CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 7%CPEs: 20EXPL: 2CVE-2021-28164 – Jetty 9.4.37.v20210219 - Information Disclosure
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-28164
In Eclipse Jetty 9.4.37.v20210219 to 9.4.38.v20210224, the default compliance mode allows requests with URIs that contain %2e or %2e%2e segments to access protected resources within the WEB-INF directory. For example a request to /context/%2e/WEB-INF/web.xml can retrieve the web.xml file. This can reveal sensitive information regarding the implementation of a web application. En Eclipse Jetty versiones 9.4.37.v20210219 hasta 9.4.38.v20210224, el modo de cumplimiento predeterminado permite a unas peticiones con URI que contienen segmentos %2e o %2e%2e acceder a recursos protegidos dentro del directorio WEB-INF. Por ejemplo, una petición a /context/%2e/WEB-INF/web.xml puede recuperar el archivo web.xml. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/50438 http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/164590/Jetty-9.4.37.v20210219-Information-Disclosure.html https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-v7ff-8wcx-gmc5 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r0841b06b48324cfc81325de3c05a92e53f997185f9d71ff47734d961%40%3Cissues.solr.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r111f1ce28b133a8090ca4f809a1bdf18a777426fc058dc3a16c39c66%40%3Cissues.solr.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r2a3ea27cca2ac7352d392b023b72e824387bc9ff16ba245ec663bdc6% • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-551: Incorrect Behavior Order: Authorization Before Parsing and Canonicalization •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 80%CPEs: 24EXPL: 2CVE-2021-28165 – jetty: Resource exhaustion when receiving an invalid large TLS frame
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-28165
In Eclipse Jetty 7.2.2 to 9.4.38, 10.0.0.alpha0 to 10.0.1, and 11.0.0.alpha0 to 11.0.1, CPU usage can reach 100% upon receiving a large invalid TLS frame. En Eclipse Jetty versiones 7.2.2 hasta 9.4.38, versiones 10.0.0.alpha0 hasta 10.0.1 y versiones 11.0.0.alpha0 hasta 11.0.1, el uso de CPU puede alcanzar el 100% al recibir una gran trama TLS no válida. When using SSL/TLS with Jetty, either with HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, or WebSocket, the server may receive an invalid large (greater than 17408) TLS frame that is incorrectly handled, causing high CPU resources utilization. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to service availability. • https://github.com/uthrasri/CVE-2021-28165 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/04/20/3 https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-26vr-8j45-3r4w https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r002258611ed0c35b82b839d284b43db9dcdec120db8afc1c993137dc%40%3Cnotifications.zookeeper.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r03ca0b69db1e3e5f72fe484b71370d537cd711cbf334e2913332730a%40%3Cissues.spark.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r05db8e0ef01e1280cc7543575ae0fa1c2b4d06a8b928916ef65dd2ad%40%3Creviews.spark • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-551: Incorrect Behavior Order: Authorization Before Parsing and Canonicalization CWE-755: Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions •
CVSS: 4.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 33EXPL: 1CVE-2021-28163 – jetty: Symlink directory exposes webapp directory contents
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-28163
In Eclipse Jetty 9.4.32 to 9.4.38, 10.0.0.beta2 to 10.0.1, and 11.0.0.beta2 to 11.0.1, if a user uses a webapps directory that is a symlink, the contents of the webapps directory is deployed as a static webapp, inadvertently serving the webapps themselves and anything else that might be in that directory. En Eclipse Jetty versiones 9.4.32 hasta 9.4.38, versiones 10.0.0.beta2 hasta 10.0.1 y versiones 11.0.0.beta2 hasta 11.0.1, si un usuario usa un directorio de aplicaciones web que es un enlace simbólico, el contenido del directorio de aplicaciones web se implementa como una aplicación web estática, sin darse cuenta, sirviendo las aplicaciones web en sí y cualquier otra cosa que pueda estar en ese directorio. If the ${jetty.base} directory or the ${jetty.base}/webapps directory is a symlink the contents of the ${jetty.base}/webapps directory may be deployed as a static web application, exposing the content of the directory for download. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality. • https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-j6qj-j888-vvgq https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r0841b06b48324cfc81325de3c05a92e53f997185f9d71ff47734d961%40%3Cissues.solr.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r111f1ce28b133a8090ca4f809a1bdf18a777426fc058dc3a16c39c66%40%3Cissues.solr.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r2ea2f0541121f17e470a0184843720046c59d4bde6d42bf5ca6fad81%40%3Cissues.solr.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r4a66bfbf62281e31bc1345ebecbfd96f35199eecd77bfe4e903e906f%40%3Cissues.ignite.apache.org%3 • CWE-59: Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following') CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 205EXPL: 0CVE-2021-3449 – NULL pointer deref in signature_algorithms processing
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-3449
An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/1 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/4 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-772220.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=fb9fa6b51defd48157eeb207f52181f735d96148 https://kb.pulse • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 75EXPL: 1CVE-2020-1971 – EDIPARTYNAME NULL pointer dereference
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-1971
The X.509 GeneralName type is a generic type for representing different types of names. One of those name types is known as EDIPartyName. OpenSSL provides a function GENERAL_NAME_cmp which compares different instances of a GENERAL_NAME to see if they are equal or not. This function behaves incorrectly when both GENERAL_NAMEs contain an EDIPARTYNAME. A NULL pointer dereference and a crash may occur leading to a possible denial of service attack. • https://github.com/MBHudson/CVE-2020-1971 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/09/14/2 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=2154ab83e14ede338d2ede9bbe5cdfce5d5a6c9e https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=f960d81215ebf3f65e03d4d5d857fb9b666d6920 https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA44676 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r63c6f2dd363d9b514d0a4bcf624580616a679898cc14c109a49b7 • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •