Page 10 of 79 results (0.005 seconds)

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 88%CPEs: 55EXPL: 3

The Windows Animated Cursor (ANI) capability in Windows NT, Windows 2000 through SP4, Windows XP through SP1, and Windows 2003 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the AnimationHeaderBlock length field, which leads to a stack-based buffer overflow. La capacidad de Cursor Animado de Windows (archivos .ANI) de Windows NT, Windows 2000 hasta SP4, Windows XP hasta SP1, y Windows 2003 permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código de su elección mediante el campo de longitud AnimationHeaderBlock, lo que conduce a un desbordamiento de búfer basado en la pila. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/771 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/765 http://eeye.com/html/research/advisories/AD20050111.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=110547079218397&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=110556975827760&w=2 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/12233 https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2005/ms05-002 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/18879 •

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 94%CPEs: 37EXPL: 0

The License Logging service for Windows NT Server, Windows 2000 Server, and Windows Server 2003 does not properly validate the length of messages, which leads to an "unchecked buffer" and allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code, aka the "License Logging Service Vulnerability." • http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/130433 http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA05-039A.html https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2005/ms05-010 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/19101 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A2568 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A3582 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A47 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 79%CPEs: 24EXPL: 0

The Hyperlink Object Library for Windows 98, 2000, XP, and Server 2003 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted link that triggers an "unchecked buffer" in the library, possibly due to a buffer overflow. La biblioteca de objetos Hyperlink para Windows 98, 2000, XP y Server 2003 permite a los atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario a través de un enlace diseñado que activa un "buffer no controlado" en la biblioteca, posiblemente debido a un desbordamiento del buffer. • http://secunia.com/advisories/14195 http://securitytracker.com/id?1013119 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/820427 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/12479 http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA05-039A.html https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2005/ms05-015 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/19110 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A2570 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 49%CPEs: 25EXPL: 0

The OLE component in Windows 98, 2000, XP, and Server 2003, and Exchange Server 5.0 through 2003, does not properly validate the lengths of messages for certain OLE data, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code, aka the "Input Validation Vulnerability." • http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/927889 http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA05-039A.html https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2005/ms05-012 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/19109 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A1180 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A2917 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A35 •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 96%CPEs: 49EXPL: 1

The Server Message Block (SMB) implementation for Windows NT 4.0, 2000, XP, and Server 2003 does not properly validate certain SMB packets, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via Transaction responses containing (1) Trans or (2) Trans2 commands, aka the "Server Message Block Vulnerability," and as demonstrated using Trans2 FIND_FIRST2 responses with large file name length fields. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/1065 http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=110792638401852&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=111040962600205&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=ntbugtraq&m=110795643831169&w=2 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/652537 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/12484 http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA05-039A.html https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2005/ms05-011 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/19089 https& •