CVSS: 5.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 146EXPL: 0CVE-2016-4053 – squid: multiple issues in ESI processing
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-4053
Squid 3.x before 3.5.17 and 4.x before 4.0.9 allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive stack layout information via crafted Edge Side Includes (ESI) responses, related to incorrect use of assert and compiler optimization. Squid 3.x en versiones anteriores a 3.5.17 y 4.x en versiones anteriores a 4.0.9 permite a atacantes remotos obtener información sensible sobre la estructura de pila a través de respuestas Edge Side Includes (ESI) manipuladas, relacionado con el uso incorrecto de assert y optimización del compilador. Buffer overflow and input validation flaws were found in the way Squid processed ESI responses. If Squid was used as a reverse proxy, or for TLS/HTTPS interception, a remote attacker able to control ESI components on an HTTP server could use these flaws to crash Squid, disclose parts of the stack memory, or possibly execute arbitrary code as the user running Squid. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00069.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3625 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/20/6 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/20/9 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2016-2881720.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/t • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •
CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 4%CPEs: 144EXPL: 0CVE-2016-4052 – squid: multiple issues in ESI processing
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-4052
Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in Squid 3.x before 3.5.17 and 4.x before 4.0.9 allow remote HTTP servers to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code via crafted Edge Side Includes (ESI) responses. Múltiples desbordamientos de buffer basado en pila en Squid 3.x en versiones anteriores a 3.5.17 y 4.x en versiones anteriores a 4.0.9 permiten a servidores HTTP remotos provocar una denegación de servicio o ejecutar código arbitrario a través de respuestas Edge Side Includes (ESI) manipuladas. Buffer overflow and input validation flaws were found in the way Squid processed ESI responses. If Squid was used as a reverse proxy, or for TLS/HTTPS interception, a remote attacker able to control ESI components on an HTTP server could use these flaws to crash Squid, disclose parts of the stack memory, or possibly execute arbitrary code as the user running Squid. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00069.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3625 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/20/6 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/20/9 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2016-2881720.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/t • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •
CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 21%CPEs: 146EXPL: 0CVE-2016-4054 – squid: multiple issues in ESI processing
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-4054
Buffer overflow in Squid 3.x before 3.5.17 and 4.x before 4.0.9 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted Edge Side Includes (ESI) responses. Desbordamiento de buffer en Squid 3.x en versiones anteriores a 3.5.17 y 4.x en versiones anteriores a 4.0.9 permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario a través de respuestas Edge Side Includes (ESI) manipuladas. Buffer overflow and input validation flaws were found in the way Squid processed ESI responses. If Squid was used as a reverse proxy, or for TLS/HTTPS interception, a remote attacker able to control ESI components on an HTTP server could use these flaws to crash Squid, disclose parts of the stack memory, or possibly execute arbitrary code as the user running Squid. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00069.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3625 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/20/6 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/20/9 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinapr2016-2952096.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bi • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •
CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 154EXPL: 0CVE-2016-4051 – squid: buffer overflow in cachemgr.cgi
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-4051
Buffer overflow in cachemgr.cgi in Squid 2.x, 3.x before 3.5.17, and 4.x before 4.0.9 might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code by seeding manager reports with crafted data. Desbordamiento de buffer en cachemgr.cgi en Squid 2.x, 3.x en versiones anteriores a 3.5.17 y 4.x en versiones anteriores a 4.0.9 podría permitir a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio o ejecutar código arbitrario sembrando informes manager con datos manipulados. A buffer overflow flaw was found in the way the Squid cachemgr.cgi utility processed remotely relayed Squid input. When the CGI interface utility is used, a remote attacker could possibly use this flaw to execute arbitrary code. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00069.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3625 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/20/6 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/20/9 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2016-2881720.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/t • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 46%CPEs: 13EXPL: 3CVE-2016-3074 – libgd 2.1.1 - Signedness Heap Overflow
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-3074
Integer signedness error in GD Graphics Library 2.1.1 (aka libgd or libgd2) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or potentially execute arbitrary code via crafted compressed gd2 data, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow. Error de entero sin signo en GD Graphics Library 2.1.1 (también conocida como libgd o libgd2) permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (caída) o potencialmente ejecutar código arbitrario a través de datos gd2 comprimidos manipulados, lo que desencadena un desbordamiento de buffer basado en memoria dinámica. A signedness vulnerability exists in libgd version 2.1.1 which may result in a heap overflow when processing compressed gd2 data. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39736 http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-April/183263.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/183724.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00031.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/136757/libgd-2.1.1-Signedness.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2750.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Apr/72 http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3556 http& • CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow CWE-681: Incorrect Conversion between Numeric Types •