CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 76%CPEs: 70EXPL: 4CVE-2018-1270 – spring-framework: Possible RCE via spring messaging
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1270
Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the spring-messaging module. A malicious user (or attacker) can craft a message to the broker that can lead to a remote code execution attack. Spring Framework, en versiones 5.0 anteriores a la 5.0.5 y versiones 4.3 anteriores a la 4.3.15, así como versiones más antiguas no soportadas, permite que las aplicaciones expongan STOMP en endpoints WebSocket con un simple agente STOMP en memoria a través del módulo spring-messaging. Un usuario (o atacante) malicioso puede manipular un mensaje al agente que desemboca en un ataque de ejecución remota de código. Pivotal Spring Java Framework versions 5.0.x and below suffer from a remote code execution vulnerability. • https://github.com/CaledoniaProject/CVE-2018-1270 https://github.com/Venscor/CVE-2018-1270 https://github.com/tafamace/CVE-2018-1270 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103696 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2939 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/4ed49b103f64a0cecb38064f26cbf1389afc12124653da2d35166dbe%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists& • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') CWE-358: Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard •
CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 14EXPL: 0CVE-2017-12150 – samba: Some code path don't enforce smb signing, when they should
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-12150
It was found that samba before 4.4.16, 4.5.x before 4.5.14, and 4.6.x before 4.6.8 did not enforce "SMB signing" when certain configuration options were enabled. A remote attacker could launch a man-in-the-middle attack and retrieve information in plain-text. Se ha descubierto que Samba en versiones anteriores a la 4.4.16, versiones 4.5.x anteriores a la 4.5.14 y versiones 4.6.x anteriores a la 4.6.8 no cumple "SMB signing" cuando están habilitadas determinadas opciones de configuración. Un atacante remoto podría lanzar un ataque Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) y recuperar información en texto plano. It was found that samba did not enforce "SMB signing" when certain configuration options were enabled. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100918 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039401 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2789 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2790 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2791 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2858 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2017-12150 https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-hpesbns03775en_us https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20170 • CWE-300: Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint •
CVSS: 7.1EPSS: 53%CPEs: 14EXPL: 0CVE-2017-12163 – Samba: Server memory information leak over SMB1
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-12163
An information leak flaw was found in the way SMB1 protocol was implemented by Samba before 4.4.16, 4.5.x before 4.5.14, and 4.6.x before 4.6.8. A malicious client could use this flaw to dump server memory contents to a file on the samba share or to a shared printer, though the exact area of server memory cannot be controlled by the attacker. Se ha descubierto una vulnerabilidad de fuga de información en la manera en la que Samba, en versiones anteriores a la 4.4.16, versiones 4.5.x anteriores a la 4.5.14 y versiones 4.6.x anteriores a la 4.6.8, implementó el protocolo SMB1. Un cliente malicioso podría utilizar esta vulnerabilidad para volcar los contenidos de la memoria del servidor en un archivo en el almacenamiento de samba o en una impresora compartida, aunque el atacante no pueda controlar el área exacta de memoria del servidor. An information leak flaw was found in the way SMB1 protocol was implemented by Samba. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100925 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039401 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2789 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2790 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2791 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2858 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2017-12163 https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-hpesbns03775en_us https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20170 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 11%CPEs: 10EXPL: 0CVE-2017-7539 – Qemu: qemu-nbd crashes due to undefined I/O coroutine
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-7539
An assertion-failure flaw was found in Qemu before 2.10.1, in the Network Block Device (NBD) server's initial connection negotiation, where the I/O coroutine was undefined. This could crash the qemu-nbd server if a client sent unexpected data during connection negotiation. A remote user or process could use this flaw to crash the qemu-nbd server resulting in denial of service. Se ha detectado un fallo de aserción en Qemu en versiones anteriores a la 2.10.1 en la negociación de conexión inicial de los servidores de NBD (Network Block Device) en el que la corrutina I/O no estaba definida. Esto podría provocar el cierre inesperado del servidor qemu-nbd si un cliente envía datos no esperados durante la negociación de la conexión. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/07/21/4 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/99944 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2628 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3466 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3470 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3471 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3472 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3473 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3474 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_b • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-617: Reachable Assertion •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 4%CPEs: 25EXPL: 0CVE-2017-10664 – Qemu: qemu-nbd: server breaks with SIGPIPE upon client abort
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-10664
qemu-nbd in QEMU (aka Quick Emulator) does not ignore SIGPIPE, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) by disconnecting during a server-to-client reply attempt. qemu-nbd en QEMU (Quick Emulator) no ignora la señal SIGPIPE, lo que permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio desconectando el proceso durante un intento de respuesta de servidor a cliente. Quick Emulator (QEMU) built with the Network Block Device (NBD) Server support is vulnerable to a crash via a SIGPIPE signal. The crash can occur if a client aborts a connection due to any failure during negotiation or read operation. A remote user/process could use this flaw to crash the qemu-nbd server resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS). • http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3920 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/06/29/1 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/99513 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2390 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2445 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3466 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3470 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3471 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3472 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RH • CWE-248: Uncaught Exception •