by sending valid NOTIFY messages), causing the named process to exit after failing the assertion test. Affects BIND 9.12.0 and 9.12.1. Un error en el conteo de la base de datos de la zona puede conducir a un fallo de aserción si un servidor que está ejecutando una versión afectada de BIND intenta realizar varias transferencias hacia una zona esclava en rápida sucesión. Este defecto podría ser aprovechado deliberadamente por un atacante al que se le permite hacer que un servidor vulnerable inicie transferencias de zona (por ejemplo, mediante el envío de mensajes NOTIFY válidos), lo que provoca que el proceso named se cierre tras fallar la prueba de aserción. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104386 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040941 https://kb.isc.org/docs/aa-01602 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180926-0004 • CWE-617: Reachable Assertion •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 94%CPEs: 26EXPL: 0CVE-2018-5740 – A flaw in the "deny-answer-aliases" feature can cause an assertion failure in named
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-5740
"deny-answer-aliases" is a little-used feature intended to help recursive server operators protect end users against DNS rebinding attacks, a potential method of circumventing the security model used by client browsers. However, a defect in this feature makes it easy, when the feature is in use, to experience an assertion failure in name.c. Affects BIND 9.7.0->9.8.8, 9.9.0->9.9.13, 9.10.0->9.10.8, 9.11.0->9.11.4, 9.12.0->9.12.2, 9.13.0->9.13.2. "deny-answer-aliases" es una característica poco utilizada que pretende ayudar a los operadores recursivos del servidor a proteger a los usuarios finales contra ataques de reenlace DNS, un método para poder eludir el modelo de seguridad empleado por los navegadores del cliente. Sin embargo, un defecto en esta característica hace que sea sencillo experimentar un fallo de aserción en name.c. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00026.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00027.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105055 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041436 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2570 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2571 https://kb.isc.org/docs/aa-01639 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/08/msg00033.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/11&#x • CWE-617: Reachable Assertion •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 18EXPL: 0CVE-2018-5738 – Some versions of BIND can improperly permit recursive query service to unauthorized clients
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-5738
Change #4777 (introduced in October 2017) introduced an unforeseen issue in releases which were issued after that date, affecting which clients are permitted to make recursive queries to a BIND nameserver. The intended (and documented) behavior is that if an operator has not specified a value for the "allow-recursion" setting, it SHOULD default to one of the following: none, if "recursion no;" is set in named.conf; a value inherited from the "allow-query-cache" or "allow-query" settings IF "recursion yes;" (the default for that setting) AND match lists are explicitly set for "allow-query-cache" or "allow-query" (see the BIND9 Administrative Reference Manual section 6.2 for more details); or the intended default of "allow-recursion {localhost; localnets;};" if "recursion yes;" is in effect and no values are explicitly set for "allow-query-cache" or "allow-query". However, because of the regression introduced by change #4777, it is possible when "recursion yes;" is in effect and no match list values are provided for "allow-query-cache" or "allow-query" for the setting of "allow-recursion" to inherit a setting of all hosts from the "allow-query" setting default, improperly permitting recursion to all clients. Affects BIND 9.9.12, 9.10.7, 9.11.3, 9.12.0->9.12.1-P2, the development release 9.13.0, and also releases 9.9.12-S1, 9.10.7-S1, 9.11.3-S1, and 9.11.3-S2 from BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition. El cambio #4777 (presentado en octubre de 2017) introdujo un problema no imaginado en las versiones lanzadas tras esa fecha, que afecta a los clientes que pueden realizar consultas recursivas a un servidor de nombre de BIND. • http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041115 https://kb.isc.org/docs/aa-01616 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201903-13 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190830-0002 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3683-1 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •