CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 3%CPEs: 43EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9517 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to unconstrained interal data buffering, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9517
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to unconstrained interal data buffering, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens the HTTP/2 window so the peer can send without constraint; however, they leave the TCP window closed so the peer cannot actually write (many of) the bytes on the wire. The attacker then sends a stream of requests for a large response object. Depending on how the servers queue the responses, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. Algunas implementaciones HTTP / 2 son vulnerables al almacenamiento en búfer de datos interal sin restricciones, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00004.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00032.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/08/15/7 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2893 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2925 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2939 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2946 https:/ • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 9%CPEs: 39EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9511 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9511
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a la manipulación del tamaño de la ventana y la manipulación de priorización de flujo, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00035.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00003.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00005.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00014.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2692 https:/ • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 82%CPEs: 55EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9514 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9514
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a una inundación de reinicio, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. El atacante abre una serie de secuencias y envía una solicitud no válida sobre cada secuencia que debería solicitar una secuencia de tramas RST_STREAM del par. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00076.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00002.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00011.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00021.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 61EXPL: 0CVE-2019-14379 – jackson-databind: default typing mishandling leading to remote code execution
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-14379
SubTypeValidator.java in FasterXML jackson-databind before 2.9.9.2 mishandles default typing when ehcache is used (because of net.sf.ehcache.transaction.manager.DefaultTransactionManagerLookup), leading to remote code execution. El archivo SubTypeValidator.java en jackson-databind de FasterXML en versiones anteriores a la 2.9.9.2 maneja inapropiadamente la escritura predeterminada cuando se usa ehcache (debido a net.sf.ehcache.transaction.manager.DefaultTransactionManagerLookup), lo que conlleva a la ejecución de código remoto. A flaw was discovered in FasterXML jackson-databind, where it would permit polymorphic deserialization of malicious objects using the ehcache and logback JNDI gadgets when used in conjunction with polymorphic type handling methods such as `enableDefaultTyping()` or when @JsonTypeInfo is using `Id.CLASS` or `Id.MINIMAL_CLASS` or in any other way which ObjectMapper.readValue might instantiate objects from unsafe sources. An attacker could use this flaw to execute arbitrary code. • http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Mar/23 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:2824 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2743 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2858 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2935 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2936 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2937 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2938 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2998 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2 • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 28EXPL: 0CVE-2019-10184 – undertow: Information leak in requests for directories without trailing slashes
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-10184
undertow before version 2.0.23.Final is vulnerable to an information leak issue. Web apps may have their directory structures predicted through requests without trailing slashes via the api. Undertow en versiones anteriores a la 2.0.23.Final es vulnerable a un problema de fuga de información. Las aplicaciones web pueden tener sus estructuras de directorio predecibles a través de solicitudes sin barras finales mediante la API. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2935 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2936 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2937 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2938 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2998 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3044 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3045 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3046 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3050 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA • CWE-862: Missing Authorization •