CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 335EXPL: 0CVE-2019-10247 – jetty: error path information disclosure
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-10247
In Eclipse Jetty version 7.x, 8.x, 9.2.27 and older, 9.3.26 and older, and 9.4.16 and older, the server running on any OS and Jetty version combination will reveal the configured fully qualified directory base resource location on the output of the 404 error for not finding a Context that matches the requested path. The default server behavior on jetty-distribution and jetty-home will include at the end of the Handler tree a DefaultHandler, which is responsible for reporting this 404 error, it presents the various configured contexts as HTML for users to click through to. This produced HTML includes output that contains the configured fully qualified directory base resource location for each context. En Eclipse Jetty versión 7.x, versión 8.x,versión 9.2.27 y anteriores , versión 9.3.26 y anteriores , y versión 9.4.16 y anteriores, el servidor que se ejecuta en cualquier combinación de versión de sistema operativo y Jetty, revelará la ubicación del recurso base de directorio calificado y completamente configurado en la salida del error 404 para no encontrar un contexto que coincida con la path requerida. El comportamiento del servidor por defecto en jetty-distribution y jetty-home incluirá al final del árbol de Handlers un DefaultHandler, que es responsable de informar este error 404, presenta los diversos contextos configurados como HTML para que los usuarios hagan clic. • https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=546577 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/053d9ce4d579b02203db18545fee5e33f35f2932885459b74d1e4272%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/519eb0fd45642dcecd9ff74cb3e71c20a4753f7d82e2f07864b5108f%40%3Cdev.drill.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ac51944aef91dd5006b8510b0bef337adaccfe962fb90e7af9c22db4%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bcce5a9c532b386c68dab2f6b3ce8b0cc9b950ec551766e76391caa3%40%3Ccommits.nifi.apache.org%3E https://lists. • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-213: Exposure of Sensitive Information Due to Incompatible Policies •
CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 2%CPEs: 218EXPL: 4CVE-2019-11358 – jquery: Prototype pollution in object's prototype leading to denial of service, remote code execution, or property injection
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-11358
jQuery before 3.4.0, as used in Drupal, Backdrop CMS, and other products, mishandles jQuery.extend(true, {}, ...) because of Object.prototype pollution. If an unsanitized source object contained an enumerable __proto__ property, it could extend the native Object.prototype. jQuery, en versiones anteriores a 3.4.0, como es usado en Drupal, Backdrop CMS, y otros productos, maneja mal jQuery.extend(true, {}, ...) debido a la contaminación de Object.prototype. Si un objeto fuente no sanitizado contenía una propiedad enumerable __proto__, podría extender el Object.prototype nativo. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability was found in jquery. Untrusted JSON passed to the `extend` function could lead to modifying objects up the prototype chain, including the global Object. • https://github.com/isacaya/CVE-2019-11358 https://github.com/ossf-cve-benchmark/CVE-2019-11358 https://github.com/Snorlyd/https-nj.gov---CVE-2019-11358 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00006.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00025.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152787/dotCMS-5.1.1-Vulnerable-Dependencies.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153237/RetireJS-CORS-Issue-Script-Execution.html http://packetstormsecurity.c • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') •
CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 96%CPEs: 68EXPL: 3CVE-2019-0211 – Apache HTTP Server Privilege Escalation Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-0211
In Apache HTTP Server 2.4 releases 2.4.17 to 2.4.38, with MPM event, worker or prefork, code executing in less-privileged child processes or threads (including scripts executed by an in-process scripting interpreter) could execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the parent process (usually root) by manipulating the scoreboard. Non-Unix systems are not affected. En Apache HTTP Server 2.4, versiones 2.4.17 a 2.4.38, con el evento MPM, worker o prefork, el código ejecutándose en procesos hijo (o hilos) menos privilegiados (incluyendo scripts ejecutados por un intérprete de scripts en proceso) podría ejecutar código arbitrario con los privilegios del proceso padre (normalmente root) manipulando el marcador. Los sistemas que no son Unix no se ven afectados. A flaw was found in Apache where code executing in a less-privileged child process or thread could execute arbitrary code with the privilege of the parent process (usually root). • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/46676 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00051.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00061.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00084.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152386/Apache-2.4.38-Root-Privilege-Escalation.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152415/Slackware-Security-Advisory-httpd-Updates.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152441/CARPE-DIEM-Apache-2.4.x • CWE-250: Execution with Unnecessary Privileges CWE-416: Use After Free •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 1%CPEs: 180EXPL: 0CVE-2019-1559 – 0-byte record padding oracle
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-1559
If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable "non-stitched" ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-03/msg00041.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00019.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00046.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00047.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00049.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00080.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107174 https://access. • CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy CWE-325: Missing Cryptographic Step •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 114EXPL: 0CVE-2018-15756 – DoS Attack via Range Requests
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-15756
Spring Framework, version 5.1, versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.10, versions 4.3.x prior to 4.3.20, and older unsupported versions on the 4.2.x branch provide support for range requests when serving static resources through the ResourceHttpRequestHandler, or starting in 5.0 when an annotated controller returns an org.springframework.core.io.Resource. A malicious user (or attacker) can add a range header with a high number of ranges, or with wide ranges that overlap, or both, for a denial of service attack. This vulnerability affects applications that depend on either spring-webmvc or spring-webflux. Such applications must also have a registration for serving static resources (e.g. JS, CSS, images, and others), or have an annotated controller that returns an org.springframework.core.io.Resource. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105703 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/339fd112517e4873695b5115b96acdddbfc8f83b10598528d37c7d12%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/77886fec378ee6064debb1efb6b464a4a0173b2ff0d151ed86d3a228%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7b156ee50ba3ecce87b33c06bf7a749d84ffee55e69bfb5eca88fcc3%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8a1fe70534fc52ff5c9db5ac29c55657f802cbefd7e9d9850c7052bd%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/ • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •