CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 10%CPEs: 59EXPL: 5CVE-2022-1292 – The c_rehash script allows command injection
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-1292
The c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). • https://github.com/alcaparra/CVE-2022-1292 https://github.com/li8u99/CVE-2022-1292 https://github.com/greek0x0/CVE-2022-1292 https://github.com/rama291041610/CVE-2022-1292 https://github.com/und3sc0n0c1d0/CVE-2022-1292 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-953464.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=1ad73b4d27bd8c1b369a3cd453681d3a4f1bb9b2 https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=548d3f280a6e737673f5b61fce24bb100108dfeb https://git • CWE-77: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') •
CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 43EXPL: 0CVE-2022-1343 – OCSP_basic_verify may incorrectly verify the response signing certificate
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-1343
The function `OCSP_basic_verify` verifies the signer certificate on an OCSP response. In the case where the (non-default) flag OCSP_NOCHECKS is used then the response will be positive (meaning a successful verification) even in the case where the response signing certificate fails to verify. It is anticipated that most users of `OCSP_basic_verify` will not use the OCSP_NOCHECKS flag. In this case the `OCSP_basic_verify` function will return a negative value (indicating a fatal error) in the case of a certificate verification failure. The normal expected return value in this case would be 0. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-953464.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=2eda98790c5c2741d76d23cc1e74b0dc4f4b391a https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220602-0009 https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220503.txt https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-1343 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2087911 • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 43EXPL: 0CVE-2022-1473 – Resource leakage when decoding certificates and keys
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-1473
The OPENSSL_LH_flush() function, which empties a hash table, contains a bug that breaks reuse of the memory occuppied by the removed hash table entries. This function is used when decoding certificates or keys. If a long lived process periodically decodes certificates or keys its memory usage will expand without bounds and the process might be terminated by the operating system causing a denial of service. Also traversing the empty hash table entries will take increasingly more time. Typically such long lived processes might be TLS clients or TLS servers configured to accept client certificate authentication. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-953464.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=64c85430f95200b6b51fe9475bd5203f7c19daf1 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-02 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220602-0009 https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220503.txt https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-1473 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2087913 • CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime CWE-459: Incomplete Cleanup •
CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 28EXPL: 2CVE-2022-29824 – libxml2: integer overflows in xmlBuf and xmlBuffer lead to out-of-bounds write
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-29824
In libxml2 before 2.9.14, several buffer handling functions in buf.c (xmlBuf*) and tree.c (xmlBuffer*) don't check for integer overflows. This can result in out-of-bounds memory writes. Exploitation requires a victim to open a crafted, multi-gigabyte XML file. Other software using libxml2's buffer functions, for example libxslt through 1.1.35, is affected as well. En libxml2 versiones anteriores a 2.9.14, varias funciones de manejo de búferes en buf.c (xmlBuf*) y tree.c (xmlBuffer*) no comprueban los desbordamientos de enteros. • http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/167345/libxml2-xmlBufAdd-Heap-Buffer-Overflow.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/169825/libxml2-xmlParseNameComplex-Integer-Overflow.html https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/-/commit/2554a2408e09f13652049e5ffb0d26196b02ebab https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/-/commit/6c283d83eccd940bcde15634ac8c7f100e3caefd https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/-/tags/v2.9.14 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxslt/-/tags https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/05/msg0 • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •
CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 20EXPL: 1CVE-2022-22576 – curl: OAUTH2 bearer bypass in connection re-use
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-22576
An improper authentication vulnerability exists in curl 7.33.0 to and including 7.82.0 which might allow reuse OAUTH2-authenticated connections without properly making sure that the connection was authenticated with the same credentials as set for this transfer. This affects SASL-enabled protocols: SMPTP(S), IMAP(S), POP3(S) and LDAP(S) (openldap only). Se presenta una vulnerabilidad de autenticación inapropiada en curl versiones 7.33.0 hasta 7.82.0 incluyéndola, que podría permitir reúso de conexiones autenticadas por OAUTH2 sin asegurarse apropiadamente de que la conexión fue autenticada con las mismas credenciales establecidas para esta transferencia. Esto afecta a los protocolos con SASL: SMPTP(S), IMAP(S), POP3(S) y LDAP(S) (sólo openldap) A vulnerability was found in curl. This security flaw allows reusing OAUTH2-authenticated connections without properly ensuring that the connection was authenticated with the same credentials set for this transfer. • https://hackerone.com/reports/1526328 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/08/msg00017.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202212-01 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220609-0008 https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5197 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-22576 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077541 • CWE-287: Improper Authentication CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function •