CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 109EXPL: 0CVE-2019-6471 – A race condition when discarding malformed packets can cause BIND to exit with an assertion failure
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-6471
A race condition which may occur when discarding malformed packets can result in BIND exiting due to a REQUIRE assertion failure in dispatch.c. Versions affected: BIND 9.11.0 -> 9.11.7, 9.12.0 -> 9.12.4-P1, 9.14.0 -> 9.14.2. Also all releases of the BIND 9.13 development branch and version 9.15.0 of the BIND 9.15 development branch and BIND Supported Preview Edition versions 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.7-S1. Una condición de carrera que puede presentarse al descartar paquetes malformados puede provocar la salida de BIND debido a un fallo de aserción de REQUIRE en el archivo dispatch.c. Versiones afectadas: BIND 9.11.0 hasta 9.11.7, 9.12.0 hasta 9.12.4-P1, 9.14.0 hasta 9.14.2. • https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2019-6471 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K10092301?utm_source=f5support&%3Butm_medium=RSS https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-6471 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1721780 • CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') CWE-617: Reachable Assertion •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 97%CPEs: 96EXPL: 0CVE-2019-11479 – kernel: tcp: excessive resource consumption for TCP connections with low MSS allows remote denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-11479
Jonathan Looney discovered that the Linux kernel default MSS is hard-coded to 48 bytes. This allows a remote peer to fragment TCP resend queues significantly more than if a larger MSS were enforced. A remote attacker could use this to cause a denial of service. This has been fixed in stable kernel releases 4.4.182, 4.9.182, 4.14.127, 4.19.52, 5.1.11, and is fixed in commits 967c05aee439e6e5d7d805e195b3a20ef5c433d6 and 5f3e2bf008c2221478101ee72f5cb4654b9fc363. Jonathan Looney descubrió que el tamaño máximo de segmento (MSS) por defecto del kernel de Linux está codificado a 48 bytes. • http://www.arubanetworks.com/assets/alert/ARUBA-PSA-2020-010.txt http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/06/28/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/06/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/06/4 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/108818 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1594 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1602 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1699 https://access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabili • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-405: Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification) CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 8.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 78EXPL: 0CVE-2018-5743 – Limiting simultaneous TCP clients was ineffective
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-5743
By design, BIND is intended to limit the number of TCP clients that can be connected at any given time. The number of allowed connections is a tunable parameter which, if unset, defaults to a conservative value for most servers. Unfortunately, the code which was intended to limit the number of simultaneous connections contained an error which could be exploited to grow the number of simultaneous connections beyond this limit. Versions affected: BIND 9.9.0 -> 9.10.8-P1, 9.11.0 -> 9.11.6, 9.12.0 -> 9.12.4, 9.14.0. BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition versions 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.11.5-S3, and 9.11.5-S5. • https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2018-5743 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K74009656?utm_source=f5support&%3Butm_medium=RSS https://www.synology.com/security/advisory/Synology_SA_19_20 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-5743 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1702541 • CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 1%CPEs: 180EXPL: 0CVE-2019-1559 – 0-byte record padding oracle
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-1559
If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable "non-stitched" ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-03/msg00041.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00019.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00046.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00047.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00049.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00080.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107174 https://access. • CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy CWE-325: Missing Cryptographic Step •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 57EXPL: 0CVE-2018-15328
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-15328
On BIG-IP 14.0.x, 13.x, 12.x, and 11.x, Enterprise Manager 3.1.1, BIG-IQ 6.x, 5.x, and 4.x, and iWorkflow 2.x, the passphrases for SNMPv3 users and trap destinations that are used for authentication and privacy are not handled by the BIG-IP system Secure Vault feature; they are written in the clear to the various configuration files. En BIG-IP 14.0.x, 13.x, 12.x y 11.x, Enterprise Manager 3.1.1, BIG-IQ 6.x, 5.x y 4.x, e iWorkflow 2.x, las frases de contraseña para los usuarios SNMPv3 y destinos de captura que se emplean para la autenticación y la privacidad no son gestionados por la característica del sistema Secure Vault de BIG-IP; están escritos en claro en los diferentes archivos de configuración. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106258 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K42027747 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •