Page 10 of 116 results (0.008 seconds)

CVSS: 3.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

Vulnerability in the Hyperion Financial Reporting product of Oracle Hyperion (component: Web Based Report Designer). The supported version that is affected is 11.1.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Hyperion Financial Reporting. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized read access to a subset of Hyperion Financial Reporting accessible data. • https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2020.html •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 27EXPL: 1

SQLite through 3.31.1 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) via a malformed window-function query because the AggInfo object's initialization is mishandled. SQLite versiones hasta 3.31.1, permite a atacantes causar una denegación de servicio (fallo de segmentación) por medio de una consulta de una función de window malformada porque la inicialización el objeto AggInfo es manejada inapropiadamente. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/05/msg00006.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/08/msg00037.html https://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-20:22.sqlite.asc https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202007-26 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200416-0001 https://usn.ubuntu.com/4394-1 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html https://www.oracle.com/security- • CWE-665: Improper Initialization •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 15EXPL: 0

In SQLite through 3.31.1, the ALTER TABLE implementation has a use-after-free, as demonstrated by an ORDER BY clause that belongs to a compound SELECT statement. En SQLite versiones hasta 3.31.1, la implementación de ALTER TABLE presenta un uso de la memoria previamente liberada, como es demostrado por una cláusula ORDER BY que pertenece a una sentencia SELECT compuesta. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-20:22.sqlite.asc https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202007-26 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200416-0001 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2021.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2020.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html https://www.sqlite.org/src/info/d09f8c3621d5 • CWE-416: Use After Free •

CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 60EXPL: 0

In Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.30, 8.5.0 to 8.5.50 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.99 the HTTP header parsing code used an approach to end-of-line parsing that allowed some invalid HTTP headers to be parsed as valid. This led to a possibility of HTTP Request Smuggling if Tomcat was located behind a reverse proxy that incorrectly handled the invalid Transfer-Encoding header in a particular manner. Such a reverse proxy is considered unlikely. En Apache Tomcat versiones 9.0.0.M1 hasta 9.0.30, versiones 8.5.0 hasta 8.5.50 y versiones 7.0.0 hasta 7.0.99, el código de análisis del encabezado HTTP utilizó un enfoque para el análisis de fin de línea que permitió a algunos encabezados HTTP no válidos ser analizados como válidos. Esto conllevó a una posibilidad de Tráfico No Autorizado de Peticiones HTTP si Tomcat se encontraba detrás de un proxy inverso que manejaba incorrectamente el encabezado Transfer-Encoding no válido en una manera particular. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-03/msg00025.html https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r127f76181aceffea2bd4711b03c595d0f115f63e020348fe925a916c%40%3Cannounce.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r441c1f30a252bf14b07396286f6abd8089ce4240e91323211f1a2d75%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r660cd379afe346f10d72c0eaa8459ccc95d83aff181671b7e9076919%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7bc994c965a34876bd94d5ff15b4e1e30b6220a15eb9b47c81915b78%40%3Ccommits.tomee.apache.org%3E • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 16EXPL: 0

In SQLite 3.31.1, isAuxiliaryVtabOperator allows attackers to trigger a NULL pointer dereference and segmentation fault because of generated column optimizations. En SQLite versión 3.31.1, la función isAuxiliaryVtabOperator permite a atacantes desencadenar una desreferencia del puntero NULL y un fallo de segmentación debido a las optimizaciones de columna generadas. A NULL pointer dereference was found in SQLite in the way it executes select statements with column optimizations. An attacker who is able to execute SQL statements can use this flaw to crash the application. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202003-16 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200313-0002 https://usn.ubuntu.com/4298-1 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2021.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2020.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html https://www.sqlite.org/cgi/src/info/4374860b29383380 https://www.sqlite. • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •